facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 24, 2006, 03:20 AM
Shakalaka Shakalaka is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: June 25, 2005
Posts: 300
Default Rajin and Nazmul OUT! Manjar Rana & Tapash In!

Just heard on NTV~!
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old February 24, 2006, 03:25 AM
Shakalaka Shakalaka is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: June 25, 2005
Posts: 300

Bangladesh squad:

12th man Squad

Habibul Bashar (captain)
Khaled Mashud
Javed Omar
Mohammad Ashraful
Aftab Ahmed
Alok Kapali
Shahriar Nafees
Mohammad Rafique
Mashrafe Mortaza
Manjural Islam Rana
Syed Rasel
Tapash Baisya.

whos going to be super sub?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 24, 2006, 03:26 AM
sabbir ahmad's Avatar
sabbir ahmad sabbir ahmad is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: December 12, 2005
Location: chittagong
Posts: 411

super sub:Tapash Baisya.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old February 24, 2006, 03:39 AM
Mon's Avatar
Mon Mon is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: August 9, 2004
Favorite Player: sreesanth
Posts: 674

Good move indeed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old February 24, 2006, 03:43 AM
tanvir_nus's Avatar
tanvir_nus tanvir_nus is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 17, 2005
Location: the heart of the tiger
Favorite Player: Taskin Ahmed - TazKing
Posts: 2,810

Would rather have rana as the super sub and tapash in the team instead of nazmul. But ommitting Saleh and Nazmul is a very good decision and bringing back Rana is even better. Always been a supporter of Rana's inclusion in the team. But not sure about taposh, his economy rate has always been bad. What happenned to Rajib???
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old February 24, 2006, 04:09 AM
Lasker Lasker is offline
Street Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 5, 2005
Location: Beijing
Posts: 26

Gud move indeed but super sub must be Rana. Can't afford to take ricks Tapash as super sub.

If we win the toss, most probably going to field first, so a bowling super sub will be totally useless. And going to match with two pacers wud be higly risky. Rana as supersub would be useful either way batting or fielding first.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old February 24, 2006, 04:14 AM
nannu's Avatar
nannu nannu is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: June 16, 2005
Location: europe
Favorite Player: mortaza and saqibul
Posts: 1,206

if fielding first let tapash ball 5 over than bring rana in.
if batting first let rana bat and than let him ball 5 overs than bring tapash in.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old February 24, 2006, 04:16 AM
nannu's Avatar
nannu nannu is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: June 16, 2005
Location: europe
Favorite Player: mortaza and saqibul
Posts: 1,206

our only headache is now who is gonna be the 3rd position batsman, cause nobody did good job in this position. bashar did good job once upon a time but that is long ago.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old February 24, 2006, 04:23 AM
Lasker Lasker is offline
Street Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 5, 2005
Location: Beijing
Posts: 26

Quote:
Originally posted by nannu
our only headache is now who is gonna be the 3rd position batsman, cause nobody did good job in this position. bashar did good job once upon a time but that is long ago.
I would prefer Aftab as one down if we bat first. If we bat next I would like to gamble playing Rafique or Masrafe considering RRR, if RRR is less we play Pilot or Rana.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old February 24, 2006, 04:28 AM
howzatt!'s Avatar
howzatt! howzatt! is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: December 23, 2004
Posts: 1,301

Quote:
Originally posted by nannu
if fielding first let tapash ball 5 over than bring rana in.
if batting first let rana bat and than let him ball 5 overs than bring tapash in.
interesting. not a bad idea at all. however if tapash bowls first 5 overs well, we could give him more than 5 overs and bring rana in for batting. kapali is available as a back up spinner. however if pitch is spinner friendly and tapash is not doing well, we could give more than 5 overs to rana. i like your idea.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old February 24, 2006, 04:32 AM
Lasker Lasker is offline
Street Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 5, 2005
Location: Beijing
Posts: 26

Quote:
Originally posted by howzatt!
Quote:
Originally posted by nannu
if fielding first let tapash ball 5 over than bring rana in.
if batting first let rana bat and than let him ball 5 overs than bring tapash in.
interesting. not a bad idea at all. however if tapash bowls first 5 overs well, we could give him more than 5 overs and bring rana in for batting. kapali is available as a back up spinner. however if pitch is spinner friendly and tapash is not doing well, we could give more than 5 overs to rana. i like your idea.

To make this happen Rana shud be the super sub not Tapash. But seems managemnt is going for Tapash as super sub~
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old February 24, 2006, 09:32 AM
sadi's Avatar
sadi sadi is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Location: In my room
Favorite Player: Mushi
Posts: 6,709

Quote:
Originally posted by nannu
if fielding first let tapash ball 5 over than bring rana in.
if batting first let rana bat and than let him ball 5 overs than bring tapash in.
that doesnt make sense.... you have to choose your supersub before the toss and you cant choose both... so you have to decide who you wanna use as the supersub... if you choose tapash... then bowling first you have to forget about him cuz we will need rana's batting... batting first however would allow us to use him

using rana as supersub, you can let tapash bowl 5-6 over and then bring rana...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old February 24, 2006, 09:37 AM
green_cat's Avatar
green_cat green_cat is offline
Street Cricketer
 
Join Date: September 3, 2004
Posts: 970

difinitely a good move...i like it
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old February 24, 2006, 09:39 AM
Mahmood's Avatar
Mahmood Mahmood is offline
Administrator
Operations & Administrations
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Favorite Player: Mashrafe Mortaza
Posts: 7,825

Rana can not be supersub. He is valuable with both bat and ball. It will have to be Nafees and Taposh combo, depending on the pitch, one of them should be supersub, but losing toss may mean we never use Taposh.

However, being the genious our team think tank proved to be, they will probably make Rana supersub and miss out either his bating or bowling.

Edited on, February 24, 2006, 2:40 PM GMT, by Mahmood.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old February 24, 2006, 09:39 AM
green_cat's Avatar
green_cat green_cat is offline
Street Cricketer
 
Join Date: September 3, 2004
Posts: 970

Quote:
Originally posted by nannu
our only headache is now who is gonna be the 3rd position batsman, cause nobody did good job in this position. bashar did good job once upon a time but that is long ago.
surely rana will do it...he was successfull at this position before...he scored 60+ runs.cant remeber where...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old February 24, 2006, 09:46 AM
sar2005's Avatar
sar2005 sar2005 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 1, 2005
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 2,539

Alright, it's for sure that either rana or taposh would be the super sub. What would be the scenarios -

Scenario 1. (super sub - taposh)
If Bangladesh bat first, it is good. If ban bat second (which we wish), how Taposh can be used.

Scenario 2. (super sub - Rana)
If Bangladesh bowl first, it would be good. Use taposh for early overs than bring rana in. But if we need to bat first, can we enjoy the batting service from rana?

So, I guess, it all depends on the toss.

Let's hope to win the toss and put SL in again. Good luck Bashu. Do it for 3rd times in a row.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old February 24, 2006, 09:47 AM
Ahmed_B's Avatar
Ahmed_B Ahmed_B is offline
BanglaCricket Staff
 
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Posts: 5,578

Rajin & Nazmul were probably the weakest points in the team.. not a bad idea to replace them .. only makes the team more stable. I like it.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old February 24, 2006, 09:48 AM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 18,718

Quote:
Originally posted by nannu
if fielding first let tapash ball 5 over than bring rana in.
if batting first let rana bat and than let him ball 5 overs than bring tapash in.
You want both Way?

If true, I am happy, becuase I would do the same if we have to choose only from the selected 14. Also I would select Rana as super sub.

Case I: Bangladesh field first
With the assumption that if Bangladesh field first, I would select Rana as the super-sub. beacuse of recent history, Tapash may again be wicket taker but expensive. In that case bashar can bring Rana on after tapash's initial 5/6 overs and let Rana bowl the rest. If Tapash bowl economicaly, then Bashar can bring Rana in the 2nd Innings of the game for batting instead of Rasel.

Case II: Bangladesh bat first
If Bangladesh bats first, then bashar can wait up to fall of 6th wicket, to decide if really need another bat or not, before bringing Rana in. They may not need Rana's bat. In that case Rana can be used in the game's second innings replacing any ineffective bowler.


Edited on, February 24, 2006, 2:53 PM GMT, by Fazal.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old February 24, 2006, 09:58 AM
Upal Upal is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 27, 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 169

maybe the think tank feels that Taposh is an all-rounder now. His batting on occasion has been quite solid. The pitch curator has gone on record saying the pitch has a lot of green and should provide for good bounce. If this is the case, I don't see why we need rana's spin to be in the regular 11 when we are fielding. I would prefer Rana to be the super-sub and have Tapah bowl out his full quota. This is assuming we get to bowl first again.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old February 24, 2006, 10:04 AM
Sauron's Avatar
Sauron Sauron is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 26, 2005
Location: মেক্সিকো'র কয়েকশ' মাইল উপরে
Posts: 2,061

Great move by the selectors

Akram Khan, albeit a good batsman, was not a shrewd captain. In BD home matches, he used to take pointers from the crowd. If crowd chanted for some bowling change or fielding placement, you'd see Akram embracing those advice (If I may call it that). It is sometimes easier to see the big picture when you are not in the middle of it ... and Dhaka Stadium Cricket fans are no dummy.

For the last year, increasingly, I have had the feeling that BanglaCricket is visited by many of our cricketers and team management including selectors and possibly coaches. Mods/WebMasters/BC Staff may know how accurate it is. But it seems to me the good thoughtful fans of BC has started to have some impact, however indirectly. A positive impact of our collective goodwill, the desire to win and the never-dying optimism.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old February 24, 2006, 10:34 AM
Sham Sham is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: October 15, 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,070

Quote:
Originally posted by Mahmood
Rana can not be supersub. He is valuable with both bat and ball. It will have to be Nafees and Taposh combo, depending on the pitch, one of them should be supersub, but losing toss may mean we never use Taposh.

However, being the genious our team think tank proved to be, they will probably make Rana supersub and miss out either his bating or bowling.

Edited on, February 24, 2006, 2:40 PM GMT, by Mahmood.
I totally disagree!

Rana is by far the best person to have as the supersub!

If we lose the toss and have to bat first, hopefully we wont need him but if we do, we can bring him in and take out a pacer - a third pacer wont be as important for us anyway if we dont get to bowl first so we can easily sacrfice taposh and bring in Rana if our batting is struggling.

However, if we do win the toss and bowl first, its likely that Rasel will again bowl ten overs straight, so in the 20th over, we can substitute Rana for Rasel and he can bowl and bat both!

What the hell is the point of having Nafees or Taposh as supersubs? It will only work if we win the toss. If we lose we are screwed both ways!!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old February 24, 2006, 10:39 AM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 18,718

Quote:
Originally posted by Sham
However, if we do win the toss and bowl first, its likely that Rasel will again bowl ten overs straight, so in the 20th over, we can substitute Rana for Rasel and he can bowl and bat both!
If after 20th over ( asuming Rasel finished his 10m overs) you bring in Rana for Rasel , rana cannot bowl a single over as he is replacing Rasel.

However I agree, (unfortunately) Rana may be the best choice for super-sub for this game.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old February 24, 2006, 10:40 AM
DJ Sahastra DJ Sahastra is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: July 20, 2004
Location: US
Posts: 2,860

The supersub for BD team should be a genuine batsman or a batsman all-rounder.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old February 24, 2006, 10:42 AM
Sauron's Avatar
Sauron Sauron is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 26, 2005
Location: মেক্সিকো'র কয়েকশ' মাইল উপরে
Posts: 2,061

Edited on, February 24, 2006, 4:02 PM GMT, by Sauron.
Reason: deleted this post, coz after reading this I realized I have been brain-dead since this morning. Apologies for writing non-sense. Apologies to Sham if you have already read my post. But if you have not, then don't worry, I was praising you
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old February 24, 2006, 10:42 AM
Rubu's Avatar
Rubu Rubu is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: February 15, 2004
Location: Michigan
Favorite Player: Mashrafee Mortaza
Posts: 8,361

Quote:
Originally posted by Sham
However, if we do win the toss and bowl first, its likely that Rasel will again bowl ten overs straight, so in the 20th over, we can substitute Rana for Rasel and he can bowl and bat both!
Not possible. According to super sub rule: The sub will carry the bowling qouta. in other words, if russel bowls 10 over and then substituted with rana, rana will not be allowed to bowl at all. if russel bowls 9 overs, rana can bowl 1 overs and so on.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket