The Joker vs Batman (US Open 2010)

cricman · #1 September 11, 2010, 07:45 PM

Nadal going for the Career Slam, Novak saved 2 MP vs Fedborg and won an Epic Semifinal

Stream Womens FInal: http://www.usopen.org/en_US/console/...m/tennis/&alt=

Kim going for 3 in a Row, Vera going for #1

Zeeshan · #2 September 11, 2010, 08:01 PM

So where the heck does this Joker-Batman thing fit in exactly?

cricman · #3 September 11, 2010, 08:06 PM

pronounce Djokovic

Vera in full meltdown mode, crying, screaming, breaking rackets etc.

_Rafi_ · #4 September 11, 2010, 10:20 PM

I'm happy as long as one of Federer or Nadal or Djoker winning and Murray,Roddick is not winning!

Habib · #5 September 11, 2010, 11:24 PM

Go Nadal. He usually make opponents cry while beating 'em.

nakibahmed · #6 September 12, 2010, 03:43 AM

really good match yesterday,iam a RF fan,but i was really happy to see the joker win yesterday,hope he wins the finals!

Tigers_eye · #7 September 12, 2010, 07:01 AM

Finally I am enjoying the final of a grand slam. No cry baby in the finals at least.

*reverse_swing* · #8 September 12, 2010, 09:50 AM

Seeing as stamina issues have plagued Djokovic throughout his entire career, my prediction would be Nadal to win in 4 sets even if Djokovic plays how he did against Federer and shows the same ability to win long rallies and serve well.

Habib · #9 September 12, 2010, 10:17 AM

Djokovic is praying for a rain delay so that he can regain his stamina.

Bancan · #10 September 12, 2010, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tigers_eye
Finally I am enjoying the final of a grand slam. No cry baby in the finals at least.

If you dont enjoy Roger Federer's tennis than I have doubts about how much you actually like tennis. Cry Baby? Shows how much he cares. I dont understand how you can enjoy a match where one of the player struggles to even finish a match half the time. Roger Federer > Pete Sampras.

cricman · #11 September 12, 2010, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bancan
If you dont enjoy Roger Federer's tennis than I have doubts about how much you actually like tennis. Cry Baby? Shows how much he cares. I dont understand how you can enjoy a match where one of the player struggles to even finish a match half the time. Roger Federer > Pete Sampras.

Tho Shall not talk about the Pete Sampras that way,

Federer a Product of a Weak Era not saying Roger isnt a great player but he isnt better than Pete, he couldnt even beat the Best Clay Court player of Petes Time

Nadal is a great player but he's going to have it alot harder than Fed did on Hard Courts, Novak, Murray & Del Potro are entiering their primes along w/ Nadal.

Roger had one nut case in Safin, who showed up once in a while. Roddick who is mentally weak, Andre who pushed him past his prime and Nadal who whopped him as a Teenager.

You give Pete Sampras Today's Rackets ... 140 mph serves the unreturnable ones the ones you cant block back ala Roddick

Rain go away

Bancan · #12 September 12, 2010, 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cricman
Tho Shall not talk about the Pete Sampras that way,

Federer a Product of a Weak Era not saying Roger isnt a great player but he isnt better than Pete, he couldnt even beat the Best Clay Court player of Petes Time

Nadal is a great player but he's going to have it alot harder than Fed did on Hard Courts, Novak, Murray & Del Potro are entiering their primes along w/ Nadal.

Roger had one nut case in Safin, who showed up once in a while. Roddick who is mentally weak, Andre who pushed him past his prime and Nadal who whopped him as a Teenager.

You give Pete Sampras Today's Rackets ... 140 mph serves the unreturnable ones the ones you cant block back ala Roddick

Rain go away

I hate that argument. In that sense players before Pete's era was better than him because they didnt have some of the technologies that he did.

Regarding playing in a weak era. Thats fair to an extent. But again cannot comment on it much as I havent seen much of Pete's era. All i know 16>14 and thus Roger> Pete. Every sport works that way. Numbers talk. Fed has the numbers to prove it.

Either way. About the final. Nadal should win it. I wanna see him get his career grand slam. Novak should put up a good fight. Heat isnt going to be an issue. So yeah. Cause we all know if its hot, Novak cant even walk. Annoys me as to how much he suffers in the heat.

cricman · #13 September 13, 2010, 07:29 PM

A set all 1-1 in the 3rd

Tigers_eye · #14 September 15, 2010, 07:15 PM

So the New Sheriff is ruling with iron fist, eh? Just a single set loss in the entire US Open? Mind boggling. The critics of one dimension player are not happy (must be).

Congrats Nadal. Wow!!! All four silverware at one house.