So.... we can without Shakib? - Page 2

KaaL-PurusH · #26 November 30, 2012, 07:55 AM

guys hold ur excitement. this win can be one off too. lets finish the series and then we would get a idea that how good we are without our best player

technocrews · #27 November 30, 2012, 07:59 AM

o yeah we can ....

al Furqaan · #28 November 30, 2012, 08:09 AM

We also can without Tamim. But probably not without both, although Nasir is coming along nicely. Hope that Anamul and Mominul join them. With Rex and Gazi bowling as they do, and Mash being always steady if not anymore a match-winner, then we can without SAH and TIK.

cricheart · #29 November 30, 2012, 08:18 AM

Would be more fun if we could do it without Tamim as well. I'm now motivated enough to keep faith in our new cricket genos.

deshimon · #30 November 30, 2012, 08:22 AM

Only one match we win. We have more 4 matches remaining. We shouldn't judge with only one match. If we can win series without Shakib it will be great like we whitewashed New Zealand without Tamim. Then we can say we have ability to win without them.

Tigers_eye · #31 November 30, 2012, 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dilscoop
I get it, we can win couple of games here and there without Shakib. But lets not all "Shakib who," even jokingly, with 4 more games to go.

Fans, worst things in the world. They are just every where! I'm dealing with bunch of Alex Smith and Brian Wilson bashers.

I want Romo to bereplaced by Alex Smith. Trade him if you don't like him. I am sure he'll be back for San Fran.

Well Done BD!!

shuziburo · #32 November 30, 2012, 08:34 AM

Let's forget about this match and concentrate on the next one. We can celebrate after we win the series.

*AsifTheManRahman* · #33 November 30, 2012, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dilscoop
I get it, we can win couple of games here and there without Shakib. But lets not all "Shakib who," even jokingly, with 4 more games to go.

Fans, worst things in the world. They are just every where! I'm dealing with bunch of Alex Smith and Brian Wilson bashers.

Well Dilscoop, you have to admit that Shakib brings to the team the kind of arrogance and selfish attitude (re: his dismissal in the 90's gooing for the hundred when the team needed him to stay) that are contagious and detrimental to the team's development. Now that the guys believe they can win even when he isn't around, I think it is safe to say that we're done with him and that his theatrics are better left outside the team. I think it's time for us to move on - we have a coherent bunch here and given our current form, we're certainly up there in terms of quality along with the likes of South Africa and India.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Blackberry)

BANFAN · #34 November 30, 2012, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsifTheManRahman
Well,..................we're certainly up there in terms of quality along with the likes of South Africa and India....

........

ialbd · #35 November 30, 2012, 09:25 AM

Shakib himself will be proud of this team performance. But its not a question about can we win without him, we HAVE to, and i am glad to see the team starting to believe it.

Rubu · #36 November 30, 2012, 09:54 AM

In ODI, AND in BD, yes.

simon · #37 November 30, 2012, 09:59 AM

it's Tino Best who made the difference..not Sak

KnightBD · #38 November 30, 2012, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsifTheManRahman
Well Dilscoop, you have to admit that Shakib brings to the team the kind of arrogance and selfish attitude (re: his dismissal in the 90's gooing for the hundred when the team needed him to stay) that are contagious and detrimental to the team's development. Now that the guys believe they can win even when he isn't around, I think it is safe to say that we're done with him and that his theatrics are better left outside the team. I think it's time for us to move on - we have a coherent bunch here and given our current form, we're certainly up there in terms of quality along with the likes of South Africa and India.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Blackberry)

I feel disgusted that you are SuperModerator of this forum.

Tiger444 · #39 November 30, 2012, 10:35 AM

I think we can finally rely on other spinners and Shakib won't have to be depended upon with his bowling. To me, that's a huge step. We can't just rely on him to be our best bowler and batsman. Something had to give and I think it's best he plays more of a support role in bowling. Let Razzak and Gazi have the bowling workload for T20I's and ODI's and let Sunny and Gazi do their thing in Tests.

Like I've said many times before, rather than having him at #5, it's time we bring him in at #3 or #4 for all formats of the game. I feel this would be the best way to use Shakib and not over rely on him.

Purbasha T · #40 November 30, 2012, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnightBD
I feel disgusted that you are SuperModerator of this forum.

Lol you haven't been reading his recent comments, have you?!

*AsifTheManRahman* · #41 November 30, 2012, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnightBD
I feel disgusted that you are SuperModerator of this forum.

Shotti kotha shunte bhallage na tai na?

Sohel · #42 November 30, 2012, 11:28 AM

This is what I see upon Shakib's return:

1. Tamim
2. Bijoy
3. Nayeem/Shourobh
4. Shakib
5. Nasir
6. Mit'hu
7. Riyad
8. Raju
9. Koushik
10. Gazza
11. Rex/RBX

NO WALKING WICKET from 1-7 with Raju and Gazza both being able to actually bat, and Koushik slog for quick runs. I don't thonk we've ever had a team as balanced at this.

KnightBD · #43 November 30, 2012, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Purbasha T
Lol you haven't been reading his recent comments, have you?!

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsifTheManRahman
Shotti kotha shunte bhallage na tai na?

NO, I didn't read any other comments. I am not following the forum for some time due to my busy (

) schedule...

Sakib is the best player hands down, and he has much more to give in years to come.

BTW. At least I got to comment on my comment

(I don't think this happened ever before

)

zsayeed · #44 November 30, 2012, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oronnya
Shakib doesn't make any difference to the team. They still manage to lose even if Shakib pulls off a super performance and they still can win even if he is not there. It was never about Shakib it has always been about the team effort and this performance just proves that..

He does, his presence changes the mindset that other players think we can rely on him. Strange psychological game this - plus Shohag has been learning from Saqlain - and working harder than Shakib - off the field. He is his own man.

Dilscoop · #45 November 30, 2012, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tigers_eye
I want Romo to bereplaced by Alex Smith. Trade him if you don't like him. I am sure he'll be back for San Fran.

Well Done BD!!

Alex Smith would be appreciated in so many places right now. Niners are lucky to have two hot QBs while others cant even find a starter. Cards, Eagles, Steelers, SD, KCC (your team-- he'd be like a Montana if he went there

), Jets...

I just hope Kaep don't choke in the playoffs.

Dilscoop · #46 November 30, 2012, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnightBD
I feel disgusted that you are SuperModerator of this forum.

This...

(I love it when brown people use the word disgusted for everything...)

Eshen · #47 November 30, 2012, 01:48 PM

IMO, Law should be credited for psychologically conditioning our players not be so dependent on Shakib-Tamim (ie to negate the psychology that was developed during Siddons era).

*AsifTheManRahman* · #48 November 30, 2012, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dilscoop
(I love it when brown people use the word disgusted for everything...)

That's disgusting.

Purbasha T · #49 November 30, 2012, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dilscoop
This...

(I love it when brown people use the word disgusted for everything...)

What are you, white or something?

Dilscoop · #50 November 30, 2012, 02:29 PM

Why is it that every time I mention the color brown I get replies on "racism" bases. Like a reverse-"racism" thing going on here. Because I'm brown I can't say it? Also how's calling it as it is racist? I'm sure you guys love Russell Peters. It doesn't bother you then does it...