Originally Posted by rinathq
Why? If Mushy is the best batsman... why wouldnt u have him at 3? Mushy-Riyad-Shak makes more sense than a rookie-mushy-shak-riyad
This would be ideal however
a) Mushi is not ready for number 3
b) His record is not impressive at 3
c) Team BD doesn't want him to loose early in the innings as he is more effective when new bowl gets bit old
d) currently we can't afford to do this experiment
definitely food for thought.
I want him to play number 4 @ WC , there is no alternative option.