|
Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket
|
View Poll Results: Should ICC ban the switch handed reverse slog sweep?
|
Yes
|
![](images/polls/bar2-l.gif) ![](images/polls/bar2.gif) ![](images/polls/bar2-r.gif)
|
1 |
6.25% |
No
|
![](images/polls/bar3-l.gif) ![](images/polls/bar3.gif) ![](images/polls/bar3-r.gif)
|
15 |
93.75% |
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 16, 2008, 05:57 PM
|
![Ishtylish cricketer's Avatar](image.php?u=987&dateline=1206328466) |
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Favorite Player: Ian Bell
Posts: 1,662
|
|
Should ICC ban the switch handed reverse slog sweep?
England batsman Kevin Pietersen is in the limelight yet again. This time for cricketing reason. The "reverse slog sweep" he played left handed in the first ODI against Newzeland has drawn a lot of criticism. Many want this shot to be banned because it's unfair for the bowler and fielding captain who set up fielding knowing the "handedness" of the batsman and the same switching of hand for a bowler is not allowed. Bowlers argue that rules should be the same for all involved meaning if a bowler cannot enjoy the freedom of changing hand and side without telling the umpire, batsman should not have that liberty either. The balance between bat and ball becomes tainted otherwise. If a batsman changes both the stance and the grip to play a shot ie. reverse slog sweep after/about when the ball is delivered the batsman has a huge advantage as he can hit in the side which has less fielders and shorter in distance. When asked KP said he this shot should not be banned because he feels it is well within the rules and it had been played for a long time. Daniel Vettori said he doesn't mind it so long as the umpires are more flexible with the "wide" zone, and the lbw.
I thought that stroke of Pietersen was a hall mark of a genius and an index of measurement for his talent. I really wonder what Scott Styris thought of that shot?
What do you guys think? Should this version of sweep be banned?
Last edited by Ishtylish cricketer; June 21, 2008 at 07:41 AM..
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 16, 2008, 06:24 PM
|
BanglaCricket Staff
|
|
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Location: Manchester,UK
Favorite Player: bhujee kom
Posts: 22,656
|
|
No they should not.
They should allow the bowlers to switch to make it even contest for both batsmen and bowlers If they feel it is unfair to bowler because they are not allowed to switch when they bowl.
__________________
![bdflag](images/smilies/bdflag.gif) I love Bangladesh cricket and that's why I found BanglaCricket.com
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 16, 2008, 06:37 PM
|
![Yameen's Avatar](image.php?u=594&dateline=1167434747) |
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: June 27, 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Jayasuria
Posts: 2,078
|
|
I think this should not be allowed at all..Firstly its unfair on the opposition and 2ndly if it is allowed, allowing bowlers to switch hands as well would just be ridiculus and would add a whole new dimension to the game of mind games n ultra stupidity in my opinion and things should just remain be as be since invention of cricket.
__________________
Jamie Siddons is at slip, and decided enough is enough. He yells out. "For christ sake, it's not a 'f*ckin test match."
Waugh replies: " Of course it isn't … You're here. "
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 16, 2008, 07:24 PM
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273
|
|
is it any less fair than say facing a bowler like mendis who bowls leggys and offys whenever he pleases? shouldn't batsmen be able to know what type of style of bowling they're facing each ball? you could introduce them as "mystery" spinners/bowlers but then if they do that then batsman should be introduced as mystery batsmen and be able to change hands and/or stance whenever they want.
also the reverse sweep has it's advantages as a fielding side as well. unless the batsman practices it hours on end in the nets they're not that use to making contact with the ball in that manner, plus they have to change hands in the first place which takes time away from the batsman. the fielding team probably has more chance of getting a batsman out when they play the reverse sweep than when they don't.
the current rules on reverse sweep don't bother me, but the shot really isn't played that often so banning it wouldn't make too much of a difference i don't think.
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 16, 2008, 07:39 PM
|
BanglaCricket Staff
|
|
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Location: Manchester,UK
Favorite Player: bhujee kom
Posts: 22,656
|
|
Well spotted Gowza.
I cant see why the big fuss bowler (styris) clearly saw pieterson changed his stance and bowled on his leg stump (of stump when KP switched) and gave him enough room to hit the ball out of the park. He should have stick to his original off stump line and if KP missed umpire would not call it wide.
__________________
![bdflag](images/smilies/bdflag.gif) I love Bangladesh cricket and that's why I found BanglaCricket.com
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 16, 2008, 11:36 PM
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273
|
|
also what about batsmen who walk across their crease? that's changing their stance and plenty of players do that. changing of the grip i can certainly see as being an issue but you can always bring up the point that bowlers are allowed to change their grip on the ball so why shouldn't batsmen be able to change their grip?
bowlers have just as many things if not more that they can do to trick/unnerve the batsmen e.g. bowling from a different angle, different pace, different grip, different style.
not that i'm necessarily saying they shouldn't ban this but i think there's more to think about than just saying it's unfair to change from right to left handed for batsmen when bowlers can't. there are plenty of things bowlers can do that you could say are unfair, same as batsmen. i mean is it really fair that batsmen can walk out of their crease to hit the ball but bowlers have to bowl from the line? not really but that's just part of the game (same as the things i mentioned above about bowlers).
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 16, 2008, 11:51 PM
|
![Ishtylish cricketer's Avatar](image.php?u=987&dateline=1206328466) |
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Favorite Player: Ian Bell
Posts: 1,662
|
|
What about the wide issue? If a righty turns lefty what's wide and what's not wide or legal? If the bowler picks up the batsman switching hands and decides to bowl a delivery well wide off the pads of the turned left hander who normally bats right handed, would that be called a wide? What's wide in that situation?
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 17, 2008, 12:37 AM
|
![BANFAN's Avatar](image.php?u=4373&dateline=1301941189) |
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: March 26, 2007
Favorite Player: Bangladesh Team
Posts: 18,761
|
|
Why should it be banned? Why do people want too much controlled a game? Innovations and improvisations are the pleasure of every game, why u want to make a real game look like a computer game?
The fielding team captain has the flexibility to place his fielders for that. And let the bowlers look for improvizations to make the shot risky.
__________________
[Post CWC19 Consistency Record: [B]Test: W-0 L-0 D-0/B]// ODI: W-0 L-3 // T20: W-0 L-0]
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 17, 2008, 02:45 AM
|
Moderator BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: August 23, 2003
Posts: 3,494
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ishtylish cricketer
What about the wide issue? If a righty turns lefty what's wide and what's not wide or legal? If the bowler picks up the batsman switching hands and decides to bowl a delivery well wide off the pads of the turned left hander who normally bats right handed, would that be called a wide? What's wide in that situation?
|
Even now wide takes into account the position of the batsman when the ball reaches him. A ball a foot outside the leg-stump is normally a wide, but if the batsman had backed up two feet outside the leg, the umpire wouldn't call it. The adjustment of the wide calls for the altered stance should just be an extension of it.
Second thoughts - Not that simple. A proper ball outside the off stump should not be called a wide just because the batsman turned around and became a left-hander at the right time ! Perhaps, it should be called a wide only if it wide in the batsman's normal as well as new stance ?
Last edited by Tintin; June 17, 2008 at 02:59 AM..
Reason: counter-argument
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 17, 2008, 08:08 AM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: February 21, 2005
Location: in the blue planet
Posts: 3,822
|
|
It is a trivial issue. Why they did not ban googly, dusra or famed reverse swing. Batsmen always faced dilema facing these types of balls as those deceived the batsmen as balls direction is complete opposite of the general directon of the type of bowlers. If so called Guardians want a fair contest of bat and ball, let the power play reduced to 10 overs or flexible powerplay. But I would prefer six bouncers should be allowed. If you are good enough batsman you could hook or pull; if you are just a pretender you would be caught
__________________
Twenty20 is not a gentleman's game. It's like a one-night stand and not a marriage. It is a street format and the goonda doesn't know what is a late cut or a cover drive
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 17, 2008, 11:36 AM
|
![Tigers_eye's Avatar](image.php?u=1743&dateline=1537290614) |
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: June 30, 2005
Location: Little Rock
Favorite Player: Viv Richards, Steve Waugh
Posts: 32,798
|
|
The only issue I have is the change of ruling in calling wide. In the middle of the bowlers stride if the batsman swtiches position to get an advantage of leg side fielding gaps to off side fielding gaps then wides shouldn't be called if the ball goes by the (new) leg side (original off side). The Captain of the fielding team has to make that call on how to set fielding on players who can switch sides.
__________________
The Weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is an attribute of the Strong." - Gandhi.
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 17, 2008, 11:44 AM
|
![Kabir's Avatar](image.php?u=2987&dateline=1176604066) |
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: September 3, 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Favorite Player: Sakib - the real Tiger
Posts: 11,194
|
|
If a batsman is capable of doing something, some get happy...and some, as you can see, call for the batsman to be stopped from playing to his potential.
What a joke!
Anway, I agree with Mijan bhai here.
__________________
cricket is a PROCESS, not an EVENT or two. -- Sohel_NR
Fans need to stop DUI (Dreaming Under Influence)!
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 17, 2008, 03:06 PM
|
![Sovik's Avatar](image.php?u=1829&dateline=1208654095) |
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Favorite Player: Brian Charles Lara
Posts: 9,242
|
|
I never seen any player apart from Pietersen playing this shot and hitting sixes. it would have been really stupid if ICC banned it
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 17, 2008, 08:00 PM
|
![Ishtylish cricketer's Avatar](image.php?u=987&dateline=1206328466) |
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Favorite Player: Ian Bell
Posts: 1,662
|
|
What about lbw? What's outside off and outside leg?
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 17, 2008, 09:56 PM
|
Administrator BanglaCricket Founder
|
|
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Virginia, USA
Favorite Player: তামীম, শা
Posts: 9,472
|
|
Is this serious ? If it is, than ICC has simply too much time in their hands.
As for the poll: No ban for Kevin. Yes 'ban' for all the Bangladeshi pretenders (they look awkward and mostly manage to get out playing any sort of reverse sweep). ![smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
__________________
Bangladesh - World Champions - World Cup 20**
বাংলাদেশ - বিশ্ব চাম্পিয়ন - বিশ্বকাপ ক্রিকেট ২০**
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 18, 2008, 12:04 AM
|
![BANFAN's Avatar](image.php?u=4373&dateline=1301941189) |
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: March 26, 2007
Favorite Player: Bangladesh Team
Posts: 18,761
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ishtylish cricketer
What about lbw? What's outside off and outside leg?
|
LBW, Wide etc everything is in relation to BM's original stance !
__________________
[Post CWC19 Consistency Record: [B]Test: W-0 L-0 D-0/B]// ODI: W-0 L-3 // T20: W-0 L-0]
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 19, 2008, 06:57 AM
|
![Ishtylish cricketer's Avatar](image.php?u=987&dateline=1206328466) |
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Favorite Player: Ian Bell
Posts: 1,662
|
|
I want to see someone bowl a bouncer when the batsman's trying to switch grip and bat the ball out of the park. It may still go for 4, but I would like to see how KP would deal with it?
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 19, 2008, 08:52 AM
|
![BANFAN's Avatar](image.php?u=4373&dateline=1301941189) |
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: March 26, 2007
Favorite Player: Bangladesh Team
Posts: 18,761
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ishtylish cricketer
I want to see someone bowl a bouncer when the batsman's trying to switch grip and bat the ball out of the park. It may still go for 4, but I would like to see how KP would deal with it?
|
Specially if that is well directed around the chest !!
__________________
[Post CWC19 Consistency Record: [B]Test: W-0 L-0 D-0/B]// ODI: W-0 L-3 // T20: W-0 L-0]
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 21, 2008, 02:06 AM
|
![Surfer's Avatar](image.php?u=5084&dateline=1232169358) |
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: May 20, 2007
Posts: 1,341
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tintin
Even now wide takes into account the position of the batsman when the ball reaches him. A ball a foot outside the leg-stump is normally a wide, but if the batsman had backed up two feet outside the leg, the umpire wouldn't call it. The adjustment of the wide calls for the altered stance should just be an extension of it.
Second thoughts - Not that simple. A proper ball outside the off stump should not be called a wide just because the batsman turned around and became a left-hander at the right time ! Perhaps, it should be called a wide only if it wide in the batsman's normal as well as new stance ?
|
I believe in a case like this, the batsman should not get the benefit of leg side wide at all. The moment you change hand, irrespective of which side the ball is bowled, it should be called a wide only if it goes past the wide mark. Since the batsman is playing around, there should be something at stake as well.
I do not see any reason why the shot should not be allowed. Improvisations/innovations are always welcome.
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 21, 2008, 06:53 AM
|
![Sohel's Avatar](image.php?u=4682&dateline=1403511947) |
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: April 18, 2007
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Nazimuddin
Posts: 35,464
|
|
Some of my friends at TRIKON are duly concerned about all this switch-hitting phobia.
__________________
"And do not curse those who call on other than GOD, lest they blaspheme and curse GOD, out of ignorance. We have adorned the works of every group in their eyes. Ultimately, they return to their Lord, then He informs them of everything they had done." (Qur'an 6:108)
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 22, 2008, 03:07 PM
|
![BANFAN's Avatar](image.php?u=4373&dateline=1301941189) |
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: March 26, 2007
Favorite Player: Bangladesh Team
Posts: 18,761
|
|
Ian Chappel is a strong advocate for banning switch. Here is his detailed reasoning for that: The problem with switch-hitting
Quote:
It is unfair to ask bowlers to say beforehand how they are going to operate and then not subject batsmen to the same rule
|
But I agree with the above, the bowlers could be given the freedom to change hands. Why not ?
__________________
[Post CWC19 Consistency Record: [B]Test: W-0 L-0 D-0/B]// ODI: W-0 L-3 // T20: W-0 L-0]
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
June 22, 2008, 03:12 PM
|
![Sovik's Avatar](image.php?u=1829&dateline=1208654095) |
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Favorite Player: Brian Charles Lara
Posts: 9,242
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BANFAN
Ian Chappel is a strong advocate for banning switch. Here is his detailed reasoning for that: The problem with switch-hitting
But I agree with the above, the bowlers could be given the freedom to change hands. Why not ?
|
Why don't they give the bowlers permission to switch arm and maintain the line and length
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
July 10, 2008, 04:49 PM
|
![JonBain's Avatar](image.php?u=6556&dateline=1197232328) |
Club Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: December 9, 2007
Location: Nelson Mandela Bay
Favorite Player: Wasim & Waqar
Posts: 145
|
|
The bowler has the right to abort his runup if he feels put off by what the batsman is doing.
as someone who bats left or right handed,
and bowls left or right handed
i feel its unfair to penalise innovation.
my strength is bowling tho (6/13)
and i would have no problem getting hit for six like that
it would make me smile to see it happen off my bowling
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
July 11, 2008, 10:05 AM
|
![Beamer's Avatar](image.php?u=243&dateline=1244931010) |
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: December 15, 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Favorite Player: Viv Richards, Sid Crosby.
Posts: 9,732
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sohel NR
Some of my friends at TRIKON are duly concerned about all this switch-hitting phobia.
|
![lol](images/smilies/lol.gif) ![lol](images/smilies/lol.gif) ![lol](images/smilies/lol.gif) ha ha nice one..
I would like to see a bowler charging in, then right before delivery, if he has the ability to do so, switch delivery hand.
|
![Old](images/BanglaCricket/statusicon/post_old.gif)
July 11, 2008, 02:31 PM
|
![JonBain's Avatar](image.php?u=6556&dateline=1197232328) |
Club Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: December 9, 2007
Location: Nelson Mandela Bay
Favorite Player: Wasim & Waqar
Posts: 145
|
|
Quote:
I would like to see a bowler charging in, then right before delivery, if he has the ability to do so, switch delivery hand.
|
yes you have to decide before you run up which hand you are going to bowl with, and the style should make it obvious which hand you are going to use.
when i bowl with my wrong hand its only gentle right arm spinners or stock medium pace. nothing half as scary as my left hand lightning strikes
it only works once in a game. after that they know what you are up to.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:52 PM.
|
|