facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 27, 2004, 11:23 AM
cricketfan's Avatar
cricketfan cricketfan is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: June 12, 2004
Posts: 545
Default Australian batsmen more selfish than Indian batsmen

Hayden recently suggested that Subcontinental batsmen were selfish who slowed down between 70 to 100 runs in ODIs thus costing the team about 50 runs per innings. As per the statistics of Wisden ( link below), it is just the other way round if the statistics of Indian ODI centurions are compared with the Australian centurions in the past three years. As per the figures, the strike rate for various batsmen of India and Australia between 70 to 100 is as follows:

Player Centuries SR between 70 to 100
Sehwag 5 144.4
Ganguly 6 127.2
Laxman 4 121.6
Ponting 7 118.4
Tendulkar 7 116.3
Gilchrist 4 106.1
Hayden 3 105.1

As can be seen, Hayden does not practice what he preaches.

Playing spin, and selfish batsmen
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old August 27, 2004, 02:54 PM
chinaman chinaman is offline
Retired BC Admin
 
Join Date: August 14, 2003
Location: pc near u
Posts: 8,021

In RSC, they were talking about the stats, SRT to be 10 not 7 and Lax to be 6 not 4.

Anyway, interesting to note that Hayden didn't singled out India in particular but the 'subcontinental batsmen'.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 27, 2004, 07:31 PM
James90's Avatar
James90 James90 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: August 8, 2002
Location: London, UK
Favorite Player: Michael Slater
Posts: 3,958

I don't understand that table? They all score over a run a ball between 70 and 100? Tendulkar only has 7 hundreds? I thought he had 30+? Ploise exploin
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 27, 2004, 07:39 PM
chinaman chinaman is offline
Retired BC Admin
 
Join Date: August 14, 2003
Location: pc near u
Posts: 8,021

Read the article. Calculation since 2001. The article has both 0-70 and 70-100 stats.

What wonders me most is that the writer didn't count Pak and Lanka (even BD for that matter ) to be subcontinental!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 28, 2004, 12:30 AM
AsifTheManRahman's Avatar
AsifTheManRahman AsifTheManRahman is offline
Super Moderator
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678

sub continent ta re nijego baaper shompotti banaise...:P
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 31, 2004, 08:45 PM
wang wang is offline
Street Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 14, 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 32

Those are highly misleading stats as it doesnt take into account the times that batsmen get between 70-100. Quite often batsmen that slow down get tied down and go out doing so. You will see Hayden and others getting out between 70-100 lifting the scoring rate.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket