facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 10, 2007, 08:21 PM
Farhad's Avatar
Farhad Farhad is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: December 11, 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Favorite Player: Sakibul Hasan
Posts: 2,815
Default West Indian wickets.....

I think this series proved to us one (and only one) thing. I dont think we've somehow gone worse in the space of just two months. All it shows us is that we are alot weaker in non-spinner-friendly wickets. Its no secret that our main bowling firepower (especially against Zim) comes from our spinners. This outcome is pretty simple IMO. The Zim tracks dont spin (according to cricinfo) whereas the subcontinental ones do. Thats the only reason we suddenly beat Zimbabwe by over a hundred runs in the Champions Trophy (subcontinental wicket) after a rather disappointing tour in zimbabwe just preceding that. The bad news, however, is that West Indian tracks are universally known to be fast-bowlers wickets i.e bouncy, hard ( Which means less traction and therefore, less spin )........We're gearing up for a pretty tough tournament in my opinion.......
__________________
^True dat^
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 10, 2007, 08:47 PM
Kabir's Avatar
Kabir Kabir is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: September 3, 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Favorite Player: Sakib - the real Tiger
Posts: 11,139

In today's match, Razzak has an economy rate of 3.60, after bowling 10 overs. The second best is Sakib, whose economy rate is 4.2 after bowling 10 overs. They both took 1 wicket each. Compare that with Mashrafee, Tapash and Shahadat. All of them have over 5 economy rate. Among these bowlers, Mashrafee got highest wickets - 3. But it came at the expense of some runs.

The reason I'm blabbering this much is because, may be a spinner-friendly wicket will make bowling difficult a little bit, but bowling good line, length, and tight...these are all upto the capabilities of the bowler. Even though we've got good spinners, we still have to rely on our pacers. And don't forget that the opponent teams have their own spinner attacks too.

So yes, although the wickets in WI may not be friendly for our spinners, they can nevertheless do their job moderately. We need a good batting lineup (which we have - but only disfunctional). Putting too much emphasis on our bowling attack (which IMO is 20 times better than our batting lineup) may put us back at square one.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 11, 2007, 05:09 AM
BD-Shardul BD-Shardul is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: October 16, 2006
Location: Doha, Qatar
Favorite Player: Mash,Shakib,Tamim
Posts: 7,046

I think WI wickets will produce bounce,as they are called juicy wickets.
This will also help in producing swing.

My assumption is that Aftab, Rasel, and Mortaza will do well in those wickets.

For Rafiq, and Rajjaq, wicket is not a matter. They will do well inshallah, and therefore BD should go with two spinners, regardless of wicket condition. Atleast they will check the flow of runs.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old February 11, 2007, 05:52 AM
nmhimal's Avatar
nmhimal nmhimal is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: June 2, 2004
Location: in the top end of Oz land
Favorite Player: Shakib Al Hasan
Posts: 268

First we have to think about India and Sri Lanka, they both are in our group in world cup, they have Harbhajan Singh, Anil Kumble and Murli, What they can do in a spin friendly wicket we all know, so don’t plead for the spinner haven in WI, I would prefer a pacer track, bouncy wicket, it will be good for our team, we have mortoza, rajib, taposh and sharif, and I want see Aftab bowling in world cup, why we are not using his talent, remember his best bowing against NZ, he had 5 wickets, so we should use him more and more, then we can have both of our spinner rafiq and razzak in our best 11. Also we have some good memory in WI, hope tigers will prove again what they are capable of.
__________________
Yes we can, C'mon tiger, C'mon

Last edited by nmhimal; February 11, 2007 at 07:16 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old February 11, 2007, 07:16 AM
BangladeshFan's Avatar
BangladeshFan BangladeshFan is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Posts: 2,106

most of the wickets are laid new i guess, so it is impossible to predict how they will behave. right thing is to take your best bowlers in the 15, covering all eventualities and then play an extra spinner or pacer depending on the track.

india/sl batsmen are adept at playing both pace and spin, so Bd shouldnt select the bowlers based on that. infact if u see their latest matches, pacers have gone for more runs than spinners.
__________________
When The Going Gets Tough, The Tough Gets Going.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old February 11, 2007, 07:59 AM
Sovik's Avatar
Sovik Sovik is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Favorite Player: Brian Charles Lara
Posts: 9,241

i read in an article, In last worldcup, ICC made sure the wickets are batting friendly and stays that way for 100 overs and i think ICC will do that again otherwise the pitches will be seamer friendly
__________________
All I know about boxing is never bet on the white guy. - Frank Drebin
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old February 11, 2007, 08:34 AM
Ahmed_B's Avatar
Ahmed_B Ahmed_B is offline
BanglaCricket Staff
 
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Posts: 5,566

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kabir
In today's match, Razzak has an economy rate of 3.60, after bowling 10 overs. The second best is Sakib, whose economy rate is 4.2 after bowling 10 overs. They both took 1 wicket each. Compare that with Mashrafee, Tapash and Shahadat. All of them have over 5 economy rate....
That might very well have been because of the ZIM player's lack of skills to play spin as well as their over-cautiousness because of previous bad experiences against BD spinners.

We should never really judge the ability of our spinners from how they did against these ZIM players. Personally... I would not expect any extra-ordinary performances from BD spinners in the WI wickets against India or SL. We do have to form an accurate and decent 3-Pacer battery for the WC if we want to make any good impression at all.
__________________
Well...you only get one chance to make your first impression somewhere...!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old February 11, 2007, 08:47 AM
Miraz's Avatar
Miraz Miraz is offline
BC Staff
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Mohammad Rafique
Posts: 14,895

The Wickets of Trinidad (where Bangladesh's match will be played) is more bouncy than some other Caribbean wickets.

Here's a post from a Caribbean member of another cricket forum

Quote:
Trinidad pitches as I have known possess high bounce and the Indians are a bit uncomfortable with that. Seeing India's poor record of playing in the Caribbean - although Trinidad has been one of their lucky venues - I think that SRI will top the group.
More about Trinidad
__________________
You only play good cricket when you win/draw matches.
I am with Bangladesh, whether they win or lose . http://twitter.com/BanglaCricket
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old February 11, 2007, 09:35 AM
akabir77's Avatar
akabir77 akabir77 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 23, 2004
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Favorite Player: Nantu Ghotok
Posts: 10,747

what i remember from our last tour is that the pitches r almost close to subcontient kind of wkt. they don't have fast wkts like australi, SA or NZ.

But this doesn't surve us as we will play the countries which r most adopt to spin and on top i think we r very bad playing good spin.
I think best players in BD team can play against spin are:
Ashrafool, Mushfiq and Hablu(some what) rest is not even tested. remember we played in fast track against srilanka in the last ICC match so most of our top player have no clue (or we don't have clue about them) how they will play against good spin or pace..
__________________
1. Shahadat Hossain: Mufambisi c Mashud; Chigumbura lbw; Utseya c Mashud
2.
Abdur Razzak: P Utseya caught; RW Price lbw; CB Mpofu lbw
3. Rubel Hossain: Corey J A bowled; BB McCullum caught; JDS Neesham caught
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old February 11, 2007, 12:01 PM
fwullah's Avatar
fwullah fwullah is offline
First BC Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: A successful cricketer
Posts: 6,545

When was Mushfiq tested?

Besides Ashraful, Aftab, and Bashar, rest is not even tested.
__________________
I wish we could beat Australia in a Test Match!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old February 11, 2007, 12:37 PM
akabir77's Avatar
akabir77 akabir77 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 23, 2004
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Favorite Player: Nantu Ghotok
Posts: 10,747

Quote:
Originally Posted by fwullah
When was Mushfiq tested?

Besides Ashraful, Aftab, and Bashar, rest is not even tested.
why in england...
__________________
1. Shahadat Hossain: Mufambisi c Mashud; Chigumbura lbw; Utseya c Mashud
2.
Abdur Razzak: P Utseya caught; RW Price lbw; CB Mpofu lbw
3. Rubel Hossain: Corey J A bowled; BB McCullum caught; JDS Neesham caught
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old February 11, 2007, 03:17 PM
TheWatcher TheWatcher is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 20, 2005
Posts: 4,782

This is from India's tour of West Indies, May 2006-
Quote:
The track at the Queen's Park Oval looks hard and dry. Chief curator Shekhar Mano, who has been working hard on the pitch, feels that the pitch would have something for both the bowlers and the batsmen.

''It's going to offer good bounce and carry. Even the spinners will get good bounce, though not much turn for them is at the offings" he said.

The whole square was re-laid seven months back and since then only one ODI has been played. The match between West Indies and Zimbabwe turned out to be low scoring one and the pitch was criticised for being low and slow.

- Source
Look at the scorecard of 5th ODI, how much Sreesanth, Munaf, and Bhajji struggled. If the pitch is still the same way, it probably won't offer much turn or bounce, kind a like our Fatullah pitch.

It may be very bad news for Shahadat, his short deliveries will just turn into waist high longhops to be whopped. If he still refuses to bowl at fuller lengths, it may be better for us to go with Tapash.

For our spinners, they depend more on the drift of the ball than turn. Most of the time they just skid the ball to batsmen (especially Sakib). As long the grass is trimmed off, they should be ok.

For our batsmen, they have to adapt to the pace of the pitch.

Last edited by TheWatcher; February 11, 2007 at 03:31 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old February 11, 2007, 03:58 PM
Tigers_eye's Avatar
Tigers_eye Tigers_eye is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: June 30, 2005
Location: Little Rock
Favorite Player: Viv Richards, Steve Waugh
Posts: 24,378

Port of Spain - Thats where we are playing, is a batting paradise. runs will be scored from 270 to 300. No amount of Shahadat, Taposh, Sharif, Dollar, Aftab or Reza can have a under 5.5 econ. 40 overs for Mash, rafiq, razzak, sakib. I'd depend on Reza and Shahadat for the remaining 10 overs. Sometimes Shahadat can give us the big blow and reza can swing the bat better than Taposh, Sharif, Dollar.

One must play with their strength. We can't worry what Murali and kumble will bring. That will be handled by our batsmen. What we bring will be handled by Dada, Tendu, Sangakkara.
__________________
The Weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is an attribute of the Strong." - Ghandi.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old February 11, 2007, 08:02 PM
sadi's Avatar
sadi sadi is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Location: In my room
Favorite Player: Mushi
Posts: 6,709

What worries me is our pacer's inability to use the seaming condition to their advantage. Shahadat thinks he can get everyone out with his short pitched stuff. He needs to grow up. Our third pacer issue is still not solved. But I don't think caribean wickets are as hard and bouncy as it used to be. It will be more in the slower side and should assist the spinners.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old February 11, 2007, 08:46 PM
cricketboy's Avatar
cricketboy cricketboy is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 4, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,776

Probably the West Indian wickets are getting less and less fast bowling friendly as years pass by. I remember even in 1997 the pitches were much more hostile and Ambrose and Walsh were enjoying it but in 2004 in the series against India except one pitch(probably the one in Trinidad ) the others were batting friendly.
__________________
~~^~~^~~^~~^~~^~~^~~^~~^~~
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old February 11, 2007, 10:53 PM
Farhad's Avatar
Farhad Farhad is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: December 11, 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Favorite Player: Sakibul Hasan
Posts: 2,815

Well, we'll find out in 14 days when we take on Bermuda......Hope our players can hit themselves back into form in the tri-nation series.
__________________
^True dat^
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old February 17, 2007, 01:22 PM
Mohiul's Avatar
Mohiul Mohiul is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 21, 2004
Location: Dagenham, Essex, UK
Favorite Player: Sakib Al Hasan
Posts: 3,233

Ganguly made a comment regarding WI playing conditions after today's last match of the series against SL. He said conditions gonna be same like India. As I know Indian playing conditions is spinner friendly. Then is the WI playing contitions spinners friendly? I can recall Scotland skipper told the same. That time I did take it lightly but after Ganguly's comment I'm confused. What do you think?

Quote:
"We're going to the World Cup in a good frame of mind. The wickets are going to be similar and we are quietly gelling into a very good outfit," he said.
Source: Ganguly's comment
__________________
Mohiul
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old February 17, 2007, 03:29 PM
TheWatcher TheWatcher is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 20, 2005
Posts: 4,782

England bowler Jon Lewis believes conditions in the West Indies will favour batsmen during the World Cup.

Listen to Jon Lewis' opion on West Indian wickets
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old February 23, 2007, 01:52 AM
Farhad's Avatar
Farhad Farhad is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: December 11, 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Favorite Player: Sakibul Hasan
Posts: 2,815
Default Murali on the pitch...

Everybody seems to have a different opinion. I guess we cant be certain about anything yet. Heres Murali's words on the pitch:

Quote:
With 432 one-day international wickets, it would be easy to pinpoint Muralitharan as a threat on the slow and low pitches in the West Indies, but he felt spinners would struggle. "The rules have changed now with the 20-over power plays coming so the spinners go out of the game, you can't play two or three spinners any more," he said. "We have only one spinner at the moment so fast bowlers have more chance [of success] because they bowl in the power play."
__________________
^True dat^
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old February 23, 2007, 09:31 AM
akabir77's Avatar
akabir77 akabir77 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 23, 2004
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Favorite Player: Nantu Ghotok
Posts: 10,747

well here is an article on ICC2007 website on WI pitches.. Like i said it will help spinners and swing bowlers and...
http://cricketworldcup.indya.com/Dis...ews_20070208_4


The nature of the pitches in the West Indies is akin to those in the sub-continent, especially India, with their dry and brittle surfaces. And though Windies bowling is associated with super quick bowlers from Wes Hall to Curtley Ambrose, spinners have also been successful in the Caribbean. The West Indies themselves have produced three of the greatest in Alf Valentine, Sonny Ramadhin and Lance Gibbs. But their successes have been in Test cricket. In the shorter version, it has been the lot of part-timers like Vivian Richards and Carl Hooper to play a supporting role to their awesome pace attack.


__________________
1. Shahadat Hossain: Mufambisi c Mashud; Chigumbura lbw; Utseya c Mashud
2.
Abdur Razzak: P Utseya caught; RW Price lbw; CB Mpofu lbw
3. Rubel Hossain: Corey J A bowled; BB McCullum caught; JDS Neesham caught
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old February 23, 2007, 11:50 AM
RazabQ's Avatar
RazabQ RazabQ is offline
Moderator
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: February 25, 2004
Location: Fremont CA
Posts: 10,049

Good find akabir. Interesting how on these Indo-centric sites (here, S. Rajesh pieces on CI), BD is not even an afterthought. We are complete non-mentions.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old February 23, 2007, 12:20 PM
akabir77's Avatar
akabir77 akabir77 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 23, 2004
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Favorite Player: Nantu Ghotok
Posts: 10,747

Quote:
Originally Posted by RazabQ
Good find akabir. Interesting how on these Indo-centric sites (here, S. Rajesh pieces on CI), BD is not even an afterthought. We are complete non-mentions.
What can you do with bias people...
__________________
1. Shahadat Hossain: Mufambisi c Mashud; Chigumbura lbw; Utseya c Mashud
2.
Abdur Razzak: P Utseya caught; RW Price lbw; CB Mpofu lbw
3. Rubel Hossain: Corey J A bowled; BB McCullum caught; JDS Neesham caught
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old February 24, 2007, 06:35 PM
RazabQ's Avatar
RazabQ RazabQ is offline
Moderator
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: February 25, 2004
Location: Fremont CA
Posts: 10,049

According to the tigercricket article, the Recreational ground - where we are playing Bermuda tomorrow - is spin friendly
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket