| |
Bangladesh Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss Bangladesh Cricket
|

December 21, 2011, 11:20 AM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: April 12, 2007
Location: Dhaka / NYC Metro Area
Favorite Player: Shakib, Nasir, Sir Don
Posts: 7,704
|
|
Three pacers?
If you are a good team, three pacers tend to be the standard. But, as we showed in this match, our pace bowling needs to improve a lot before we can routinely go with something like this again, especially if the pitch is not pace friendly. If Bangladesh lasted another 30 minutes between the two innings, there would not have been enough time for PAK to win the match. If we had an extra batsman and went with two pacers, perhaps the 2nd test ends in a draw.
__________________
প্রথম বাংলাদেশ আমার শেষ বাংলাদেশ, জীবন বাংলাদেশ আমার মরন বাংলাদেশ।
|

December 21, 2011, 11:26 AM
|
 |
BC Staff BC Bangladesh
|
|
Join Date: October 30, 2010
Location: Mirpur
Favorite Player: SAH and Gilly
Posts: 10,022
|
|
I didnt see the point of taking both sahadat and robiul..even Farhad reza would not have done any worse, And he could have given us some run
__________________
তুমি কে? আমি কে?
বাঙালী বাঙালী
|

December 21, 2011, 11:38 AM
|
 |
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: July 18, 2004
Location: New York
Favorite Player: Shakib, Tamim, Mash
Posts: 9,386
|
|
I say dont take any player for the heck of it. Robiul is a complete garbage. SK should concentrate on Dhaliwood. He has left his time behind.
Play three pacers only when Shafiul, Rubel and Nazmul are fit and the pitch is ideal for fast bowling. And I dont see Mash playing Test again 
__________________
The mind is like a parachute, it only works when open.....Thomas Dewey
|

December 21, 2011, 11:57 AM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: April 12, 2007
Location: Dhaka / NYC Metro Area
Favorite Player: Shakib, Nasir, Sir Don
Posts: 7,704
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by roman
I say dont take any player for the heck of it. Robiul is a complete garbage. SK should concentrate on Dhaliwood. He has left his time behind.
Play three pacers only when Shafiul, Rubel and Nazmul are fit and the pitch is ideal for fast bowling. And I dont see Mash playing Test again
|
Mash's health precludes playing the longer version. He should be in the team, though. He could be a player-coach.
__________________
প্রথম বাংলাদেশ আমার শেষ বাংলাদেশ, জীবন বাংলাদেশ আমার মরন বাংলাদেশ।
|

December 21, 2011, 12:23 PM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: October 21, 2011
Location: Dhaka,Bd
Favorite Player: Shakib,Tamim,Anamul
Posts: 787
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shuziburo
If you are a good team, three pacers tend to be the standard. But, as we showed in this match, our pace bowling needs to improve a lot before we can routinely go with something like this again, especially if the pitch is not pace friendly. If Bangladesh lasted another 30 minutes between the two innings, there would not have been enough time for PAK to win the match. If we had an extra batsman and went with two pacers, perhaps the 2nd test ends in a draw.
|
100% agree.I protested the moment i got team lineup.
__________________
A cricket-lover engineer
|

December 21, 2011, 12:29 PM
|
 |
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: March 19, 2011
Posts: 937
|
|
What about discards like - Syed Rasel? Sharif? Tapash?
They should be tried in Tests as well. Nazmul was discarded and look how good he has become. And, Shahadat has wayyyyyy too much time on his hands as he only plays Tests but even then he sucks?
|

December 21, 2011, 03:31 PM
|
 |
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 14,489
|
|
Nazmul performs better than his other FB teammates and then he is ignored.. and its happening for as while now. The same cannot be said about Rasel, Sharif or Taposh.
__________________
Shujoger Obhabey Chorittobaan
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 PM.
|
|