facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 6, 2006, 12:46 AM
Tendulkar_Mcgrath's Avatar
Tendulkar_Mcgrath Tendulkar_Mcgrath is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 26, 2006
Location: Newyork,USA
Favorite Player: Sakib,Tamim, Mashrafe
Posts: 1,686
Default Why Sakib al Hasan didnot get a chance?

we were arguing about forhad reza....
and now world is watching what he is...

we were sure about our ashraful's magic
still now we r searching it if we have patience enough....

we have choosen mushfiq rahim as a silent spectrator..
i think he only will get chance if pilot has decided 2 ball...


the big tigers have forgotten how to roar... i think selector faruk, coach Dev and mr lobby are feeding tigers grasses only....

now come 2 my topic....

why sakib al hasan didnot get chance?????? i dont think anybody would have opposed..if he had got a chance!!!

would u??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 6, 2006, 11:10 AM
fwullah's Avatar
fwullah fwullah is offline
First BC Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: A successful cricketer
Posts: 6,545

Sakib did well today, considering its his debut match and we're playing a pressure game vs. Zimbabwe.
__________________
I wish we could beat Australia in a Test Match!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 6, 2006, 11:48 AM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 15,874

Why Sakib al Hasan didnot get a chance?

Because the team selectors are lacking two things: a)"Ghilu" and b) "Buker Pata"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 6, 2006, 11:52 AM
sar2005's Avatar
sar2005 sar2005 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 1, 2005
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 2,540

Ghilu - that covers everything!! Shob potoler dol..........need a change now in the S comittee.
__________________
Subhanallah! Al-Hamdulillah!! AllahuAkbar!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 6, 2006, 12:05 PM
akabir77's Avatar
akabir77 akabir77 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 23, 2004
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Favorite Player: Nantu Ghotok
Posts: 10,772

how come u people have such short memory? not long ago this bangladesh team had the highest debu's given by any team in the shortest time and result we all know... now after one series we want to go back to that agian? every match 2 debu? cause there will be some players who wont score so drop them and take new faces?? what a idea... friend find some thing new that idea already been tried by other selectors and failed...
but i do agree these selectors have less talent.. they just can't chg the game plan right after 1 game they wait until its too late.....
__________________
1. Shahadat Hossain: Mufambisi c Mashud; Chigumbura lbw; Utseya c Mashud
2.
Abdur Razzak: P Utseya caught; RW Price lbw; CB Mpofu lbw
3. Rubel Hossain: Corey J A bowled; BB McCullum caught; JDS Neesham caught
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 6, 2006, 12:05 PM
akabir77's Avatar
akabir77 akabir77 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 23, 2004
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Favorite Player: Nantu Ghotok
Posts: 10,772

how come u people have such short memory? not long ago this bangladesh team had the highest debu's given by any team in the shortest time and result we all know... now after one series we want to go back to that agian? every match 2 debu? cause there will be some players who wont score so drop them and take new faces?? what a idea... friend find some thing new that idea already been tried by other selectors and failed...
but i do agree these selectors have less talent.. they just can't chg the game plan right after 1 game they wait until its too late.....
__________________
1. Shahadat Hossain: Mufambisi c Mashud; Chigumbura lbw; Utseya c Mashud
2.
Abdur Razzak: P Utseya caught; RW Price lbw; CB Mpofu lbw
3. Rubel Hossain: Corey J A bowled; BB McCullum caught; JDS Neesham caught
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 6, 2006, 02:19 PM
cracky's Avatar
cracky cracky is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: December 18, 2004
Location: San Andreas
Posts: 668

sakib and reza should have been included since the first match, or at least from second. But the selectors does not have any ghilu. I am sure on the first match against Kenya they will again keep Sakib(or even Reza) out of the first 11. After 2 defeat they might again include them.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 6, 2006, 03:16 PM
Haradhon Haradhon is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: July 19, 2004
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 1,713

Sakib has not been tested yet, because the 5th ODI was about salvaging some pride, and there was no pressure on our players. I was surprised by Rajin's 4/16 records - can he repeat it?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old August 6, 2006, 03:21 PM
cricket_pagol's Avatar
cricket_pagol cricket_pagol is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: July 20, 2004
Location: Indiana
Favorite Player: Mashrafee & Shakib
Posts: 6,016

BECAUSE, sakib does not have chacha/mama/relative in BCCB!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old August 6, 2006, 08:11 PM
baisab's Avatar
baisab baisab is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: February 3, 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 230

Quote:
Originally Posted by cricket_pagol
BECAUSE, sakib does not have chacha/mama/relative in BCCB!
SO true, there is too much nepotism in the selection comittee , come to think of, our whole country runs on "mamu bhagna" phylosophy
__________________
Treat others how you want to be treated
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old August 6, 2006, 08:21 PM
CricTiger's Avatar
CricTiger CricTiger is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: August 28, 2005
Posts: 835

Quote:
Originally Posted by baisab
SO true, there is too much nepotism in the selection comittee , come to think of, our whole country runs on "mamu bhagna" phylosophy
In this beautiful country of ours, everything is possible here. How come S are getting 90k/month from the board and keep doing business with the board? Do they ever heard the term, conflict of interests?
__________________
When it is obvious that the goals cannot be reached, don't adjust the goals, adjust the action steps.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old August 7, 2006, 01:54 AM
Tendulkar_Mcgrath's Avatar
Tendulkar_Mcgrath Tendulkar_Mcgrath is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 26, 2006
Location: Newyork,USA
Favorite Player: Sakib,Tamim, Mashrafe
Posts: 1,686

friends.... sorry for being late...but i posted it before the 5th match...and at the 5th match they took sakib....and the result u r watching!!...

i think these selectors r completely corrupted....i donno how they r..but if u bring incidents about cricket of bangladesh and logic together.... u will definitely find it..

what people like us oriented less than them in cricket are able to see whats happening and why and understand need of innovation.....they r not realizing it....dont they know what we know...its nothing like that....so they r corrupted ..and i can bet..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old August 7, 2006, 02:02 AM
sunny747's Avatar
sunny747 sunny747 is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 10, 2004
Posts: 1,927

that's the million dollar question why sakib was not in the team.....obviously he could have easily replaced instead of aalok.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old August 7, 2006, 02:25 AM
Dhakablues's Avatar
Dhakablues Dhakablues is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: December 25, 2004
Location: EverGreen State, USA
Favorite Player: Mashrafee
Posts: 4,263

Wait a min here.. why are you blaming the selectors again? Arent they the ones who selected Saqib and Forhad for this tour? Isnt the Skipper ( and in Bangladesh's case, Coach) decide who is in the playing 11? Are you not barking at the wrong tree?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old August 7, 2006, 04:23 AM
PoorFan PoorFan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: June 15, 2004
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 14,335

Why Sakib al Hasan didnot get a chance?

Because one hell of a lucky guy ( life long ) named Alok is there.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old August 7, 2006, 04:55 AM
thebest thebest is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 21, 2005
Location: in the blue planet
Posts: 3,805

Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorFan
Why Sakib al Hasan didnot get a chance?

Because one hell of a lucky guy ( life long ) named Alok is there.
you forgetting ash-fool
__________________
Twenty20 is not a gentleman's game. It's like a one-night stand and not a marriage. It is a street format and the goonda doesn't know what is a late cut or a cover drive
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old August 7, 2006, 07:10 AM
Sovik's Avatar
Sovik Sovik is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Favorite Player: Brian Charles Lara
Posts: 9,241

sakib & mushfiq is still young to play in national side. they are good players but are not mentally strong enough. just look at ashraful, nafess iqbal. what they had done in under 19 level were amazing but look at them now
__________________
All I know about boxing is never bet on the white guy. - Frank Drebin
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old August 7, 2006, 08:25 AM
Spitfire_x86's Avatar
Spitfire_x86 Spitfire_x86 is offline
Cricket Legend
Fantasy Winner: BD v NZ 2008
 
Join Date: December 17, 2004
Location: Dhaka
Posts: 7,650

Ashraful didn't do that well at U-19 level.
__________________
sig?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old August 7, 2006, 08:28 AM
Sovik's Avatar
Sovik Sovik is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Favorite Player: Brian Charles Lara
Posts: 9,241

but what about nafees iqbal.
__________________
All I know about boxing is never bet on the white guy. - Frank Drebin
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old August 7, 2006, 08:33 AM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 15,874

Quote:
Originally Posted by sovik
sakib & mushfiq is still young to play in national side. they are good players but are not mentally strong enough.
Can you please explain a lit-bit about your observation/comment? The reason I am asking to explain a lit-bit is upto now I though they are not tested/tried long enough to say either way if they are mentally strong enough or not in national level. I thought in lower level (u-19) they should they mental strength.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old August 7, 2006, 09:22 AM
Spitfire_x86's Avatar
Spitfire_x86 Spitfire_x86 is offline
Cricket Legend
Fantasy Winner: BD v NZ 2008
 
Join Date: December 17, 2004
Location: Dhaka
Posts: 7,650

Quote:
Originally Posted by sovik
but what about nafees iqbal.
He tried to become (or the team management wanted him to be) JO jnr. and paid the price for it.

Everyone can try to emulate JO, but JO's incredible luck cannot be inherited.
__________________
sig?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old August 7, 2006, 09:44 AM
Sovik's Avatar
Sovik Sovik is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Favorite Player: Brian Charles Lara
Posts: 9,241

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fazal
Can you please explain a lit-bit about your observation/comment? The reason I am asking to explain a lit-bit is upto now I though they are not tested/tried long enough to say either way if they are mentally strong enough or not in national level. I thought in lower level (u-19) they should they mental strength.
their mental toughness will be reflected when they will be playing against stronger team like australia, south africa england and others. Mushfiq scored a century in a practice match in england and he failed in the tests. its not his techniq that failed him, its the nerve. but if we have to test some youngstars, kenya and zimbabwe and other assocites are the right opponent
__________________
All I know about boxing is never bet on the white guy. - Frank Drebin
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old August 7, 2006, 09:56 AM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 15,874

Quote:
Originally Posted by sovik
their mental toughness will be reflected when they will be playing against stronger team like australia, south africa england and others. Mushfiq scored a century in a practice match in england and he failed in the tests. its not his techniq that failed him, its the nerve. but if we have to test some youngstars, kenya and zimbabwe and other assocites are the right opponent
Oh ok... based on few failures 1 year ago you think Mushfiq is still not strong enough. As far as I know in local series his lack of experience playing against good spinners and fast bowlers also showed up. He was nervous no doubt a year ago... but in this kind of ages... a lyear ater can make a big difference. I thought what he is missing is lack of experience against quality opponents more than his mental strength. I thought that one thing that he showed during his last few tours with u-19 and team-a is: he is very far ahead of his age, is his mental strength. I think he was pretty weak against quality spinners last year.

How about Sakib? You mentioned about Sakib's name also. Do you still beleive he also lacks mental strength?

However I agree with you partially that "if we have to test some youngstars, kenya and zimbabwe are the best team to test on" but also they should try them in ODI first rather than test. Rahim was tested in TEST first last year. That was another mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old August 7, 2006, 10:02 AM
Sovik's Avatar
Sovik Sovik is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Favorite Player: Brian Charles Lara
Posts: 9,241

sakib hasn't been tested yet. i am optimistic about him but think he is the kind of cricketer we need but we need to see him playing against kenya and ICC champions trophy to see if he is ready for the big league.

(seing Javed playing international level for so many years, i think everyone has a chance)
__________________
All I know about boxing is never bet on the white guy. - Frank Drebin
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old August 7, 2006, 10:13 AM
roi's Avatar
roi roi is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 4, 2004
Location: Japan
Posts: 574

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tendulkar_Mcgrath
why sakib al hasan didnot get chance?????? i dont think anybody would have opposed..if he had got a chance!!!

would u??
Wel, Sakib just only played 1 match...so seat back to your seat....Need more time to coment anything on him.Remember, it was not that much pressure match as like 4th ODI. Ash also scored 100 in his debue match or like that.
And please stop kicking selectors as*....This is really a thankless job apart with comission scandal.
__________________
Bangladesh looked on course for Test cricket's biggest upset after dominating the first two days' play by hitting 427 in their first innings and dismissing Australia for 269.
 Source>>
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket