facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 19, 2009, 10:10 AM
Miraz's Avatar
Miraz Miraz is offline
BC Staff
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Mohammad Rafique
Posts: 14,901
Default Wickets of the Tri-series and Zim ODI series

I don't understand one thing. When our batting is regularly struggling, making batting friendly wickets make more sense, isn't it? why are we doing the opposites? Our bowling was always good in ODI, we needed some contribution from the batsmen and we are making their life difficult.

I don't understand what's going on in the mind of the Bangladesh management. They are making schoolboy errors and completely clueless.
__________________
You only play good cricket when you win/draw matches.
I am with Bangladesh, whether they win or lose . http://twitter.com/BanglaCricket
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 19, 2009, 10:45 AM
Tehsin Tehsin is offline
Administrator
BanglaCricket Founder
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Virginia, USA
Favorite Player: তামীম, শা
Posts: 9,471

This is the very reason I always hessitate to blame our players ( still do it anyways). We are not getting them equiped for the big league. Just throwing them out to play match after match against big teams isn't doing them any favor. On top of that, we are forcing them to play in conditions that are alien to them in their own backyard. I always blame Ash for not learning from his mistakes, it's hard to blame him when the folks who employ him lack vision and common sense.
__________________
Bangladesh - World Champions - World Cup 20**
বাংলাদেশ - বিশ্ব চাম্পিয়ন - বিশ্বকাপ ক্রিকেট ২০**
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 19, 2009, 10:47 AM
mahbubH's Avatar
mahbubH mahbubH is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Giggs, Gower, and Wasim!
Posts: 4,728

Thanks Miraz.. I was also thinking in the same line. Against a strong side a bowling friendly wicket certainly helps but against a weak side like Zimbabwe why don't they use a battaing paradise, I have no idea.
__________________
West Indies
Pakistan-India-Australia-SriLanka-SouthAfrica-NewZealand-WestIndies-England
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 19, 2009, 10:51 AM
tonoy's Avatar
tonoy tonoy is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: February 25, 2007
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Shakib Al Hasan
Posts: 7,663

That is a fair point. But do you honestly think that our batting would have done any better on a flat pitch? When your batting fails to score 200 after five or so matches, you know something is wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 19, 2009, 11:21 AM
Spitfire_x86's Avatar
Spitfire_x86 Spitfire_x86 is offline
Cricket Legend
Fantasy Winner: BD v NZ 2008
 
Join Date: December 17, 2004
Location: Dhaka
Posts: 7,650

I completely support making bowling pitches. Our bowling attack is totally useless in 300 total pitches, and our batsmen regularly get out for 100-150 scores even in very good batting conditions. At least making a bowling pitch increases chance of a win in case of an accidental half decent batting performance.

In 2008 we scored least runs per wicket and least runs per over in ODIs. Yes, even lower than Zimbabwe in both counts! One would expect a bunch of so called "too much shot playing", "talented" batsmen to score at a fairly decent pace even if they couldn't last very long in the wicket. They're just plain rubbish.

In a nutshell, I prefer 200-120 scoreline over 300/200 scoreline, because the 2nd target is too impossible even for an occasional fluky win.
__________________
sig?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 19, 2009, 12:22 PM
mijanur mijanur is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: April 11, 2008
Favorite Player: iqbal,ishant,southee
Posts: 1,406

the basic reason for this bangladeshi criketers are not worthy of holding a bat
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 19, 2009, 01:48 PM
Rifat's Avatar
Rifat Rifat is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: March 30, 2007
Location: Connecticut
Favorite Player: Hashim Amla
Posts: 10,667

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spitfire_x86
I completely support making bowling pitches. Our bowling attack is totally useless in 300 total pitches, and our batsmen regularly get out for 100-150 scores even in very good batting conditions. At least making a bowling pitch increases chance of a win in case of an accidental half decent batting performance.

In 2008 we scored least runs per wicket and least runs per over in ODIs. Yes, even lower than Zimbabwe in both counts! One would expect a bunch of so called "too much shot playing", "talented" batsmen to score at a fairly decent pace even if they couldn't last very long in the wicket. They're just plain rubbish.

In a nutshell, I prefer 200-120 scoreline over 300/200 scoreline, because the 2nd target is too impossible even for an occasional fluky win.
good post
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 19, 2009, 01:55 PM
Anher's Avatar
Anher Anher is offline
BC T20 WC 2012 Fantasy League Winner
 
Join Date: January 31, 2005
Posts: 3,158


কোন লাভ নাই। যেই লাউ সেই কদু।
আমরা ভুয়া।


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old January 19, 2009, 04:31 PM
nycpro96's Avatar
nycpro96 nycpro96 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: Albany
Favorite Player: Tamim Iqbal
Posts: 6,057

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spitfire_x86
I completely support making bowling pitches. Our bowling attack is totally useless in 300 total pitches, and our batsmen regularly get out for 100-150 scores even in very good batting conditions. At least making a bowling pitch increases chance of a win in case of an accidental half decent batting performance.

In 2008 we scored least runs per wicket and least runs per over in ODIs. Yes, even lower than Zimbabwe in both counts! One would expect a bunch of so called "too much shot playing", "talented" batsmen to score at a fairly decent pace even if they couldn't last very long in the wicket. They're just plain rubbish.

In a nutshell, I prefer 200-120 scoreline over 300/200 scoreline, because the 2nd target is too impossible even for an occasional fluky win.
this post is making a lot of sense
__________________
Reporter: You could hit the first ball for 4 couldn't you?
Tamim: Ha, I could hit the first ball for 6, that's not a problem.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket