We needed to play 3 tests at least, then we could have done well in the 3rd.

amim · #1 June 5, 2005, 07:46 PM

You can't blame the Bangladeshi batsman because in our 3 outings against the English we couldn't play to our potential.

We did it in the 4th time and we deserved 400 and we would have scored 400, had the umpiring been fair.

Now if we played when the Aussies would the weather would have suited us better it seems that we would have scored well and at least if played 3rd test, then it would have shown that we have already learned how to play against the English team.

None of our players played in longer version of the game before in England so that didn't help us but I am more interested in seeing how we perform in our next tour.

Edited on, June 6, 2005, 12:47 AM GMT, by amim.

*reverse_swing* · #2 June 5, 2005, 07:54 PM

What's the point of opening this new thread? Flipper already posted a similar type of thread few hours ago? Instead of posting similar types of thread every now and then it would be better if you express your views over there.

Edited on, June 6, 2005, 1:00 AM GMT, by reverse_swing.

reinausagi · #3 June 5, 2005, 08:02 PM

Woulda, coulda, shoulda...

Assuming the batsmen are now acclimatised to the alien English conditions, can we hope to see mature batting performances in the ODI series?

amim · #4 June 6, 2005, 05:26 AM

I didn't know about the other thread. Anyway i will appreciate if any of the moderatos lock this thread.

amra_korbo_joy · #5 June 6, 2005, 09:35 AM

To do good in England, we need at least 2 more quality bowler along with Mortoza. Taposh could play as 4 th pacer. Or may not be slected at all. We are lacking 2 more good pacers who can swing the ball and support Mortoza. Anawar is not test lavel bowler. So we need bowling coaching at age lavel to produce such quality bowler.. Untill then we should not play England in England.