facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:23 PM
M.H.Rubel M.H.Rubel is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: August 18, 2009
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: All Bangladeshi players
Posts: 5,691

Quote:
Originally Posted by asddsa
DITTO !
What is the meaning of DITTO?

Posted via BC Mobile Edition
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:25 PM
revolver revolver is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 13, 2009
Posts: 5,343

Quote:
Originally Posted by cric_mady
thik bolcen bhaia..but what to do?no better replacement.though I thought bull over Zunaid = gobor
yhh...i think a smasher like TIK, will be a wicked for our opening slots
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:26 PM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 15,874

Trust me, Naeem and Riyad will not be much worst bowler than out top 4 bolwers. Most likely one of the top four bowlers will take the hnnor of being the most expensive bowlers in this game.

Nayeem and Riyad is fine as bowlers for this kind of format. Somtimes we worry too much in in wrong places.

T20 is all about batting. Can our top 4 batsman deliver what is needed to be competative? thats where we need to worry.
__________________
Stop that “chudurbudur”
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:32 PM
reyme's Avatar
reyme reyme is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 4,026

Quote:
Originally Posted by offstump
bd will be allout for 125, rakibul will top score with 25 of 45 balls, everybody will say if he wasn't playing, BD would have been booked for 90 runs. he steadied the ship and let BD reach a respectable total.
In reality this sort of things happened several times...there was a time we got bundled out under 13 overs.
__________________
Golf is good, no umpire needed!
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:34 PM
reyme's Avatar
reyme reyme is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 4,026

This is a horrible team selection. It tells me the coach and managemnt are novice when it come to basic game strategy. How many time we saw pacers were giving away huge runs and finally the spinners were brought in to slow down the run rate? It happens all the time and in forms of cricket againt the likes of AUS, NZ in their homeground.

Last edited by reyme; February 2, 2010 at 01:39 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:35 PM
reyme's Avatar
reyme reyme is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 4,026

Prediction: If NZ bats first they will score 200 and if they bat second I see the game is over around 16 overs.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:38 PM
reyme's Avatar
reyme reyme is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 4,026

There is no point palying 3 pacers against NZ at hamilton! The pacers will get slaughtered. First 3 overs: 45 runs...spinners will be brought in to slow down the rate....but towards the end it will be the pacers again to open the floodgate and Kiwis are home losing 2-3 wickets or scroring 200 runs easily.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:43 PM
Dhakablues's Avatar
Dhakablues Dhakablues is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: December 25, 2004
Location: EverGreen State, USA
Favorite Player: Mashrafee
Posts: 4,263

I am glad that the selectors are giving ample opportunities to some players like Raqibul. That rarely happens unless your name is Ashraful. I guess he is there to the lone guy to hold the fort, if he can for 1 over. Recently he doesnt last more than few balls. But other than that, I think this should be the ODI squad as well.. I mean who is the T20 expert here other than Aftab? Alok wouldve been another good contestant for T20 with his bowling skills but he is not in form now as it appear. Nevertheless, it appears that the Captain, Coach are all hyped up and going for the win. Against India, they were asking for a good play, this time they are expecting series wins!!! what a change. Even Cricinfo attests such notion... Lets see if they can back it up with work.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:46 PM
reyme's Avatar
reyme reyme is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 4,026

NZ cant play spin well, and lack of pace can do the magic!

My T20 Team would have been:
1. Tamim
2. Junaed
3. Aftab
4. Ash
5. Shakib
6. Riyad
7. Mushfiq
8. Nayeem
9. Razzak
10. Enamul Haq Jr. (Saqlain Shajib)<--Specialist Spinner
11. Rasel (Nazmul)

Last edited by reyme; February 2, 2010 at 01:58 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:47 PM
bd fan's Avatar
bd fan bd fan is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 31, 2009
Location: london
Favorite Player: shakib and tamim
Posts: 651

all of our fast bowlers are gonna get smashed we need someone like syed rasel who can controll his pace and actually bowl towards the wicket
Reply With Quote
  #61  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:48 PM
BD-Shardul BD-Shardul is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: October 16, 2006
Location: Doha, Qatar
Favorite Player: Mash,Shakib,Tamim
Posts: 7,046

BTW, any news if Ash will play natural game or take the cautious approach like ODIs?

And I think we should bowl first after if we win the toss.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:50 PM
reyme's Avatar
reyme reyme is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 4,026

I agree with all the posters about ROK, playing Raqibul is a losing mentality, you have given up. There is no "grafter" concept in T20. Slogging starts from Ball 1. Of course if you are afraid of losing wickets play 11 bowlers they will take us home not losing too many wickets anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:52 PM
bd fan's Avatar
bd fan bd fan is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 31, 2009
Location: london
Favorite Player: shakib and tamim
Posts: 651

i think junaid should have been chosen to partner tamim
i remember in t20 world cup last year the match against india junaid smashed something like 44 runs from 23 balls if it wasn't for him bangladesh would have made 15 runs less off the total
I also remember the thought about winning during the 13th 14th over when bangladesh needed a run rate of like 7. The thought perished when roqibul came into bat
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:56 PM
reyme's Avatar
reyme reyme is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 4,026

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fazal
Trust me, T20 is all about batting. Can our top 4 batsman deliver what is needed to be competative? thats where we need to worry.
No, I dont trust you! T20 is also about selecting the right group of bowlers. Our strength is spin and NZ weakness is also spin. I dont see any harm going with ALL-SPIN attack in that batting paradise.

Jamie has a smooth HEAD but he is not a HEAD coach material.
__________________
Golf is good, no umpire needed!
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old February 2, 2010, 01:59 PM
reyme's Avatar
reyme reyme is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 4,026

Oh well, 10 straight loss in T20 then....
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old February 2, 2010, 02:01 PM
cricman's Avatar
cricman cricman is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 8, 2005
Location: Deleting Evidence
Favorite Player: Dubya
Posts: 9,439

Whoa!

All it's missing is Raqibul for Raj

This is gonna be like BD vs SA in the ICCWT20 a few years ago ... Run Rate of 15 in the 1st 5 overs.

Bangladesh have taken the Pakistan route in T20, it's good to see. Hopefully this is the squad that will bring glory in the WI!

75/4
__________________
12.6 Syed Rasel to Sangakkara, OUT: What a delivery, completely fooled Sangakkara, first five delivery were the outswingers and now, this one comes in sharply, Sangakkara tries to left it and ball hits the off stump, top class bowling!
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old February 2, 2010, 02:01 PM
wiseshah wiseshah is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: June 18, 2005
Location: newyork
Favorite Player: Ryder,Tamim,shakib,warner
Posts: 6,135

our selector loves to give surprises, thats nothing new

they try to convert test player into 20/20 and 20/20 player into test

they did it before and they are doing it again
before we have seen javed omar belim, mehrab jr in 20/20
now rokibul and shahadat there, mashallah--they prepared for another disaster.

Imrul kayes is the highest run maker in 20/20 DPL, why dropping him? if not kayes, they should select junaed

razzaq should have been there instead of shahadat

line up should have been

tamim
kayes
aftab
ashraful
sakib
mahmudullah
naeem
mushfiq
razzaq
shafiul
najmul
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old February 2, 2010, 02:02 PM
wiseshah wiseshah is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: June 18, 2005
Location: newyork
Favorite Player: Ryder,Tamim,shakib,warner
Posts: 6,135

i think i said that in previous line up thread, to make a disaster they should have rokibul and shahadat in 20/20--probably they listened to me and try to prove me wrong
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old February 2, 2010, 02:03 PM
cricman's Avatar
cricman cricman is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 8, 2005
Location: Deleting Evidence
Favorite Player: Dubya
Posts: 9,439

I like this the Line up

Kayes can't hook or pull he's useless ala Nazimuddin

Only Problem I have is the Inclusion of Rock over Raj,

Maybe in the WI we can have Mashrafe and Farhad in for Rubel and Rock
__________________
12.6 Syed Rasel to Sangakkara, OUT: What a delivery, completely fooled Sangakkara, first five delivery were the outswingers and now, this one comes in sharply, Sangakkara tries to left it and ball hits the off stump, top class bowling!
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old February 2, 2010, 02:10 PM
kalpurush's Avatar
kalpurush kalpurush is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: June 7, 2005
Location: Victoria: Heaven's Earth!
Posts: 17,180

Quote:
Originally Posted by wiseshah
i think i said that in previous line up thread, to make a disaster they should have rokibul and shahadat in 20/20--probably they listened to me and try to prove me wrong
I hope "they" prove you wrong bro.
__________________
> Start slow. Build a base. Then explode.
> I needed to perform so that I could give my countrymen an occasion to cherish and be proud of - Ice Man
> My photographs @ flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/obayedh/
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old February 2, 2010, 02:11 PM
kalpurush's Avatar
kalpurush kalpurush is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: June 7, 2005
Location: Victoria: Heaven's Earth!
Posts: 17,180

Quote:
Originally Posted by cricman
I like this the Line up

Kayes can't hook or pull he's useless ala Nazimuddin

Only Problem I have is the Inclusion of Rock over Raj,

Maybe in the WI we can have Mashrafe and Farhad in for Rubel and Rock
Shouldn't be it Alok?! after all its T20!!
__________________
> Start slow. Build a base. Then explode.
> I needed to perform so that I could give my countrymen an occasion to cherish and be proud of - Ice Man
> My photographs @ flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/obayedh/
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old February 2, 2010, 02:14 PM
Equinox Equinox is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 25, 2009
Posts: 7,846

Squad for WT20 should be:
Tamim Iqbal
Mohammad Ashraful
Aftab Ahmed
Alok Kapali
Mahmudullah
Shakib Al Hasan
Mushfiqur Rahim+
Naeem Islam
Mashrafe Mortaza*
Abdur Razzak
Nazmul Hossain

Zunaed Siddique, Anamul Haque, Syed Rasel, Shafiul Islam
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old February 2, 2010, 02:21 PM
reyme's Avatar
reyme reyme is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 4,026

Shafiul will not last more than 2 overs leaking 30+ runs. Same goes for Shahadat.
I sense a 13 ball 50 from McCullum...
This is mindless team selection.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old February 2, 2010, 02:33 PM
Kana-Baba's Avatar
Kana-Baba Kana-Baba is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 26, 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Favorite Player: Nannu, Ash, Mash
Posts: 908

I would take

Zunayed or Kapali instead of Rok and

Rajjak instead of Shahadat.

Apart from that it's a good team!
__________________
পুরান পাগল ভাত পায় না, আবার নতুন পাগলের আমদানি... সুখ নাই ৱে পাগল!
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old February 2, 2010, 02:35 PM
AsifTheManRahman's Avatar
AsifTheManRahman AsifTheManRahman is offline
Super Moderator
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,675

Razzak should play. He can hit too.

Imrul > Raqib in T20s and should open with Tamim, with Aftab and Ashraful coming in later on.

Oh well.
__________________
Screw the IPL, I'm going to the MLC!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket