facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 20, 2011, 11:18 AM
cricman's Avatar
cricman cricman is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 8, 2005
Location: Deleting Evidence
Favorite Player: Dubya
Posts: 10,102
Default 30's in T20 = 50's in Other Forms of the Game?

Watched my 1st IPL game, and they had a Stat called Thirties for the Batsmen.

Some Food for Thought, I guess
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old April 20, 2011, 12:23 PM
Dilscoop Dilscoop is offline
Cricket Guru
Commissioner, MLC
 
Join Date: March 22, 2010
Posts: 13,532

Ya I just noticed it too when Shakib came to bat today. That's BS. Scoring runs in T20 should be lot easier. You can't say 30 in T20 is equal to a Test 50, or even an ODI 50.

I think it's mainly because there are lot of 30's and 40's in T20, not a lot of big score (which is not true, people are scoring 100s lately)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 20, 2011, 12:39 PM
Jonas's Avatar
Jonas Jonas is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: February 20, 2011
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Freddie Flintoff
Posts: 303

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilscoop
Ya I just noticed it too when Shakib came to bat today. That's BS. Scoring runs in T20 should be lot easier. You can't say 30 in T20 is equal to a Test 50, or even an ODI 50.

I think it's mainly because there are lot of 30's and 40's in T20, not a lot of big score (which is not true, people are scoring 100s lately)
No, big innings in Twenty20 are much more rare than in 50 over cricket. The average score in 50 over cricket is 250, while in Twenty20's it's about 150. So 150/250 * 50 = 30 is a fair assumption.

Of course, that doesn't mean it takes the same amount of cricketing skill to score 30 runs in Twenty20's as it does to score a 50 in 50-over cricket. But counting 30's in Twenty20 cricket makes more sense because 50's are so rare.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 20, 2011, 12:46 PM
Dilscoop Dilscoop is offline
Cricket Guru
Commissioner, MLC
 
Join Date: March 22, 2010
Posts: 13,532

^ That's what I was saying... You're agreeing but not agreeing...? lol

But I also said, it's not rare anymore, batsmen are scoring high 80s and 90s and 100s in T20 more often nowadays
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 20, 2011, 12:57 PM
Jonas's Avatar
Jonas Jonas is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: February 20, 2011
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Freddie Flintoff
Posts: 303

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilscoop
^ That's what I was saying... You're agreeing but not agreeing...? lol

But I also said, it's not rare anymore, batsmen are scoring high 80s and 90s and 100s in T20 more often nowadays
But it's still much rarer than in 50-over cricket. In most T20 games the highest individual score is 40-45 runs. So counting 50s/100s don't make too much sense because the numbers are going to be very low. By counting 30s it's possible to reflect an individual's contributions more meaningfully.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old April 20, 2011, 01:08 PM
Dilscoop Dilscoop is offline
Cricket Guru
Commissioner, MLC
 
Join Date: March 22, 2010
Posts: 13,532

... and I am agreeing with that
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket