So.... we can without Shakib? - Page 4

Night_wolf · #76 December 2, 2012, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rabz
Shakib who ??

lol Rabz bhaia apnio fun e join korlen?

cricbook · #77 December 2, 2012, 11:16 PM

amader jeda.....

BANFAN · #78 December 3, 2012, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oronnya
You know what I was thinking that too !! We really don't need Shakib anymore.. He might find it hard to get back to the team

.. We definitely won't like to break the winning combination !!

I'm sure, team will prefer a better AR than Mullah and will be more than happy to replace him, if all the other positions are sealed....

Imteaz · #79 December 3, 2012, 12:58 AM

Team Bangladesh or Bangladesh Team!!!!!!!!!!

oronnya · #80 December 5, 2012, 11:06 AM

Today for the first time I missed Shakib. Looking at how WI were struggling against spin, 10 overs from Shakib could have made a difference . Also in the batting while BD was losing the plot completely he could have been the one to hold it up. Oh well who knows what would have happened. May be we would have still manage to lose but still we missed Shakib's service today

Night_wolf · #81 December 5, 2012, 11:11 AM

Shakib would have been a handful in this match,both with the bat and ball

nadim 98 · #82 December 5, 2012, 11:15 AM

Maybe not with the bat, but missed him with the bowl for sure

MyRoom · #83 December 5, 2012, 11:41 AM

Look I don't understand! Shakib doesn't have any broken bones so just let him play these last few matches and he can have a good 2 months break afterwards considering the next International assignment isn't until late February. We would've won the game if he had played instead of fluke man Naeem.

*AsifTheManRahman* · #84 December 5, 2012, 11:48 AM

We can't do anything or go anywhere without Shakib. We're screwed, we'll lose this 2-3 then 0-5 to Congo A. We're finished, done for.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Blackberry)

nadim 98 · #85 December 5, 2012, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsifTheManRahman
We can't do anything or go anywhere without Shakib. We're screwed, we'll lose this 2-3 then 0-5 to Congo A. We're finished, done for.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Blackberry)

Congo te sesh projon chance pailen apni? congrats! ektu doya raikhen apnar motherland er proti. ekta game jitte diyen

KnightBD · #86 December 5, 2012, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oronnya
Today for the first time I missed Shakib. Looking at how WI were struggling against spin, 10 overs from Shakib could have made a difference . Also in the batting while BD was losing the plot completely he could have been the one to hold it up. Oh well who knows what would have happened. May be we would have still manage to lose but still we missed Shakib's service today

cricheart · #87 December 5, 2012, 12:00 PM

Shakib needs to be back before BPL, thats seems to be higher prefered concern for bcb atm. And 2 wins already considered as success without him in the team.

NoName · #88 December 5, 2012, 12:31 PM

Going from 'Shak w.e' to despair lol.

*AsifTheManRahman* · #89 December 5, 2012, 12:32 PM

Shakib injure howe pura nogno kore dilo amader. Shakib chara amra oshohay, nengta shotto etai.

kalpurush · #90 December 5, 2012, 12:39 PM

Ekhon bujha gelo to no man can beat Ice Man.

BANFAN · #91 December 5, 2012, 12:42 PM

Shakib thakteo to Ora test match e amaderke nogno korey e diesilo..... And they won twice without him... So. Shakib alone can't do anything..... If Mushy decided to bowl Rubel, what could Shakib do??

Tiger444 · #92 December 5, 2012, 12:42 PM

I think we see the effect of not having Shakib today. He holds the batting together and also provides an excellent option as a bowler. Riyad and Naeem are decent but not on the level of Shakib.

Nothing we can do though because he's injured and we also have to learn to win matches without him since he won't be here forever.

zsayeed · #93 December 5, 2012, 01:46 PM

shakib would have made an individual effect - but today the team lost as a team. Not a Shakib loss - but a joint loss.

dark mage · #94 December 5, 2012, 02:03 PM

And is it just me or does Nasir always play better when Shakib is around? They have had so many partnerships

Crisis · #95 December 5, 2012, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dark mage
And is it just me or does Nasir always play better when Shakib is around? They have had so many partnerships

Exaactly what I have observed. Nasir and Shakib play very well together and they get good partnership scores. Batting order should always have Shakib and Nasir together.

Murad · #96 December 5, 2012, 03:03 PM

as if shakib thakle amra shob gulo matchi jiti.

his batting and bowling was missed but that wasn't the reason for the loss. top and middle order der mon ta onek boro tai shob gulo wicket biliye dilo. eto boro dil thakle kokhonoi match jita jabe na. shudhu shakib na shakiber moto aro thakle o na.