facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 23, 2005, 12:58 PM
mahmoodh mahmoodh is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: July 20, 2004
Location: US
Posts: 115
Default Was it Topshe or Bash...let England reach 391

71 runs in 6 overs was what Tapash Baisha did for hungry England batsmen and he was aided again by our captain Basher to go for the 7th over that made English total richer in a moment. Why Bash had to call this run donor to come back?
When Struss was getting 4 after 4s in his leg side- did any one see Basher to take initiative to seal that HOLE? Did any one see Basher to talk to his bowler at least once?
As a captain Basher saw with us how Hamirson was taken off after Ashrafs' treatment.
9 players contributed 58 runs in last ODI against England. Our goal should be taking lesson from these matches. Who we can use instead of Baisa. ODIs are game of runs- not wickets.
I will not pray for anything else other than consistency in the bats of Ashraf, Aftab, Javed followed by inconsistency in the bats of Nafis (not a single good score!), Tushar and others who continues to work against their 'name'.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old June 23, 2005, 01:11 PM
sham1980 sham1980 is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 6, 2005
Location: London
Posts: 377

Why did he not go around the wicket ? he couldnt have done any worse. why did Bashar not try Ashraful he couldnt have done any worse.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 23, 2005, 01:14 PM
BanglarBir BanglarBir is offline
Street Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 30, 2005
Posts: 31

As you have explained they are both to blame for BD's poor performance. Bashar has shown no leadership skills throughout this tour. He has no willingness to learn from the best.

Should we give Shadat a chance (perhaps)?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 23, 2005, 01:28 PM
fwullah's Avatar
fwullah fwullah is offline
First BC Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: A successful cricketer
Posts: 6,545

Yes, it was a 'total team effort'.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 23, 2005, 02:52 PM
feisal feisal is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 26, 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 495

if one follows bashar's captaincy..he seldom if ever goes out for a sixth bowler...

aftab was almost a sixth bowler when got that 5 wickets.. but rajin was the captain on that day...

in fact, it might be possible, even before the innings underways, to predict who will bowl what over...

he could have brought Mashrafi just after the fall of Flintoff..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 23, 2005, 02:56 PM
TheWatcher TheWatcher is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 20, 2005
Posts: 4,782

We lost the match due to lack of team effort (or our team's limitations), but it was Bashar who let England come so close to four hundred runs through his unimaginative captaincy.

Edited on, June 23, 2005, 7:57 PM GMT, by TheWatcher.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 23, 2005, 02:56 PM
Rubu's Avatar
Rubu Rubu is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: February 15, 2004
Location: Michigan
Favorite Player: Mashrafee Mortaza
Posts: 8,361

In that day, no other experiment would hurt. i mean what would be worse? they were scoring freely anyway. so, trying out ash for an over or two was not a bad idea. bashar never did that. since we do not have a option to change the captain now we have to stick to bashar but dav should work on his captaincy as well. may be going over the video latter on and tell him what could he do differently and stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old June 23, 2005, 05:27 PM
Mav's Avatar
Mav Mav is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: December 23, 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
Favorite Player: Alastair Cook
Posts: 1,185

The answer is Bashar. A bowler might get beaten, and then may come back. But its the job of the captain to figure out ways to slow opponent`s run rate, and bashar didnt bother.

If a bowler is going for runs, it`s absolutely fair (common sense) to try a parttime bowler in an ODI. In other words, Tapash could also get some rest. He could think how to do better in his next over, but Bashar DOESN`T GET this pressure role on the bowlers.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old June 23, 2005, 07:45 PM
GuruTM's Avatar
GuruTM GuruTM is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 30, 2005
Location: বলা যাবে না।
Favorite Player: আশরাফুল
Posts: 960

Bashar is ruining this team's morale and destroying young bowler's carrer. His IQ level is too low as far as i understand. Then he cant call a toss properly.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket