what do you think guyz? Should Nazmul play against WI? he seems to be a favorite of Ian Pont as well...
__________________
One Sheikh Mujib, one Dr. Yunus, one Nogorbaul James, one Salman Shah, One Maqsoodul Haque, one Shakib-Al-Hasan, One Nazmul Hossain the best bowler and One Bangladesh...
Quoting our dear offstump bhai from Fast Bowler Expectations thread. Some food for thought:
Quote:
Originally Posted by offstump
when Nazmul started his career i really liked him. he, to me was a slower version of javagal srinath.
nazmul used to bowl wide from the crease pitching the ball on a very good length and some in swing. the ball pitched outside off and with angle and swing was always heading towards the off stump. but occasionaly he was able to apply outswing and that puzzled the batsmen.
his problem to me was he was too consistent with line and length and very little variation of pace at that stage of his career. so once batsman got used to his length and pace used to come down the wicket and play his deliveries on the ball. nazmul could not cope with that and with no plan B used to struggle.
later i saw him lose his ability to swing the ball that much though he now has developed the skills of varying pace. also some injuries have harmed his development.
i know the BD fans now expect shafiul and rubel to do good because the have more pace and talent than any other BD bowler ever but i feel nazmul can also be a very good bowler with some proper guidance and chance.
I don't think we should break the combination unless we have a McGrath in our bench. Both Rubel and Shaf have swing and pace; even if the pitch is on the slower side, at least they can reverse swing and put the W. Indian lefties in losing their middle or leg stump. We do have to remember that our SLAs may not be effective against the 4-5 lefties that WI have in their line up.
__________________
In Darwin's eyes, Bangladeshi batsmen are still monkeys with cricket bats.
This recording was long time ago. Nonetheless, it would be wise to pick Nazmul over Rubel. Nazmul is bit slower but accurate in line and length, also economical in first 5/6 overs. It will not be bad idea to give him a chance during regulation pp.
Originally Posted by ahms
This recording was long time ago. Nonetheless, it would be wise to pick Nazmul over Rubel. Nazmul is bit slower but accurate in line and length, also economical in first 5/6 overs. It will not be bad idea to give him a chance during regulation pp.
Don't see any scope to bench Shafi or Rubel. Only player that's expandable to accommodate Nazmul in the team is Razzak (his left arm slow bowling is unlikely to make much impact against Windies), but that will be a huge gamble and don't see our management going that far.