facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 4, 2010, 01:33 PM
Isam Isam is offline
BD Correspondent, ESPNCricinfo
 
Join Date: July 14, 2010
Posts: 153
Default Analyzing Abdur Razzak, but he doesn't agree!


http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesig...php?nid=153651
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old September 4, 2010, 01:54 PM
nycpro96's Avatar
nycpro96 nycpro96 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Favorite Player: Tamim Iqbal
Posts: 6,063

Razzak is definitely not the same but we need him to go good for the world cup.
__________________
Reporter: You could hit the first ball for 4 couldn't you?
Tamim: Ha, I could hit the first ball for 6, that's not a problem.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 4, 2010, 02:17 PM
simon's Avatar
simon simon is offline
Cricket Savant
 
Join Date: February 20, 2008
Favorite Player: Tam,Sak,Nasa,Mash
Posts: 25,325

he needs to stop giving away too many runs in his overs,apart from that he is a good 50 ovr bowler.
__________________
সবাই সুখে সুখী হলে বলো তবে হবে কে ভবঘুরে
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 4, 2010, 02:41 PM
Rabz's Avatar
Rabz Rabz is offline
BanglaCricket Staff
BC - Bangladesh Representative
 
Join Date: February 28, 2005
Location: Here
Favorite Player: Father of BD Cricket
Posts: 20,540

Slight change needed to be made on that chart.
The second bar should be from 2008-2010 i guess, right ?

Nice report by the way.
We'd expect more of these from DS in the coming days.
__________________
Verily, in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find rest [Al-Qur'an,13:28]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old September 4, 2010, 02:54 PM
_Rafi_'s Avatar
_Rafi_ _Rafi_ is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: June 17, 2007
Location: UK
Favorite Player: Sakib,KP,Steyn
Posts: 4,073

Rajjak was bending upto 27 degrees before his action called illegal. he is not same Rajjak after changing his action. his days are over imo
Plus his reasoning is also poor in the article. T20 is not any excuse, Shakib can still maintain good econ. so as R> Price, Vettori etc. Bowling legside in every 2 balls and bowling way too many short balls has nothing to do with t20 cricket. We are actually conceding more runs than his bowling figures suggest...atleast 6-8 runs conceded from bye and leg-bye from his wide ball and leg-side ball. These runs are not added to his bowling figure.
Nowadays he cant bowl, cant field, cant hit sixes, gives too much runs in tight situation.We need a good replacement in line 2nd spinner. Shuvo also proved in-effective.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old September 4, 2010, 03:11 PM
FagunerAgun FagunerAgun is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: February 18, 2006
Favorite Player: Rafiq and Tendulkar
Posts: 5,636

Another good article from Isam.
Well, Razzak needs to adjust his bowling, and, yes, indeed.
But what is about his batting, which has been going south as well.
I was under the impression that he was one of our flourishing sla allrounders.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old September 4, 2010, 03:15 PM
nizzle nizzle is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 26, 2009
Location: MANCHESTER
Favorite Player: ME
Posts: 579

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Rafi_
Rajjak was bending upto 27 degrees before his action called illegal. he is not same Rajjak after changing his action. his days are over imo
Plus his reasoning is also poor in the article. T20 is not any excuse, Shakib can still maintain good econ. so as R> Price, Vettori etc. Bowling legside in every 2 balls and bowling way too many short balls has nothing to do with t20 cricket. We are actually conceding more runs than his bowling figures suggest...atleast 6-8 runs conceded from bye and leg-bye from his wide ball and leg-side ball. These runs are not added to his bowling figure.
Nowadays he cant bowl, cant field, cant hit sixes, gives too much runs in tight situation.We need a good replacement in line 2nd spinner. Shuvo also proved in-effective.
I reckon razzak just needs some extra practise especially on accuracy, i remember even this year on that second odi against england in bangladesh, he was proving to get better, and i wouldnt call shuvo ineffective, i reckon hes more useful for longer version
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old September 4, 2010, 04:31 PM
Nadim's Avatar
Nadim Nadim is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: September 16, 2008
Location: Guantanamo
Favorite Player: Innocent Bird
Posts: 48,721

his career is over...only reason he is still in the team because of his exp. the max he will last is till the wc...there r few spinners are fighting for his place and those r Nur Hossain(ls)/Shaker Ahmed(sla)/Mahmudul Hasan(ob).

Posted via BC Mobile Edition
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old September 4, 2010, 05:21 PM
nizzle nizzle is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 26, 2009
Location: MANCHESTER
Favorite Player: ME
Posts: 579

Quote:
Originally Posted by nadim 98
his career is over...only reason he is still in the team because of his exp. the max he will last is till the wc...there r few spinners are fighting for his place and those r Nur Hossain(ls)/Shaker Ahmed(sla)/Mahmudul Hasan(ob).

Posted via BC Mobile Edition
i really like razzak, inshallah this aint the case
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old September 4, 2010, 05:30 PM
BASSMAN BASSMAN is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: January 4, 2010
Posts: 1,170

Razaak has definately lost his mojo after his bowling action was classfied illegal.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old September 4, 2010, 10:24 PM
Tiger444's Avatar
Tiger444 Tiger444 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 17, 2008
Location: Connecticut, USA
Favorite Player: All the BD players
Posts: 8,793

Seeing these comments made by Raj doesn't give me hope for him..how can he not know that he's performing worse then before? Players should know when their doing good or bad..on top of that he blames it on the intro to T20s? Ridiculous..
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old September 4, 2010, 11:19 PM
Ajfar's Avatar
Ajfar Ajfar is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 17,886

Admitting your mistakes and trying to improve on them is always the right thing to do. I can't see himself getting any better with this kind of attitude. I hope i'm wrong. Good luck to him.
__________________
"I was the happiest man in the world, happier than Bill Gates"- Tamim Iqbal
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old September 5, 2010, 05:20 AM
lamisa's Avatar
lamisa lamisa is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: December 18, 2007
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: tamim,shafiul,mushy
Posts: 6,743

he's an asset for bd cricket.he's only 28,has a lot of time left to improve his bowling.i hope to see the old razzak back before the WC,an inform razzak,mash,shafiul and shakib will give our bowling a very strong backbone
__________________
haruk ba jituk,i am always there with BDcricket!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old September 5, 2010, 05:41 AM
bangla-red's Avatar
bangla-red bangla-red is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: August 3, 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 4,042

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon
he needs to stop giving away too many runs in his overs,apart from that he is a good 50 ovr bowler.
Um... wouldn't all bowlers be good if they conceded less runs per over?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old September 5, 2010, 10:40 AM
Tiger444's Avatar
Tiger444 Tiger444 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 17, 2008
Location: Connecticut, USA
Favorite Player: All the BD players
Posts: 8,793

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Rafi_
Rajjak was bending upto 27 degrees before his action called illegal. he is not same Rajjak after changing his action. his days are over imo
Plus his reasoning is also poor in the article. T20 is not any excuse, Shakib can still maintain good econ. so as R> Price, Vettori etc. Bowling legside in every 2 balls and bowling way too many short balls has nothing to do with t20 cricket. We are actually conceding more runs than his bowling figures suggest...atleast 6-8 runs conceded from bye and leg-bye from his wide ball and leg-side ball. These runs are not added to his bowling figure.
Nowadays he cant bowl, cant field, cant hit sixes, gives too much runs in tight situation.We need a good replacement in line 2nd spinner. Shuvo also proved in-effective.
Top post..if T20s have been disrupting his bowling then why hasn't Shakib suffered? He's still been economical and picks up a lot of wickets..and like the article says Shakib doesn't use too many variations..he's just very accurate and that gets him wickets..also a lot of Raj's wickets came from his chucking action..harsh to say but all these years Raj has been a chucker and now when he changes his action he can't even buy a wicket..when he plays tests it really shows how poor of a wicket taker he is..and what's with the leg side bowling? Does he really think that will be the line to bowl to get wickets? No wonder he thinks he's doing fine because I'm hardly seeing any changes from him..I like Raj but I think time has come to give other players an extended run..I mean we have so many SLA's that are waiting to play..Shuvo needs 5 more matches before I can rate him..just playing 5 matches and 1 match he bowled only 3 overs just doesn't really prove whether he's good or not..Saqlain needs an extended run as well..he's been so consistent in domestics so he should get a few chances..Samad's another player we should also trial out..we need to experiment with our SLA's more because Shakib is the only SLA that puts pressure on the other..we don't have another player to put the pressure..its getting sad that Mahmudullah/Naeem is putting more pressure on the batsmen then Raj and he's our specialist bowler!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket