Mohammad Shahzada

[khalek]

http://www.cricinfo.com/bangladesh/c...yer/56020.html

So when are we kicking Rubel out of the side and give this guy an opportunity? Just compare the FC records of Rubel and Shahzada, the selectors are dumb so are the BD fans for rating the below par Rubel so highly.

[wiseshah]

lol, this time what rubel has done wrong?

he just got 5 wkt few days ago

wrong time and wrong thread.

this shahjada/prince or rajputro------- will have to join in the long waiting list.

[khalek]

Originally Posted by wiseshah
lol, this time what rubel has done wrong?

he just got 5 wkt few days ago

wrong time and wrong thread.

this shahjada/prince or rajputro------- will have to join in the long waiting list.

Yeah and what a gorgeous five-fer it was!

O M R W Econ
29 1 166 5 5.72 (8nb, 3w)

8 nb and 3 wides and what a lovely economy rate, well that's just class by our standards isnt it?

[kalpurush]

Originally Posted by khalek
http://www.cricinfo.com/bangladesh/c...yer/56020.html

So when are we kicking Rubel out of the side and give this guy an opportunity? Just compare the FC records of Rubel and Shahzada, the selectors are dumb so are the BD fans for rating the below par Rubel so highly.

Ustad, shudhu upni-e budhdhiman! Amra upner dumb shishsho!!

[wiseshah]

lol, where do u get this shajada?

before him-- we have subhashis, talha, sajedul, emon, robin, rasel, alauddin babu,robiul islam shiplu.

and all of a sudden u bring shahzada and compare with rubel (to accomodate him we have to drop pacer like najmul and shahadat)

this shajada is not even in the top 20 bowler in NCL

[_Rafi_]

Demand of the year

Posted via BC Mobile Edition

[al-Sagar]

shahjada is decent player playing at the peak of his career.

rubel has just started his career, and has a lot of potential to go way way further than shahjada's reach.

rubel will show what he can be within the next one year.

[Bugz]

He's 23 years old. Hardly at the peak of his career.

[al-Sagar]

Originally Posted by Bugz
He's 23 years old. Hardly at the peak of his career.

some players, specially from subcontinent and specially from bd or pak peaks in 20-25 and then fades away

ash, aftab, kapali, nafees, rokon, opi, biddyut, sajal chowdhury......

then imrannazir, yasir hamid, wasti..... lots of examples.....

[nura43]

Rubel has the potential of becoming a speedster in BD team. we need real fast bowler.....not medium fast bowlers. What is Shahazada's average speed?

[beshideshi]

The stats are certainly more than impressive. An average of 21 is impressive no matter what the competition. He may be given a chance.
But the thing with Rubel is, he is a very rare breed. A real pacer who knocks 90mph barrier very often. and has the potential to become one of the finest pacer in the sub continent. And for that he needs experience, and out domestic standard is not yet good enough to help groom world class players. That's why I think Rubel should be exposed to international cricket as it will help him grow.

[wiseshah]

we need more a or academy team tour

[khalek]

He's picked up a 6 fer just a few days ago in a match where 3-104 was the 2nd best bowling figures so that says something about him.

Ok I agree Rubel is probably only BD bowler who's got the ability to bowl 6 deliveries in an over @ 140-145 kph but then 'Pace is not everything' comes in to mind. Look at Kemar Roach, he looks a sensational bowler cause he broke Ricky's elbow but is he as effective as say Bollinger, Steyn or Zaheer Khan? Mohammad Aamer is probably the only bowler who uses his pace well and already looks like a star but Rubel is not even half a star.

What's the use of other bowlers performing regularly at the NCL and then guys like Rubel getting opportunities after averaging 150 in a season with the ball? Are the selectors nuts? It's not about pace and sheer aggression but it's about being effective and being able to pick up wickets/controlling the runs and imo Rubel fails at both.

[al-Sagar]

Originally Posted by khalek
He's picked up a 6 fer just a few days ago in a match where 3-104 was the 2nd best bowling figures so that says something about him.

Ok I agree Rubel is probably only BD bowler who's got the ability to bowl 6 deliveries in an over @ 140-145 kph but then 'Pace is not everything' comes in to mind. Look at Kemar Roach, he looks a sensational bowler cause he broke Ricky's elbow but is he as effective as say Bollinger, Steyn or Zaheer Khan? Mohammad Aamer is probably the only bowler who uses his pace well and already looks like a star but Rubel is not even half a star.

What's the use of other bowlers performing regularly at the NCL and then guys like Rubel getting opportunities after averaging 150 in a season with the ball? Are the selectors nuts? It's not about pace and sheer aggression but it's about being effective and being able to pick up wickets/controlling the runs and imo Rubel fails at both.

so who got wickets against NZ, though he gave a lot of runs.

who got the figures of 4/33 against srilanka and won us the match, though it was shakibs innings that was more influential.

we have seen the likes of dollar mahmud and robin given the chance play for national team and just see the difference. the stats they have in national cricket doesnot replicate in international cricket.

all our bowlers, when they go to international arena goes for runs, specially pacers. because all of them are not consistent and pitch the ball way short or full, which is giving them wickets in domestic level but that goes for runs in international level.

[khalek]

Originally Posted by offstump
so who got wickets against NZ, though he gave a lot of runs.

who got the figures of 4/33 against srilanka and won us the match, though it was shakibs innings that was more influential.

we have seen the likes of dollar mahmud and robin given the chance play for national team and just see the difference. the stats they have in national cricket doesnot replicate in international cricket.

all our bowlers, when they go to international arena goes for runs, specially pacers. because all of them are not consistent and pitch the ball way short or full, which is giving them wickets in domestic level but that goes for runs in international level.

Those are just couple of performances. The five fer against NZ doesn't count really, it was just terrible. He was known as a very good OD bowler when he first came to the scene and he proved that against SL and then what happened? He was one of the main culprits for our exit from the T20 world in 2009 (Check his figures) Yes he did bowl with pace but he wasn't effective.

Statswise even Baisya and Jubair had better starts to their careers than Rubel. What really is the guarantee that he will turn into a great bowler one day even with coaching and stuff? Yes he can get good bounce and reverse the ball a little bit but he doesn't seem to be able to use it. He can improve on those but it will take him ages to improve on them as he is just another stubborn Bangladeshi seamer who just wants to spray the bowl around. How much time can we waste on his development or rather how many matches can we lose just for the sake of his development?

[B_IKHAN_71]

Originally Posted by khalek
Those are just couple of performances. The five fer against NZ doesn't count really, it was just terrible. He was known as a very good OD bowler when he first came to the scene and he proved that against SL and then what happened? He was one of the main culprits for our exit from the T20 world in 2009 (Check his figures) Yes he did bowl with pace but he wasn't effective.

Statswise even Baisya and Jubair had better starts to their careers than Rubel. What really is the guarantee that he will turn into a great bowler one day even with coaching and stuff? Yes he can get good bounce and reverse the ball a little bit but he doesn't seem to be able to use it. He can improve on those but it will take him ages to improve on them as he is just another stubborn Bangladeshi seamer who just wants to spray the bowl around. How much time can we waste on his development or rather how many matches can we lose just for the sake of his development?

looks like this guy khalek has relli gott it in 4 rubel in his eyes no mata what he duz looks like hil always hav a bad thing to say abbt him ., am i rung ???
Anyway is dis guy shazada related to you or something , y the sudden hypee.??

[yaseer]

As far as I remember, Shahjada was tried in "A" team before and performed badly.

[khalek]

Originally Posted by yaseer
As far as I remember, Shahjada was tried in "A" team before and performed badly.

He hasn't gone on any 'A' tours but he has played for BCB XI against some international touring side. Even if he underperformed, that counts as only one opportunity in which he failed but look at Rubel, he is failing all the time yet he's being given so many opportunities but we just don't realize how many games is losing for us with his undisciplined bowling as he manages to somehow make up for it with his quick bowling and win our hearts.

[Eshen]

Originally Posted by yaseer
As far as I remember, Shahjada was tried in "A" team before and performed badly.

You are remembering wrong matches then. Shahzada last played for the A-team back in 2006, against Zimbabwe, and did pretty well.

http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archiv...07/107481.html
http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archiv...07/107482.html

[khalek]

Originally Posted by Eshen
You are remembering wrong matches then. Shahzada last played for the A-team back in 2006, against Zimbabwe, and did pretty well.

http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archiv...07/107481.html
http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archiv...07/107482.html

Just look at those performances, they were 4 years and I still can't believe he hasn't played for Bangladesh and on the other hand, Rubel is being referrred as the pace sensation for no reason.

Screw the selectors.

[One World]

Originally Posted by khalek
Just look at those performances, they were 4 years and I still can't believe he hasn't played for Bangladesh and on the other hand, Rubel is being referrred as the pace sensation for no reason.

Screw the selectors.

Looked and agree on the bolded part because Dolar > Shahzada and he is not in the team. If anybody have a doubt on this equality read the Cricinfo article when Dolar, missing an important L in the middle, how started to sweep up the currency market on a given day .

[WarWolf]

Originally Posted by yaseer
As far as I remember, Shahjada was tried in "A" team before and performed badly.

He has done extremely well against Zim A team in 2006 in two 4 day matches.

[jisaan]

Originally Posted by WarWolf
He has done extremely well against Zim A team in 2006 in two 4 day matches.

and this is Twenty Ten!
and he is struggling to find a place in a DPL team (Mohammedan)
and he is struggling to find a place in an NCL team (Rajshahi)
.... things are getting worse for him now-a-days

[al-Sagar]

rubel has shown he can trouble batsman with his bounce, his pace, his reverse swing. but every now and then he bowls a boundary ball. also i have seen in a match when he should have bowled yorkers ashraful was asking him to bowl bouncers and he was being pulled for 4s and 6s.

we have a great prospect in rubel, but we need to to grow him and use him properly.

[hoodlum]

I'm speechless by your demand! LOL
All i can say is keep dreaming...