facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

View Poll Results: fast bowler
put another seamer in the side 17 94.44%
keep it how it is 1 5.56%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 29, 2006, 01:23 PM
tiger1000's Avatar
tiger1000 tiger1000 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 23, 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4,611
Angry bdesh selectors

why did the selectors pick 4 spinners and only 2 seamers
i would say remove kapali or rassak and put a seamer in
u can probebely put farhad reza in he looks ok from his stats and is not a
spinner
or put rasel in he might trouble the zims when he swings it both ways
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old July 29, 2006, 01:28 PM
SS SS is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 24, 2004
Posts: 10,203

cuz selectors like laddoo
and they are happy when they get laddoo after loosing
sorry totally irrelevant answer as my head is not working. Ah well we don't even had heads i forgot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 29, 2006, 01:33 PM
BangladeshFan's Avatar
BangladeshFan BangladeshFan is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Posts: 2,184

bd should play 3 seamers. i think they are the only team who play with 2 left arm spinners. besides after seeing razzak action ( he was wearing full sleeve to hide it?) i guess he is lucky still to be in international cricket.
__________________
When The Going Gets Tough, The Tough Gets Going.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old July 29, 2006, 01:38 PM
Rubu's Avatar
Rubu Rubu is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: February 15, 2004
Location: Michigan
Favorite Player: Mashrafee Mortaza
Posts: 8,361

they should not have 3 of the players they played today.

no golla - get in rajin (his bowling might come handly today, might just might - but think how big of a difference that could make)

no rejjaq - what is he doing in the team at the first place? 'you know who' should have been there instead of him, but from the 15 rassel should have been there.

please have a limit on how much kopal some one can have - from the 15 member team, any of the new two batman would do better than him.
__________________
সন্মানজনক পরাজয়ের চিন্তাটাই অসন্মানজনক
- The days of playing for honorable defeat is over.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old July 29, 2006, 02:51 PM
al Furqaan's Avatar
al Furqaan al Furqaan is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,918

well razzak deserved to be in the 15 man squad...he has been a decent bowler so far in his career...has struggled mightly against zimbabwe tho.

he got his well deserved chance...and rana should have been in the 15...but i would rather go with rasel than rana
__________________
Bangladesh: Our Dream, Our Joy, Our Team

#OneTeam1Dream
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old July 29, 2006, 03:56 PM
Hatebreed's Avatar
Hatebreed Hatebreed is offline
BC T-Shirt Design Winner
 
Join Date: June 19, 2005
Location: Camden, London
Favorite Player: Mashrafe Mortaza
Posts: 7,199

I already wanted Rajin to play as opener, and we should include Farhad Reza and Saqib to replace Kapali and Razzak.
__________________
My photography
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old July 29, 2006, 08:41 PM
Sovik's Avatar
Sovik Sovik is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Favorite Player: Brian Charles Lara
Posts: 9,242

our team selectors never dreamt of winning when they were playing.
__________________
All I know about boxing is never bet on the white guy. - Frank Drebin
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old July 29, 2006, 10:18 PM
BD Tigers's Avatar
BD Tigers BD Tigers is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 20, 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,329

I dont know what's the big deal here. Zim batsmen played really well and took the game away from us. That's it.

As for Razzak, I thought he played pretty good w/ the A team and also he has been good all along. If Golla had taken that catch of his bowling, his stat wud have been differrent and we cud have won the game.

Anyway for today's game, I think Rajin must get in place of Golla. Forhad shud replace Kapali to make the 3rd seamer but if Rassel gets in place of Razzak then Kapali will still play because of the selectors. But lets see. Hopefully we will have good fielding performance today and win the match.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old July 30, 2006, 12:21 AM
akabir77's Avatar
akabir77 akabir77 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 23, 2004
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Favorite Player: Nantu Ghotok
Posts: 10,882

one thing for sure they r all two faces of the same coin so it won't matter wether golla is playing or razin main thing is we have to field better and bat better
__________________
1. Shahadat Hossain: Mufambisi c Mashud; Chigumbura lbw; Utseya c Mashud
2.
Abdur Razzak: P Utseya caught; RW Price lbw; CB Mpofu lbw
3. Rubel Hossain: Corey J A bowled; BB McCullum caught; JDS Neesham caught
4.
Taijul Islam: T Panyangara bowled; J Nyumbu lbw; TL Chatara bowled
5.
Taskin Ahmed: DAS Gunaratne c Soumya; Lakmal c fiz; Pradeep bowled
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old July 30, 2006, 12:48 AM
mac's Avatar
mac mac is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 30, 2006
Location: DC
Favorite Player: All the Tigers
Posts: 2,923

The selectors are all useless or they have lost their glasses.
The pitch was two coloured and the ball was moving all the time. But they prefered to play 3 spinners. Kapali, JO and Razzaq should be dropped today.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old July 30, 2006, 12:49 AM
mac's Avatar
mac mac is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 30, 2006
Location: DC
Favorite Player: All the Tigers
Posts: 2,923

Quote:
Originally Posted by sovik
our team selectors never dreamt of winning when they were playing.
Ha Ha Ha.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old July 30, 2006, 01:15 AM
cricketboy's Avatar
cricketboy cricketboy is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 4, 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,005

I think the playing XI is decided by Bashar and Whatmore since no selector is there on the tour. Drop Golla and take anybody else.
__________________
~~^~~^~~^~~^~~^~~^~~^~~^~~
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old July 30, 2006, 04:43 AM
Sovik's Avatar
Sovik Sovik is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Favorite Player: Brian Charles Lara
Posts: 9,242

our selectors are accused of taking bribe
__________________
All I know about boxing is never bet on the white guy. - Frank Drebin
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old July 30, 2006, 06:37 AM
thebest thebest is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 21, 2005
Location: in the blue planet
Posts: 3,822

Quote:
Originally Posted by sovik
our selectors are accused of taking bribe
For getting contract for Ash. After Ash's performance I believe they bribed Reebok and Rainhill to get him the contract
__________________
Twenty20 is not a gentleman's game. It's like a one-night stand and not a marriage. It is a street format and the goonda doesn't know what is a late cut or a cover drive
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old July 30, 2006, 06:59 AM
Sovik's Avatar
Sovik Sovik is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Favorite Player: Brian Charles Lara
Posts: 9,242

Quote:
Originally Posted by thebest
For getting contract for Ash. After Ash's performance I believe they bribed Reebok and Rainhill to get him the contract
whaever it is we have dishonest selectors & selecting javed is the prove of it
__________________
All I know about boxing is never bet on the white guy. - Frank Drebin
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old July 31, 2006, 06:50 AM
tiger1000's Avatar
tiger1000 tiger1000 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 23, 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4,611

they put in farhad reza in for 2nd odi and it made a diffrence
he made 50 of 57 and his bowling was good to
10 overs and 43 runs
econ= 4.3
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old July 31, 2006, 07:40 AM
Miraz's Avatar
Miraz Miraz is offline
BC Staff
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Mohammad Rafique
Posts: 15,768

Current selectors are doing much better than any other selectors in the past. You can debate with their selections, but again the have pretty good logic behind their selections. They have their own mindset and that may differ with many of us. Definitely they are trying to do good for Bangladesh team.

Accusing someone doesn't prove him guilty. Treat them as innocents until proven guilty.
__________________
You only play good cricket when you win/draw matches.
I am with Bangladesh, whether they win or lose . http://twitter.com/BanglaCricket
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old July 31, 2006, 07:54 AM
Rabz's Avatar
Rabz Rabz is offline
BanglaCricket Staff
BC - Bangladesh Representative
 
Join Date: February 28, 2005
Location: Here
Favorite Player: Father of BD Cricket
Posts: 20,540

i cant watch the games.. so just following thru paltak and cricinfo cricbuzz...
but some of u r watching...
is any of our selector's in zimbabwe?? if NO is the answer then my question is..
WHY?? did they think watching the game thru the tv set like rest of us is good enuf for them...??
what the hell are they paid for then??

i wanna know what the selectors r doing sitting back home when this is such a crucial tour for us regarding winning first overseas series, trying out players for the next world cup, gettin team ready for the champions trophy qualifiers...??
__________________
Verily, in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find rest [Al-Qur'an,13:28]
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old July 31, 2006, 08:15 AM
akabir77's Avatar
akabir77 akabir77 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 23, 2004
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Favorite Player: Nantu Ghotok
Posts: 10,882

Selectors r not in zimbo cause they were acused of getting bribe and they wanted to sort that out before doing what they r paid to do... what a job...If my company accused me of stealling pencil, the next day I will tell them OK do an investigation on me, in the mean time i will not come to office and still get paid... in my dream that will happen....
__________________
1. Shahadat Hossain: Mufambisi c Mashud; Chigumbura lbw; Utseya c Mashud
2.
Abdur Razzak: P Utseya caught; RW Price lbw; CB Mpofu lbw
3. Rubel Hossain: Corey J A bowled; BB McCullum caught; JDS Neesham caught
4.
Taijul Islam: T Panyangara bowled; J Nyumbu lbw; TL Chatara bowled
5.
Taskin Ahmed: DAS Gunaratne c Soumya; Lakmal c fiz; Pradeep bowled
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old July 31, 2006, 11:10 AM
tiger1000's Avatar
tiger1000 tiger1000 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 23, 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4,611

i think they should drop javed omar and put in rajin saleh
javed has not been proforming and they should give saleh a chance.


Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket