facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 7, 2011, 06:57 AM
Direct-Hit's Avatar
Direct-Hit Direct-Hit is offline
Former National Specialist Coach
 
Join Date: January 29, 2011
Posts: 156
Lightbulb Politics & Cricket

Here is an interesting article for all Bangladesh Cricket fans, as it covers one of the main topics for discussion on the forum:

http://www.espncricinfo.com/pakistan...ry/518030.html

Pakistan eyes legal action over ICC rule change

The PCB and ICC could be on a collision course again in a high-stakes case that potentially involves Pakistan's suspension from cricket's governing body. The Pakistan board has sent a legal notice to the ICC raising questions - and threatening legal action - about a proposed amendment to the ICC's constitution, which would allow the governing body to suspend a member in case of government interference in the running of a national cricket board.

Ironically the amendment - which also requires that a member board's executive body include elected officials - is said by some accounts to have been proposed at an ICC executive board meeting in February by the PCB chairman Ijaz Butt himself. What is clear is that he didn't object to the matter at the time.

The PCB is one of the boards directly affected by the amendment. Its constitution states that the President of the country - invariably but not always a political figure - is the Patron of the board and the sole authority in hiring or firing the chairman. Nor are elections of any kind held. A number of members of the governing board - the executive body - are appointed by the chairman and all must be approved by the President. This, the PCB argues in its legal notice, could result in its suspension, even permanent expulsion, for the changes are tantamount to asking the board to throw the Patron out of the constitution.

It's not the PCB alone that could be affected by the amendment. Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) is an interim body whose major decisions go through the ministry, which also has the power to disband the board entirely. In Bangladesh, interference isn't as clear and distinct, though all board presidents are government-appointed. Thus any given BCB administration reflects the prevailing political winds of the day. The current president Mustafa Kamal, for example, is a sitting member of parliament. The BCCI would also come on the radar. Though its officials are elected, there is a clear and strong presence of senior Indian politicians at its highest levels.

The proposed changes have been on the ICC's agenda since the February meeting. At its subsequent board meeting in Mumbai, immediately after the World Cup final, the ICC board decided the changes would be officially proposed at the annual conference in July in Hong Kong, and be made applicable by July 2012.

The press release of that meeting stated the changes will be "designed to prevent undue interference by governments in the administration of cricket in Member countries, including but not limited to interference in operational matters, the selection and management of teams, the appointment of coaches or support personnel or the activities of a Member."

Despite the quite vast implications for governance of the game around the world from such a proposal, the release drew little comment. But in a series of articles for the Pakistan daily Daily Times at the start of May, eminent columnist Zakir Hussain Syed - also a former administrator - first revealed the PCB's reaction and contents of the legal notice, sent after the April 4 meeting, and confirmed by ESPNcricinfo to be accurate.

The legal notice was prepared by Mark Gay, a sports law specialist with DLA Piper who has worked with the PCB on several matters in the past, and refers to the legal framework of the country where the ICC is registered: the British Virgin Islands (B VI).

"The insertion of these provisions at this time, into the ICC constitution, in the circumstances, in which the PCB operates," the notice reads, "would constitute unfair prejudice for the purpose of section 184(1) of the B VI of the Business Companies Act 2004 (the B VI Act). As such unless the ICC agree to drop its proposal to pass such amendments to the Articles of Associations at its Annual General Meeting in July, our client will have no alternative but to commence legal proceedings against it to restrain this conduct, which we consider unfairly prejudicial to our client in its capacity as shareholder of the ICC."

The relevant law refers to members of a company being able to apply to the court for an order if they consider certain actions of the company have been, or are likely to be, discriminatory or prejudicial. The PCB argues the amendment is prejudicial because it affects only some members, "i.e. those member boards that are currently elected will not be affected," the notice says. Also, the PCB says it has "nothing whatsoever to do with the objects of the company, which are promotion of…cricket. It is a nakedly political measure."

In the April 4 meeting, PCB officials also pointed out that upon giving membership to Pakistan, the ICC was aware of the nature of the board and the relationship with the government of the day. A far more complex and awkward line of argument was also raised when officials asked how 'government interference' was to be defined. Would it include, an official asked as an example, a government deciding whether or not a team tours a country, as has happened recently with Zimbabwe and Pakistan? It has also been pointed out that holding even domestic tournaments in Pakistan often requires assistance from the provincial or federal government to provide security. The ICC says that there will be strict definitions of interference, to do with appointments in the board and its administration only.

The situation is further complicated by Butt's role in placing the issue on the agenda. It is believed that the topic was not officially on the agenda in February and was only included at the last minute, the night before the meeting when notes were passed into the hotel rooms of board members.

The matter has been informally on the cards for nearly a year as the ICC is keen to bring cricket in line with other prominent sports bodies such as FIFA and the IOC, though it was first broached officially only in that February meeting. The next day, as is protocol, a board director had to volunteer to put the amendment on the table and it was alleged later that Butt proposed it, obviously raising no objection at the time.

However, in between that and the next meeting, Pakistan belatedly realised the implications of the amendments and lobbied Sri Lanka and Bangladesh to rustle up support. They even sent them a copy of the legal notice and were, according to observers familiar with the developments, assured of support. Yet at the April 4 meeting, both boards withdrew support and voted for the amendments, leaving the PCB as the sole objector from among the Full Members.

It was at the April meeting that other board members are said to have told PCB representatives that they were objecting to a proposal officially put forth by their own (PCB) chairman. Pakistan have asked ICC officials to check the minutes of the meeting to see if this is indeed the case, but have not yet been given a response. Pakistan had taken along their legal advisor Taffazul Rizvi to the meeting to explain to the board the difficulties involved in making the proposed changes in Pakistan. He was not allowed to speak, however, by the ICC board.

Since then, there has been what one involved official said were "fruitful discussions" between the PCB and ICC on the matter. The ICC is said to be aware of the difficulties involved in the PCB asking the President to end his own involvement in cricket, and there have been discussions about extending the window of time during which they expect the changes, as the ICC understands it to be a long-term process. The ICC is said even to be willing to come to Pakistan to discuss the matter with the relevant authorities. Contrary to the ICC's optimism that it won't come to it, ESPNcricinfo understands that the PCB's reluctance will compel it still to pursue legal action if needed, even if that will be what the official said would be "contrary to the spirit of discussions."

The developments are likely to raise questions once again not only about how equipped Butt is to handle such matters at board meetings, but also the growing isolation of Pakistan. The board believes they are being victimised, alluding to as much in the legal notice, believing the amendments to be "provoked by a desire to damage the PCB or out of a desire for revenge."

This is the fall-out, the PCB says, from John Howard's non-appointment in June 2010. At the time Pakistan was one of the members supporting Howard's nomination but eventually they reversed. "We are instructed that the Australian Cricket Board put forward as their nominee of the ICC ... John Howard. It is the view of many in Pakistan that he has promoted racial policies," the legal notice says. "As such, the PCB among others, expressed its concern about his status as presidential candidate. When his candidature was withdrawn, in the view of PCB, this measure was born. If this is true, and full disclosure should reveal this, it is the product not of a desire to advance the objects of ICC, or to promote cricket, but out of the desire to disadvantage the PCB."

Over the course of this administration, since October 2008, the PCB has steadily lost allies in the ICC. Relations with the BCCI remain enmeshed in political developments. The rest of the Asian bloc is not the guarantee of support it once was, as the withdrawal of support from Sri Lanka and Bangladesh on this issue also made clear. The ECB, at best, remains cool after the fracas last summer when Butt clumsily accused the England team of match-fixing, only to apologise subsequently. Cricket Australia were not happy after the Howard rebuff and now, after the thinly veiled accusations of the legal notice, their attitude is not likely to soften.

Osman Samiuddin is Pakistan editor of ESPNcricinfo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 7, 2011, 07:11 AM
mm517 mm517 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: June 6, 2011
Posts: 31

Well, We know how pakistan have been caught on many occasion on spot fixing etc for example mohammed amir and etc... but it is difficult to find something about our national team and the management on any sort of misleading things which they are doing. But in respect to this many BC members agree and have the same opinion that something internally is wrong in Bangladesh cricket.... and 25 years says the story.. Unless someone exploit those.. then we dont know how long it will take for bangladesh to be a competiting team. Jamie did try to exploit it and everyone knows what happend to him..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 7, 2011, 07:19 AM
Rabz's Avatar
Rabz Rabz is offline
BanglaCricket Staff
BC - Bangladesh Representative
 
Join Date: February 28, 2005
Location: Here
Favorite Player: Father of BD Cricket
Posts: 20,480

Quote:
It was at the April meeting that other board members are said to have told PCB representatives that they were objecting to a proposal officially put forth by their own (PCB) chairman.
Oh You, Butt !!

__________________
Verily, in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find rest [Al-Qur'an,13:28]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 7, 2011, 07:33 AM
riankhan's Avatar
riankhan riankhan is offline
BanglaCricket BPL Fantasy League Winner 2012
 
Join Date: January 9, 2008
Favorite Player: To Bash = AshDaFool
Posts: 2,040

Actually, what happened to Jamie? His contract was finished, and now we are looking for a new coach. He contributed a lot in his four years period, and locals are overall happy with him. Now its time for a change.

I am proud that BD voted for the amendment. Barring the Board President's chair, all BCB's structures are democratic.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 7, 2011, 09:34 AM
Ace of BD's Avatar
Ace of BD Ace of BD is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 3, 2011
Favorite Player: The Champion
Posts: 793

Quote:
Originally Posted by mm517
Well, We know how pakistan have been caught on many occasion on spot fixing etc for example mohammed amir and etc... but it is difficult to find something about our national team and the management on any sort of misleading things which they are doing. But in respect to this many BC members agree and have the same opinion that something internally is wrong in Bangladesh cricket.... and 25 years says the story.. Unless someone exploit those.. then we dont know how long it will take for bangladesh to be a competiting team. Jamie did try to exploit it and everyone knows what happend to him..
yeah man, agree with u, we can't beat uae, a team filled with expats who play cricket only once two weeks..we have been playing for 10 yrs....we have achieved nothing.....and in the next ten yrs, we will loose to timbuktu too!!!
__________________
"There is no place for second best" - Ace of BD
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 7, 2011, 11:01 AM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 15,834

Will the proposed rule (change) help removing politics from ICC ?
Thats where all the politic is played. If ICC wants to clean up, that's where they should concentrate first.

Now a days ICC plays like a backboneless organization, they use their sticks against less influencial boards and run away like a sissy from any kind of confrontration against stronger boards. When BCCI ask ICC to jump, ICC "how high?" without asking "why".
__________________
Stop that “chudurbudur”
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 7, 2011, 01:10 PM
Avik's Avatar
Avik Avik is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: September 15, 2008
Location: Piscataway, NJ, USA
Favorite Player: Shakib, Tamim
Posts: 743

this is a good step. remember this same thing happened to BFF? now ICC gives so much money to its members that it can do that. and I think Pakistan will back off if it wants ICC's money. this will be great. this will give proper cricket organizers to get elected, and we can get rid of goons like Kamal.
__________________
It is good to let Shakib off captaincy, it will relieve some pressure. He will be offered captaincy again in a few years when he will be more than ready, Bangladesh will voyage into a new horizon then
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old June 7, 2011, 01:14 PM
Jadukor's Avatar
Jadukor Jadukor is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: October 17, 2010
Location: Bangkok
Favorite Player: Shakib, Brian Lara
Posts: 7,123

well this will only happen if BCCI doesn't have any problem with it...
__________________
Char Chokka Hoi Hoi... Orange Juice Pamu Koi?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old June 7, 2011, 01:41 PM
auntu's Avatar
auntu auntu is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: March 7, 2007
Location: elsewhere
Favorite Player: ZAR
Posts: 9,861

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jadukor
well this will only happen if BCCI doesn't have any problem with it...
I think this is the bottom line.
__________________
﴾اَلَاۤ اِنَّ اَوۡلِيَآءَ اللّٰهِ لَا خَوۡفٌ عَلَيۡهِمۡ وَلَا هُمۡ يَحۡزَنُوۡنَ ۖ ۚ‏ ﴿۶۲
"Listen, the friends of Allah shall have no fear, nor shall they grieve" (Yunus: 62)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old June 8, 2011, 04:29 AM
lamisa's Avatar
lamisa lamisa is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: December 18, 2007
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: tamim,shafiul,mushy
Posts: 6,743

does that mean no loitta?
__________________
haruk ba jituk,i am always there with BDcricket!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old June 8, 2011, 04:55 AM
Direct-Hit's Avatar
Direct-Hit Direct-Hit is offline
Former National Specialist Coach
 
Join Date: January 29, 2011
Posts: 156

Unfortunately where an organisation is run, and decisions made, by people who are not sufficiently qualified, knowledgeable or experienced to do so (especially when heavily influenced by outside forces, who also do not have experience, qualifications or knowledge and have ulterior agendas) then I am afraid, it is the blind leading the blind.

Cricket, by its very nature is a long term industry and needs handling in that way. Short term fixes i.e. 6-12 months can address very small localised problems, but mot sporting organisations will plan for 1 yr, 2 yr, 3 yr, 5 yr and longer; setting goals to be achieved at each marker. If the governing body only ever addresses a few months ahead (for whatever reason be it political, financial, other) then the same problems will crop up and the bigger issues will always come back around. I think Ian has also mentioned this on a number of occasions in various posts, but I am afraid this is reality. The ironic thing is that most other countries (except India) face the challenge of making cricket popular to the general public and justify it as something to invest in long term. Bangladesh is, in my experience, one of the most fanatical cricket loving countries in the world, so doesnt face this problem. The only problem is creating a national team worthy of the support they receive from the fans.

Where cricket is used, and abused for "other" purposes, the game itself will never really fulfil its potential. Address the bigger problems, create a solid domestic structure, change the culture of players from am amateur approach to a professional approach (professional is a mindset, not simply receiving cash to play cricket) and you will have something solid to fall back on when times are hard. Passion for cricket is not something to be taken lightly, either as a player and administrator or a fan.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old June 8, 2011, 04:55 AM
Jadukor's Avatar
Jadukor Jadukor is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: October 17, 2010
Location: Bangkok
Favorite Player: Shakib, Brian Lara
Posts: 7,123

two words come to mind: fake election
__________________
Char Chokka Hoi Hoi... Orange Juice Pamu Koi?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old June 8, 2011, 07:06 AM
Avik's Avatar
Avik Avik is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: September 15, 2008
Location: Piscataway, NJ, USA
Favorite Player: Shakib, Tamim
Posts: 743

that will happen. after BFF adapted the election policy, the first election was through a deal with the opposition. the old elected committee resigned, and the new (govt approved) committee won through a fake election.

at least, down the road, fair elections will come.
__________________
It is good to let Shakib off captaincy, it will relieve some pressure. He will be offered captaincy again in a few years when he will be more than ready, Bangladesh will voyage into a new horizon then
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old June 8, 2011, 10:13 AM
Banglaguy Banglaguy is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Location: London
Favorite Player: Ryan Ten Doescate
Posts: 4,861

If BBCI say no more president, then it's going to happen. If not, then it's up to the ICC. BCCI>>>>>ICC
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket