facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 26, 2015, 01:48 PM
mufi_02's Avatar
mufi_02 mufi_02 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: August 2, 2011
Location: NY
Favorite Player: Lara, Shakib
Posts: 5,417
Default NEW ODI Rules -- Effective 5th July and onwards

Quote:
Revised Playing Conditions (In effect on or after 5th July 2015):

No compulsory catchers in overs 1-10 (ODIs)
No batting Powerplay between overs 15-40 (ODIs)
Five fielders allowed outside the 30-yard circle in overs 41-50 (ODIs)
All "no balls", not just "foot faults", to result in a free hit (ODIs & T20Is)
Quote:
The governing body of the sport notified that according to the new playing conditions, five fielders will now be allowed to field outside the 30-yard circle in the final 10 overs of the innings. So teams will essentially be allowed a maximum of two fielders outside the circle between overs one and ten while overs 11 to 40 would allow the stationing of four fielders outside the circle.
So for overs --

1 - 10 = Max 2 fielders outside circle
11 - 40 = Max 4 fielders outside circle
41- 50 = Max 5 fielders outside circle

http://www.cricbuzz.com/cricket-news...erplay-in-odis
__________________
Bangladesh
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 26, 2015, 01:50 PM
mufi_02's Avatar
mufi_02 mufi_02 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: August 2, 2011
Location: NY
Favorite Player: Lara, Shakib
Posts: 5,417

These are some big changes. No batting powerplay AND 5 fields outside circle (over 41-50). We need to adjust and come up with a strategy against SA.

300 just might be a tough score again.
__________________
Bangladesh
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 26, 2015, 02:13 PM
icricket's Avatar
icricket icricket is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: February 26, 2015
Favorite Player: BD players, Starc, Waqar
Posts: 498

Something for the bowler. I welcome the change.
__________________
It always seems impossible until it's done
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 26, 2015, 02:23 PM
Dilscoop Dilscoop is offline
Cricket Guru
Commissioner, MLC
 
Join Date: March 22, 2010
Posts: 11,968

I liked it when the batting PP was moved to 35th over. Now it's back to 40-50? Batsmen go for it anyways in the last ten, so what's the point? It seems like they keep moving back and forth between the two extremes. Come to a middle ground!
BatPP was just fine, just needed to increase the fielders on the boundaries.

I don't agree with free hits in every mistakes a bowler makes! Would you take away runs every time a batsman mishits and plays and ugly shot?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 26, 2015, 03:35 PM
WarWolf WarWolf is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: March 3, 2007
Favorite Player: Love them all....
Posts: 12,768

Now singles and doubles will be even more important to score runs.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 26, 2015, 03:44 PM
Nadim's Avatar
Nadim Nadim is offline
BanglaCricket Staff
 
Join Date: September 16, 2008
Location: Guantanamo
Favorite Player: Innocent Bird
Posts: 44,309

I like it. No batting pp and 5 fielders outside 30 yrds circle. 300+ would be hard to score with these rules and spinners will be bit more useful
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 26, 2015, 03:52 PM
Modad Modad is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: October 10, 2010
Posts: 158

All good but free hit on all no balls? WTF. You don't see bowlers attempting to bowl yorkers much nowadays, because of this new rule yorker will be even more rear now
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old June 26, 2015, 03:53 PM
Dilscoop Dilscoop is offline
Cricket Guru
Commissioner, MLC
 
Join Date: March 22, 2010
Posts: 11,968

What the hell you guys talking about no batting pp. It says no batting PP in 15-40. That means they can take batting pp in 41-50.

We saw too many 400 scores, too many double centuries. Now teams will struggle to score 250.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old June 26, 2015, 04:33 PM
weekyd weekyd is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: February 22, 2014
Posts: 525

Doesn't this mean that between overs 41-50 batsmen will score more runs? 350 is the new 250?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old June 26, 2015, 04:38 PM
Cricket4All Cricket4All is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: November 18, 2014
Posts: 318

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilscoop
What the hell you guys talking about no batting pp. It says no batting PP in 15-40. That means they can take batting pp in 41-50.

We saw too many 400 scores, too many double centuries. Now teams will struggle to score 250.
Batting PP is discarded altogether. There will be no such thing as batting PP.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old June 26, 2015, 04:46 PM
al-Sagar's Avatar
al-Sagar al-Sagar is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: December 23, 2007
Location: The Quiet Place
Favorite Player: Curtly Ambrose
Posts: 23,984

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilscoop
What the hell you guys talking about no batting pp. It says no batting PP in 15-40. That means they can take batting pp in 41-50.

We saw too many 400 scores, too many double centuries. Now teams will struggle to score 250.
Earlier the rule said batting PP, between 15-40. And no PP after 40.

Now the first line has changed.

So it's noPP.

Only first 10 overs are eventually PP with two fielder's outside.
__________________
The OffStump
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old June 26, 2015, 04:47 PM
Spitfire_x86's Avatar
Spitfire_x86 Spitfire_x86 is offline
Cricket Legend
Fantasy Winner: BD v NZ 2008
 
Join Date: December 17, 2004
Location: Dhaka
Posts: 7,657

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilscoop
What the hell you guys talking about no batting pp. It says no batting PP in 15-40. That means they can take batting pp in 41-50.

We saw too many 400 scores, too many double centuries. Now teams will struggle to score 250.
Batsmen playing more aggressively throughout the innings has been the main reason behind scoring rate surge in recent years. Batting PP had marginal effect on overall scoring rate, so getting rid of it isn't going to make much of a difference. 5 fielders outside the circle won't affect teams with clean hitters down the order, so I expect things to remain same more or less the same.
__________________
sig?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old June 26, 2015, 04:57 PM
ahnaf's Avatar
ahnaf ahnaf is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 31, 2010
Location: Dhaka,BD
Favorite Player: Tamim,Ash,Mash,Shakib
Posts: 4,245

Now change the mandatory two new ball rule. Make it optional
__________________
আমার অপার সীমানাতে তোমার চিহ্ন তবু রবে বেঁচে ...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old June 26, 2015, 05:14 PM
al Furqaan's Avatar
al Furqaan al Furqaan is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 21,984

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spitfire_x86
Batsmen playing more aggressively throughout the innings has been the main reason behind scoring rate surge in recent years. Batting PP had marginal effect on overall scoring rate, so getting rid of it isn't going to make much of a difference. 5 fielders outside the circle won't affect teams with clean hitters down the order, so I expect things to remain same more or less the same.
Still gives more support to bowlers.
__________________
Verbally terrorizing BD-haters since 2004
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old June 26, 2015, 05:23 PM
rinathq's Avatar
rinathq rinathq is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 1, 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Favorite Player: Mash, Shak, Enam, Riyad
Posts: 3,551

The return of Mash the death over bowler
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old June 26, 2015, 05:35 PM
Dilscoop Dilscoop is offline
Cricket Guru
Commissioner, MLC
 
Join Date: March 22, 2010
Posts: 11,968

I'm so confused!! If there's no PP, why doesn't it just say there is no PP? Why does it say, "No batting Powerplay between overs 15-40 (ODIs)"? That only makes it seem like there's batting PP from 41-50 over?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old June 26, 2015, 05:41 PM
Mas_UK25 Mas_UK25 is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: February 15, 2015
Location: London, England, UK
Favorite Player: Mash, Mushy, Tamim, Abul
Posts: 1,073

I like most things. But more free hits on cards seems unnecessary.
I'd gone with 5 outside from 11-50 overs.
If they are going to go with this way, and have 5 outside after 40th over - 50th. I'd gone with 3 outside first 10 instead of 2. 4 outside 11th - 40th. Because, now teams will look to attack first 10 a lot more.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old June 26, 2015, 11:51 PM
Saifulsohel Saifulsohel is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: October 21, 2011
Location: Dhaka,Bd
Favorite Player: Shakib,Tamim,Anamul
Posts: 1,359

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilscoop
I'm so confused!! If there's no PP, why doesn't it just say there is no PP? Why does it say, "No batting Powerplay between overs 15-40 (ODIs)"? That only makes it seem like there's batting PP from 41-50 over?
1st 10 over is PP with two fielders outside 30 yards.
__________________
A cricket-lover engineer
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old June 27, 2015, 01:28 AM
Rifat's Avatar
Rifat Rifat is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: March 30, 2007
Location: Connecticut
Favorite Player: Hashim Amla
Posts: 11,643

Arafat Sunny says hi
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old June 27, 2015, 05:10 AM
Zeeshan's Avatar
Zeeshan Zeeshan is offline
BC Staff
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: March 9, 2008
Posts: 27,518

Rifat er ajkal uttom kumar uttom kumar bhaab...
__________________
You are...fired!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old June 27, 2015, 05:36 AM
WarWolf WarWolf is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: March 3, 2007
Favorite Player: Love them all....
Posts: 12,768

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeeshan
Rifat er ajkal uttom kumar uttom kumar bhaab...
As far as I know, Rifat is a good (uttom) boy and also bachelor (kumar). So definitely he is uttom kumar.
__________________
And Allah Knows the best
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old June 27, 2015, 05:12 PM
al-Sagar's Avatar
al-Sagar al-Sagar is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: December 23, 2007
Location: The Quiet Place
Favorite Player: Curtly Ambrose
Posts: 23,984

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarWolf
As far as I know, Rifat is a good (uttom) boy and also bachelor (kumar). So definitely he is uttom kumar.
Oh ... . Amio ek somoy uttom Kumar chilam
__________________
The OffStump
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old June 27, 2015, 09:44 PM
Habib's Avatar
Habib Habib is online now
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 30, 2007
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Favorite Player: A few
Posts: 8,268

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarWolf
As far as I know, Rifat is a good (uttom) boy and also bachelor (kumar). So definitely he is uttom kumar.
Haha gold.

On topic- I welcome the change, but need to see it in action before giving final verdict.
__________________
Nevermind
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old Yesterday, 10:08 AM
M.H.Rubel M.H.Rubel is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: August 18, 2009
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: All Bangladeshi players
Posts: 6,037

I never liked the batting power play. New rules will give something to the bowlers. How many of you like it? It seems ODI will get the red ball 80s flavour back ?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old Yesterday, 12:30 PM
BD_TigerZ's Avatar
BD_TigerZ BD_TigerZ is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: July 26, 2012
Posts: 5,562

These changes are really good for us .

-The fact we can limit the damage now as we suck chasing massive scores and are out of the game basically after 320.
-We've always sucked at batting PPs.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket