Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Updated: Wednesday, February 25, 2004
G. M. Bashar
|GuBulawayo means 'place of slaughter' in the local language. Now I know why they
don't call it the Bulawayo Stadium and I certainly prefer the more sedate "Queens
Sports club". Queens Sports Club in Bulawayo, which is our next test venue,
has worked hard to make itself a good one-day pitch but for tests the pitch has
been a quagmire. After 14 matches, the acquired wisdom is that matches in Queens
are unlikely to be high scoring, as a well-earned reputation for slow and low
pitches has gradually taken shape. That said, Bulawayo could actually claim some
magnificent landmarks. Ever since 1994, when Zimbabwe hosted Sri Lanka, it has
been a safe haven for some good home performances. She has witnessed its share
of great moments, the most notable perhaps being the gruesome test against England
in 1996-97. Zimbabwe's defensive bowling tactics worked as England was
made to chase 205 from 37 overs to win the match. The Zimbabweans were bowling
down the leg side and the English just failed in their bid. So Queens has been
generous as to allow the weaker team to play defensively.
Dave Houghton, one of their preeminent batsmen of the day, made the highest individual score at Queen's when he hit 266 against Sri Lanka in 1994-95. Atapattu also returned the favour by scoring 216 five years later. Guy Whittall's 203 not out against New Zealand in 1997-98 is the other double-century scored there. Two leg-spinners, Adam Huckle and Paul Strang, have both taken ten wickets in a match at Queen's. In terms of hostile fast bowling, the medal goes to Wasim Akram in 1994-95 when his second-innings five for 43, on a difficult pitch, set Pakistan up for a win. Bulawayo has yet to reveal itself as a true spin pitch but there are small glimpses of evidence that the spinners have an advantage over pacers. It is also the ground where Price has shined consistently. This is good news for Rafique and I am expecting some crackers from him. The bad news is that Price would want a slice of the same pie.
So have we actually focused on the Queens pitch for the selection for the first test? Looking at the ground records and selecting a team specifically for this test could present us with some insights! Had they done so the team would have looked slightly different? A small disclaimer though. At the end of the day history and previous ground stats are interesting but it rests on individuals to prove that those stats are just an academic exercise. Having said that, certain thoughts could be pondered:
Looking at the last match played at Queens we can deduce that the pitch does take spin. In the Zimbabwe v West Indies match Price was certainly the thorn causing all sorts of trouble for the windies. The match also illustrated the best defence against that sort of bowling which was exemplified by Lara's 191 scored after facing 203 balls.
Teams have different reasons for including a spinner apart from the traditional feeling that a test team is not complete without one. For Bangladesh the points are pertinent too:
True, on the Queens pitch any lesser spinner than Warne, Murali or Kumble has struggled. However, after Rafique's successes in Harare we should probe the Zimbabweans in the very department that our team might have an advantage that is spin. Certainly we should reflect for a second, without any doubt, how our other spinners would perform. Even though there is the added danger of young bowler being severely punished, I believe we could take in a young and upcoming left arm spinner like Enamul Haq jnr. to press our case.
As for the case for throwing in young players into the lion's den we can debate on and on. What are the long-term effects of bowlers being punished, or will they stomach it and move on? But why not pick players at a ground, which will help him and build his confidence. At the end of the day the sincere hope is that we are slowly bringing rationale into our selection and ending the inconsistency that has marred our earlier outings.
|© All Rights Reserved