facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 29, 2006, 12:06 AM
Mr-Cricket's Avatar
Mr-Cricket Mr-Cricket is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: April 8, 2006
Location: Melbourne
Favorite Player: Ricky Ponting
Posts: 1,021
Exclamation 'Tiger fined for dissent' - Fox Sports

Tiger fined for dissent
April 29, 2006


BANGLADESH opening batsman Shahriar Nafees was fined 20 percent of his match fee for dissent in his side's nine-wicket defeat against Australia in the final one-dayer overnight.

Shahriar was found guilty of dissent by match referee Jeff Crowe in a hearing after play in which he had been dismissed lbw for a duck on the third ball of the innings to Aussie left-armer Mitchell Johnson.

An ICC statement said the player admitted to a breach of 1.3 of the ICC Code which relates to "showing dissent at an umpire's decision by action or verbal abuse".

"The offence related to his reaction when he was given out leg before wicket to the third ball of the match. Shahriar shook his head and gestured with his bat towards the Bangladesh dressing room as he left the field," said the statement.
In explaining his decision, Crowe said: "The player admitted what he had done was wrong and I took this, together with his previously exemplary conduct, into account. "However, it is important to show that dissent of any sort at an umpire's decision is unacceptable and the player's punishment for his actions illustrates that fact."

The charge was brought by on-field umpires Ian Howell and Nadir Shah and television umpire AFM Akhtaruddin and Crowe reached his conclusion after a hearing also attended by the three officials, Bangladesh manager Mohammad Shafique-ul-Huque and coach Dav Whatmore.

Agence France-Presse


__________________
Dare to dream.

Last edited by Mr-Cricket; April 29, 2006 at 12:17 AM..
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old April 29, 2006, 12:17 AM
mhferdaus mhferdaus is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: September 3, 2005
Posts: 783

hmm ricky also showed dissent and got fined at least he got the right decision in the end, so ricky 1 nafees 0
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 29, 2006, 01:41 AM
tanvir_nus's Avatar
tanvir_nus tanvir_nus is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 17, 2005
Location: the heart of the tiger
Favorite Player: Taskin Ahmed - TazKing
Posts: 2,779

Hail Nafees!!!!... see my signature to understand what I mean... be a real tiger... don't accept any more bad decisions!!!
__________________
Taskin Ahmed Tazim : 143 KPH - 18 years - Against Aussies - 1st April, 2014
148 KPH - 20 years - Against Pak At Dhaka - 2nd March 2016
150 KPH - Coming Soon.. Will be the first Bangladeshi
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 29, 2006, 07:28 AM
Hatebreed's Avatar
Hatebreed Hatebreed is offline
BC T-Shirt Design Winner
 
Join Date: June 19, 2005
Location: Camden, London
Favorite Player: Mashrafe Mortaza
Posts: 7,200

I say well done Nafees. If I was him I'd take off my helmet first.
__________________
My photography
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 29, 2006, 07:44 AM
Sovik's Avatar
Sovik Sovik is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Favorite Player: Brian Charles Lara
Posts: 9,241

what a rule? all this time we are getting decisions against us and if we show some disappointment, we get punished.
__________________
All I know about boxing is never bet on the white guy. - Frank Drebin
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old April 29, 2006, 01:29 PM
zakirc's Avatar
zakirc zakirc is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 7, 2006
Location: Muhammadpur, Dhaka
Posts: 900

I really dont see exactly where SN showed dissent. Instead he was actually smiling!! Dissent needs better clarification. Compared to what Ricky Ponting did the punishment is not fair. A player can shake his head for many reasons. Aussie & English players do the same all the time and every time they get away and rightfully so. What Ponting did was real dissent and compared to SN's punishment Ponting was just given a slap on the wrist!!

I am Disghusted by the activities of ICC.....international চোর কাউন্সিল!!
__________________
No signature. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old April 29, 2006, 01:39 PM
Hatebreed's Avatar
Hatebreed Hatebreed is offline
BC T-Shirt Design Winner
 
Join Date: June 19, 2005
Location: Camden, London
Favorite Player: Mashrafe Mortaza
Posts: 7,200

ICC = International Cricket Culprits
__________________
My photography
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old April 29, 2006, 01:41 PM
cricket_pagol's Avatar
cricket_pagol cricket_pagol is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: July 20, 2004
Location: Indiana
Favorite Player: Mashrafee & Shakib
Posts: 6,067

I was kinda asumed to read this... ricky was not even reported by the on field umpires, and poor SN got into trouble for shaking his head. I guess the showing the bat to the bangladeshi dressing room got him into trouble.

If the umpires give a horrible decision, which they did, then it is natural for players to get frustrated!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old April 29, 2006, 02:51 PM
sar2005's Avatar
sar2005 sar2005 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 1, 2005
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 2,540

Was ponting fined when he commented to umpire during first ODI after getting LBW to Razzak? Video clearly shows that he was saying something to the umpire while leaving the ground.

I think if Ponting was given an LBW like Nafees, he would definitley force umpire to consult with third umpire.
__________________
Subhanallah! Al-Hamdulillah!! AllahuAkbar!!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old April 29, 2006, 02:58 PM
al Furqaan's Avatar
al Furqaan al Furqaan is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 23,329

shaking his head and pointing his bat towards the dressing room???

perhaps the ICC should look at a tape of ron artest to see what true sporting deviant behavior is.

this is pure BS, i woulda done 10 times worse than nafees...do you know how many ducks SN has picked up this series due to shady calls??

could there be a conspiracy to keep bangladesh players under a 30 batting average???

with this ridiculous decision, SN now has a 29 ODI average. could easily have been past 30 had he scored even 15 runs.
__________________
Bangladesh: Our Dream, Our Joy, Our Team

#OneTeam1Dream
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old April 29, 2006, 07:55 PM
akabir77's Avatar
akabir77 akabir77 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 23, 2004
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Favorite Player: Nantu Ghotok
Posts: 10,876

my question is why wasn't the ump fined? I mean he destroid the whole inn for bd and acording to the importance of the wicket/situation ump should be fined too
__________________
1. Shahadat Hossain: Mufambisi c Mashud; Chigumbura lbw; Utseya c Mashud
2.
Abdur Razzak: P Utseya caught; RW Price lbw; CB Mpofu lbw
3. Rubel Hossain: Corey J A bowled; BB McCullum caught; JDS Neesham caught
4.
Taijul Islam: T Panyangara bowled; J Nyumbu lbw; TL Chatara bowled
5.
Taskin Ahmed: DAS Gunaratne c Soumya; Lakmal c fiz; Pradeep bowled
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old April 29, 2006, 08:57 PM
LateCut's Avatar
LateCut LateCut is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: February 4, 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,386

I watched him too. He shook his head and smiled. As if to say 'You got that one wrong'. Then walked to the pavalion. I do not remember seeing the raised bat. But he just could have been indicating to Aftab (as they crossed) that the ball nicked the bat! I do not know what TI was sorry about!

We should get a fund collection going and replace his 20% match fee.

Last edited by LateCut; April 29, 2006 at 09:17 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old April 29, 2006, 09:10 PM
Mon's Avatar
Mon Mon is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: August 9, 2004
Favorite Player: sreesanth
Posts: 674

total BS. Why not fine the umpires who make stupid decisions. I think confusing LBW decisions should ultimately go to the 3rd umpires discretion. Some might argue that it will take excitement out of the game but it's also not amusing to lose a valueable wicket due to a poor umpiring decision. I hope it was Ian Howell and not Nadir Shah who gave that LBW decision. if was Nadir Shah, then we will have a hemorrhage apiece....
__________________
"Rebuffed the big wind. My heart in hiding......
Times told lovelier, more dangerous, O my chevalier!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old April 29, 2006, 09:39 PM
cricket_pagla's Avatar
cricket_pagla cricket_pagla is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 28, 2005
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: The Narail Express
Posts: 662

cooool... but.. if u do dis kinda thing... again u'll b punished...
__________________
lost in the light of the moon, that comes through my window...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old April 30, 2006, 01:27 AM
Niceman70 Niceman70 is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: April 30, 2005
Location: NYC, USA
Favorite Player: Tamim and Shakib
Posts: 480

why the media is so quite? cricketnext.com would say soo much if that had happened to india.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old May 1, 2006, 06:55 PM
Frost's Avatar
Frost Frost is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 10, 2005
Location: Chandler, AZ, USA
Posts: 646

I would not have any problem with such decision if such decisions were given fairly and consistently against every player or country. Unfortunately, most of the times these decisions are applied harshly on lowly ranked teams and their players. Even though a lot of "politically correct" people will argue with "human error" type BS; I believe the fact shows that we (and some other lowly ranked teams) are the victims most of the times. It is time to speak out and also time to take serious measures against those "consistently" poor umpires and match referees. ICC should do something about it before it is too late. Since cricketers and team managements are tightly bound by ICC code of conduct, the sports reporters should come up and report these incidents (inconsistencies) more aggressively for the good of the game. Only then ICC will pay attention to these problems.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket