Why Sakib al Hasan didnot get a chance?

Tendulkar_Mcgrath · #1 August 6, 2006, 12:46 AM

we were arguing about forhad reza....
and now world is watching what he is...

we were sure about our ashraful's magic
still now we r searching it if we have patience enough....

we have choosen mushfiq rahim as a silent spectrator..
i think he only will get chance if pilot has decided 2 ball...

the big tigers have forgotten how to roar... i think selector faruk, coach Dev and mr lobby are feeding tigers grasses only....

now come 2 my topic....

why sakib al hasan didnot get chance?????? i dont think anybody would have opposed..if he had got a chance!!!

would u??

fwullah · #2 August 6, 2006, 11:10 AM

Sakib did well today, considering its his debut match and we're playing a pressure game vs. Zimbabwe.

Fazal · #3 August 6, 2006, 11:48 AM

Why Sakib al Hasan didnot get a chance?

Because the team selectors are lacking two things: a)"Ghilu" and b) "Buker Pata"

sar2005 · #4 August 6, 2006, 11:52 AM

Ghilu - that covers everything!! Shob potoler dol..........need a change now in the S comittee.

akabir77 · #5 August 6, 2006, 12:05 PM

how come u people have such short memory? not long ago this bangladesh team had the highest debu's given by any team in the shortest time and result we all know... now after one series we want to go back to that agian? every match 2 debu? cause there will be some players who wont score so drop them and take new faces?? what a idea... friend find some thing new that idea already been tried by other selectors and failed...
but i do agree these selectors have less talent.. they just can't chg the game plan right after 1 game they wait until its too late.....

akabir77 · #6 August 6, 2006, 12:05 PM

how come u people have such short memory? not long ago this bangladesh team had the highest debu's given by any team in the shortest time and result we all know... now after one series we want to go back to that agian? every match 2 debu? cause there will be some players who wont score so drop them and take new faces?? what a idea... friend find some thing new that idea already been tried by other selectors and failed...
but i do agree these selectors have less talent.. they just can't chg the game plan right after 1 game they wait until its too late.....

cracky · #7 August 6, 2006, 02:19 PM

sakib and reza should have been included since the first match, or at least from second. But the selectors does not have any ghilu. I am sure on the first match against Kenya they will again keep Sakib(or even Reza) out of the first 11. After 2 defeat they might again include them.

Haradhon · #8 August 6, 2006, 03:16 PM

Sakib has not been tested yet, because the 5th ODI was about salvaging some pride, and there was no pressure on our players. I was surprised by Rajin's 4/16 records - can he repeat it?

cricket_pagol · #9 August 6, 2006, 03:21 PM

BECAUSE, sakib does not have chacha/mama/relative in BCCB!

baisab · #10 August 6, 2006, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cricket_pagol
BECAUSE, sakib does not have chacha/mama/relative in BCCB!

SO true, there is too much nepotism in the selection comittee

, come to think of, our whole country runs on "mamu bhagna" phylosophy

CricTiger · #11 August 6, 2006, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baisab
SO true, there is too much nepotism in the selection comittee

, come to think of, our whole country runs on "mamu bhagna" phylosophy

In this beautiful country of ours, everything is possible here. How come S are getting 90k/month from the board and keep doing business with the board? Do they ever heard the term, conflict of interests?

Tendulkar_Mcgrath · #12 August 7, 2006, 01:54 AM

friends.... sorry for being late...but i posted it before the 5th match...and at the 5th match they took sakib....and the result u r watching!!...

i think these selectors r completely corrupted....i donno how they r..but if u bring incidents about cricket of bangladesh and logic together.... u will definitely find it..

what people like us oriented less than them in cricket are able to see whats happening and why and understand need of innovation.....they r not realizing it....dont they know what we know...its nothing like that....so they r corrupted ..and i can bet..

sunny747 · #13 August 7, 2006, 02:02 AM

that's the million dollar question why sakib was not in the team.....obviously he could have easily replaced instead of aalok.

Dhakablues · #14 August 7, 2006, 02:25 AM

Wait a min here.. why are you blaming the selectors again? Arent they the ones who selected Saqib and Forhad for this tour? Isnt the Skipper ( and in Bangladesh's case, Coach) decide who is in the playing 11? Are you not barking at the wrong tree?

PoorFan · #15 August 7, 2006, 04:23 AM

Why Sakib al Hasan didnot get a chance?

Because one hell of a lucky guy ( life long ) named Alok is there.

thebest · #16 August 7, 2006, 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PoorFan
Why Sakib al Hasan didnot get a chance?

Because one hell of a lucky guy ( life long ) named Alok is there.

you forgetting ash-fool

Sovik · #17 August 7, 2006, 07:10 AM

sakib & mushfiq is still young to play in national side. they are good players but are not mentally strong enough. just look at ashraful, nafess iqbal. what they had done in under 19 level were amazing but look at them now

Spitfire_x86 · #18 August 7, 2006, 08:25 AM

Ashraful didn't do that well at U-19 level.

Sovik · #19 August 7, 2006, 08:28 AM

but what about nafees iqbal.

Fazal · #20 August 7, 2006, 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sovik
sakib & mushfiq is still young to play in national side. they are good players but are not mentally strong enough.

Can you please explain a lit-bit about your observation/comment? The reason I am asking to explain a lit-bit is upto now I though they are not tested/tried long enough to say either way if they are mentally strong enough or not in national level. I thought in lower level (u-19) they should they mental strength.

Spitfire_x86 · #21 August 7, 2006, 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sovik
but what about nafees iqbal.

He tried to become (or the team management wanted him to be) JO jnr. and paid the price for it.

Everyone can try to emulate JO, but JO's incredible luck cannot be inherited.

Sovik · #22 August 7, 2006, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fazal
Can you please explain a lit-bit about your observation/comment? The reason I am asking to explain a lit-bit is upto now I though they are not tested/tried long enough to say either way if they are mentally strong enough or not in national level. I thought in lower level (u-19) they should they mental strength.

their mental toughness will be reflected when they will be playing against stronger team like australia, south africa england and others. Mushfiq scored a century in a practice match in england and he failed in the tests. its not his techniq that failed him, its the nerve. but if we have to test some youngstars, kenya and zimbabwe and other assocites are the right opponent

Fazal · #23 August 7, 2006, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sovik
their mental toughness will be reflected when they will be playing against stronger team like australia, south africa england and others. Mushfiq scored a century in a practice match in england and he failed in the tests. its not his techniq that failed him, its the nerve. but if we have to test some youngstars, kenya and zimbabwe and other assocites are the right opponent

Oh ok... based on few failures 1 year ago you think Mushfiq is still not strong enough. As far as I know in local series his lack of experience playing against good spinners and fast bowlers also showed up. He was nervous no doubt a year ago... but in this kind of ages... a lyear ater can make a big difference. I thought what he is missing is lack of experience against quality opponents more than his mental strength. I thought that one thing that he showed during his last few tours with u-19 and team-a is: he is very far ahead of his age, is his mental strength. I think he was pretty weak against quality spinners last year.

How about Sakib? You mentioned about Sakib's name also. Do you still beleive he also lacks mental strength?

However I agree with you partially that "if we have to test some youngstars, kenya and zimbabwe are the best team to test on" but also they should try them in ODI first rather than test. Rahim was tested in TEST first last year. That was another mistake.

Sovik · #24 August 7, 2006, 10:02 AM

sakib hasn't been tested yet. i am optimistic about him but think he is the kind of cricketer we need but we need to see him playing against kenya and ICC champions trophy to see if he is ready for the big league.

(seing Javed playing international level for so many years, i think everyone has a chance)

roi · #25 August 7, 2006, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tendulkar_Mcgrath
why sakib al hasan didnot get chance?????? i dont think anybody would have opposed..if he had got a chance!!!

would u??

Wel, Sakib just only played 1 match...so seat back to your seat....Need more time to coment anything on him.Remember, it was not that much pressure match as like 4th ODI. Ash also scored 100 in his debue match or like that.
And please stop kicking selectors as*....This is really a thankless job apart with comission scandal.