A Deconstruction on Imrul Kayes

[M.H.Rubel]

Originally Posted by BD Rox
Dude now why bring in Nazimuddin? I'm a pure hater of Nazimuddin.

Despite having lot of deficiencies still Nazimuddin is a top class longerversion player.With a good FC record.

[playmaker]

I dont understand why all this HATRED? I know he messed up big time but at the end of the day he is just a player and I think he tried what he could do but he was under a huge amount of pressure to perform.

On the other hand u could blame shahadat for his sheer arrogance and also his retarded attitude esp. in that interview

[playmaker]

Originally Posted by M.H.Rubel
Despite having lot of deficiencies still Nazimuddin is a top class longerversion player.

If Nazimuddin is top class than that means our standards are absolutely low.

Just because he scored like 140 runs in 4 innings mean nothing. If he scored 140 in each of the 4 innings or even half of it then Id take him as a top class player

[M.H.Rubel]

TESTS:Basically Kayes is not a gifted player,and he dont have thatmuch ability to play in as test opener.Neither he have good technique nor good hand eye co-ordination.So he should ne be selected in tests till his improvement.
LIMITED OVER:Currently this is the only arena where he can be tried.But he need to improve lot of things.My suggestions:
1.To improve his edgyness first he need to improve his ball selection outside off stump.
2.Lot of work needed in foot movement and timing.
All the points are going against him still he is the 2nd best opener from our lot.
I have a feeling that he will do better in #3 than #2 as the ball will be a bit older.

[BengaliPagol]

Originally Posted by playmaker
If Nazimuddin is top class than that means our standards are absolutely low.

Just because he scored like 140 runs in 4 innings mean nothing. If he scored 140 in each of the 4 innings or even half of it then Id take him as a top class player

He meant that he is a specialist test player. And thats how he should be. Nazim should stay well away from odi's and he didnt do that badly against pakistan.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Opera Mobile)

[M.H.Rubel]

Originally Posted by BengaliPagol
He meant that he is a specialist test player. And thats how he should be. Nazim should stay well away from odi's and he didnt do that badly against pakistan.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Opera Mobile)

Spot on.Thanks for the explanation

[playmaker]

Originally Posted by M.H.Rubel
Spot on.Thanks for the explanation

Originally Posted by BengaliPagol
He meant that he is a specialist test player. And thats how he should be. Nazim should stay well away from odi's and he didnt do that badly against pakistan.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Opera Mobile)

Originally Posted by M.H.Rubel
Despite having lot of deficiencies still Nazimuddin is a top class longerversion player.With a good FC record.

This explains otherwise.

A good FC record changes nothing, Nazimddin has gotten many chances and has failed considerably. Apart from that one 50 he has done nothing. Many people are acting like he is a player f the caliber of cook or something similar. IMO, guys like JS and IK and even Nafees are better than nazimudding

[RazabQ]

Sigh! KDPP ...

[Sohel]

It's interesting in a sad, S.A.D way that too many of the club/mauholla cricket matobbors running our Board and making decisions also feel the same way as quite a few of the posters here. This explains why we've never fielded a team with more than 5 capable players, let alone a full strength team with players who may have the ability to actually sustain success at the highest level of the game. That level, the last time I checked, isn't the deprioritized picnic we call the NCL. It's always irritating to hear some Indian fans whine about not fielding a "full strength side" (no Zaheer, no Bhajji, No Yuvi, whine, whine whine) AS IF WE EVER HAVE!!!

Thanks guys, keep it up. Let's continue to have weak links in the team because the team is obviously the place for the Mohammed "Exquisite Timing/ Top Class" Kohlimuddins of the world to "sort out issues" ... sigh.

Tests: 31, 78, 0, 12 ... caught, caught, LBW, bowled. Think context (pitch, condition, bowling, nature of dismissal in relation to match situation and quality of the delivery etc).

ODIs: 11, 20, 2, 1, 6, 47, 3, 30, 5, 6, 16 ... LBW, caught, caught, caught, caught, run out, caught, caught, caught, bowled, caught. Think context (pitch, condition, bowling, nature of dismissal in relation to match situation and quality of the delivery etc).

T20Is: 43 (dud-bhat match), 81 (dud-bhat match), 1, 0, 11, 0, 42 ... caught, bowled, caught, LBW, caught, LBW, caught. Think context (pitch, condition, bowling, nature of dismissal in relation to match situation and quality of the delivery etc).

What am I missing here???