Highest % of top 7 victims

[Mbrown]

Tapash Baisya 91.67
Manjural Islam 85.71
Mohammad Sharif 85.71
Mashrafe Mortaza 82.98
Talha Jubair 78.57
Naimur Rahman 75.00
Enamul Hoque 72.22
Mohammad Rafique 69.86
Khaled Mahmud 69.23

(Qualification: min 10 wkts in career)

[GuruTM]

Who are the victims here? Bowlers of batsmen? Anyway good post. Welcome to BanglaCricket Mbrown. Enjoy your stay.

[Hatebreed]

Originally posted by TeamManager
Who are the victims here? Bowlers of batsmen? Anyway good post. Welcome to BanglaCricket Mbrown. Enjoy your stay.

Batsmen of course... I'm surprised to see Mashree at 4th :cool2:

[Fazal]

With the assumption that I fully understood what he meant, Tapash 's 91.67% of top 7 victims is not necessarily mean any good than for example 82.98 (Mashrefee).

Assuming 5 TEST matches:

Bowler A can get 2 "top 7 batsman" for each test (2 innings) thefore getting 10 wickets with the rating 100% top 7 victims and a grand total wicket of 10

Bowler B can get 10 wickets for each test (2 Innings). Out of which, for both innings 7 of them (3 in 1st innings and 4 in 2nd Innings) are top 7 victims. He will end up with 50 wickets and a rating of 70% "of top 7 victims".

Therefore basically it means little.... unless I misunderstood what he wanted to say.



Edited on, January 7, 2006, 5:42 AM GMT, by Fazal.

[Orpheus]

Originally posted by Fazal
With the assumption that I fully understood what he meant, Tapash 's 91.67% of top 7 victims is not necessarily mean any good than for example 82.98 (Mashrefee).

Assuming 5 TEST matches:

Bowler A can get 2 "top 7 batsman" for each test (2 innings) thefore getting 10 wickets with the rating 100% top 7 victims and a grand total wicket of 10

Bowler B can get 10 wickets for each test (2 Innings). Out of which, for both innings 7 of them (3 in 1st innings and 4 in 2nd Innings) are top 7 victims. He will end up with 50 wickets and a rating of 70% "of top 7 victims".

Therefore basically it means little.... unless I misunderstood what he wanted to say.



Edited on, January 7, 2006, 5:42 AM GMT, by Fazal.

I think you understood him quiet well and it doesn't mean much ... I think case B would fit perfectly for rafiq...that's why he is placed so low... He gets 50 wickets and 35 of them are top... but let's say taposh gets 10 and all are top..... according to this calc... Taposh is a "better" bowler....

Edited on, January 7, 2006, 6:01 AM GMT, by Orpheus.

[Orpheus]

by the way fazal don't mind, I basically repeated you.. cuz I thought you explanation skills pretty much sucks..

Comparing players with similar wickets might be valuable...