facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search
 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket
Reload this Page Shahadat Hossain to replace Nazmul Hossain in Bangladesh Squad
Forum Rules Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 > Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old January 2, 2010, 12:29 PM
ialbd's Avatar
ialbd ialbd is offline
Cricket Legend
  
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,845
Shahadat bowling to Sehwag..... gives me a shiver thinking of the aftermath...

Nazmul will be missed. Get fit soon Nazmul...
__________________
KingKortobboBimur.....
Reply With Quote

  #27  
Old January 2, 2010, 12:47 PM
cricket_pagol's Avatar
cricket_pagol cricket_pagol is offline
Cricket Legend
  
Join Date: July 20, 2004
Location: Indiana
Favorite Player: Mashrafee & Shakib
Posts: 6,071
I think Rubel or Shafiul will take nazmul's place in the team. I don't see Shahadat making it to the eleven with his current form.
__________________
Win Or Lose - We are ALWAYS with you BANGLADESH
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old January 2, 2010, 01:05 PM
AsifTheManRahman's Avatar
AsifTheManRahman AsifTheManRahman is offline
Super Moderator
BC Editorial Team
  
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678
Can't rely much on Rubel and Shafiul. Looks like Rasel's going to have to do all the hard work. We might even see spinners come in early.
__________________
Screw the IPL, I'm going to the MLC!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old January 2, 2010, 01:37 PM
Eshen's Avatar
Eshen Eshen is offline
Cricket Guru
  
Join Date: August 27, 2007
Posts: 14,497
Now I think Dolar and Robin have a genuine case to complain. I would have picked one of them ahead of Shahadat.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old January 2, 2010, 01:49 PM
Rizvi's Avatar
Rizvi Rizvi is offline
Test Cricketer
  
Join Date: June 25, 2005
Location: New York
Favorite Player: Mashrafe Mortaza
Posts: 1,098
I just don't understand this continous fascination with Shahadat!! What has he done to deserve this??

Agree with Ehsen - 100% Dollar or Robin should've gotten the nod ahead of Shahadat..
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old January 2, 2010, 01:52 PM
Ajfar's Avatar
Ajfar Ajfar is offline
Cricket Sage
  
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 17,886
We are so screwed
__________________
"I was the happiest man in the world, happier than Bill Gates"- Tamim Iqbal
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old January 2, 2010, 02:03 PM
fais fais is offline
Test Cricketer
  
Join Date: January 31, 2004
Location: UK
Favorite Player: Shakib Al Hasan
Posts: 1,200
as everybody has already said why do we keep on choosing the ineffective Shahadat
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old January 2, 2010, 02:04 PM
Dhruvo Dhruvo is offline
Cricket Legend
  
Join Date: July 9, 2007
Posts: 4,516
They better not play shahadat, he ruins the hard work done by other bowlers most of the time by giving away too many runs off his overs. We should go with rasel-rubel-shafiul for our pace attack.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old January 2, 2010, 02:16 PM
Catskills Catskills is offline
First Class Cricketer
  
Join Date: January 10, 2009
Posts: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by AsifTheManRahman
Can't rely much on Rubel and Shafiul. Looks like Rasel's going to have to do all the hard work. We might even see spinners come in early.
The only problem about Rasel is that he is not performing well for a long time. He was so good during the world cup. He has lost his teeth since then, probably due to injury or something else. So I am skeptical about his performance. Nazmul is doing quite well recently.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old January 2, 2010, 02:27 PM
Eshen's Avatar
Eshen Eshen is offline
Cricket Guru
  
Join Date: August 27, 2007
Posts: 14,497
IMO, not having Nazmul will prolly effect more at death than in first two PPs. We have seen in DPL how ineffective Shakib and other SLAs can be at death. IMO, we should pick both Shafi and Rubel to cover last 10 overs, while Rasel can open with one of them.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old January 2, 2010, 02:34 PM
al Furqaan's Avatar
al Furqaan al Furqaan is offline
Cricket Sage
  
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eshen
IMO, not having Nazmul will prolly effect more at death than in first two PPs. We have seen in DPL how ineffective Shakib and other SLAs can be at death. IMO, we should pick both Shafi and Rubel to cover last 10 overs, while Rasel can open with one of them.
agreed.

this is bad news...nazmul was in peak form, and was bowling very well, IMO.

lets just hope rajib doesn't play, and if he does, keeps his econ under 6.5 and takes a couople of wickets.

rasel and rubel it will have to be. and the death overs are going to be bad...we'll prolly have to throw razzak in at the death (w/rubel) and cross our fingers.
__________________
Bangladesh: Our Dream, Our Joy, Our Team

#OneTeam1Dream
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old January 2, 2010, 02:40 PM
t697318 t697318 is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: June 7, 2009
Posts: 106
i agree, not with tareq aziz, but with mahbubul, or even with dolar mahmud as a good replacement for nazmul hossain. shahadat isn't good, and he didn't improove that much i think after his come back, when he was dropped from the side early in 2009. mahbubul alam does swing the ball, new or old, windy or not, he is a genuine swinger of the ball, and i don't think we have that now. . e.
well, now it will be an uphill battle to defeat 2 depleted sides.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old January 2, 2010, 02:41 PM
mahbubH's Avatar
mahbubH mahbubH is offline
Cricket Legend
  
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Giggs, Gower, and Wasim!
Posts: 4,729
now we have Rasel, Rubel, Shafiul, and Shahadat. now this area is definitely our weakest area in the team. I am just hoping that we don't need Shahdat in the series. Nazu was doing very well last couple of series.
__________________
West Indies
Pakistan-India-Australia-SriLanka-SouthAfrica-NewZealand-WestIndies-England
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old January 2, 2010, 02:58 PM
Imtiazk Imtiazk is offline
Cricket Legend
  
Join Date: April 9, 2006
Posts: 2,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by AsifTheManRahman
Can't rely much on Rubel and Shafiul. Looks like Rasel's going to have to do all the hard work. We might even see spinners come in early.
To be absolutely honest, I wouldn't mind opening with Rasel and Razzak. Sakib coming on in the 10th over. Riyad and Naeem being the other two. Aftab and possibly, Ash can be the fill-in. That way we can include Shahriar in the team.

I really do not want to give Sehwag and the other Indians pace to play with. I know they can hit spinners too but our medium pacers without control would be just meat and drink.

I haven't seen Shafi, so can't comment !
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old January 2, 2010, 04:25 PM
Zeeshan's Avatar
Zeeshan Zeeshan is offline
Cricket Savant
  
Join Date: March 9, 2008
Location: Ω
Posts: 35,908
Calamity.....might as well forfeit.
__________________
Atman

Official Website |Amazon | Twitter/X | YouTube|Cricket Articles
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old January 2, 2010, 04:32 PM
Tendulkar_Mcgrath's Avatar
Tendulkar_Mcgrath Tendulkar_Mcgrath is offline
Test Cricketer
  
Join Date: May 26, 2006
Location: Newyork,USA
Favorite Player: Sakib,Tamim, Mashrafe
Posts: 1,690
Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee...no shahadat....and if Shahadat is bowling, I can predict his bowling figure...
8-0-84-0
__________________
Bangladeshi...
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old January 2, 2010, 04:33 PM
Tendulkar_Mcgrath's Avatar
Tendulkar_Mcgrath Tendulkar_Mcgrath is offline
Test Cricketer
  
Join Date: May 26, 2006
Location: Newyork,USA
Favorite Player: Sakib,Tamim, Mashrafe
Posts: 1,690
does shahadat have some relative in board? why shahadat!!
__________________
Bangladeshi...
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old January 2, 2010, 04:43 PM
Zeeshan's Avatar
Zeeshan Zeeshan is offline
Cricket Savant
  
Join Date: March 9, 2008
Location: Ω
Posts: 35,908
On a related news, Indian players' reaction:

__________________
Atman

Official Website |Amazon | Twitter/X | YouTube|Cricket Articles
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old January 2, 2010, 04:47 PM
rashed411 rashed411 is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: October 8, 2008
Location: Sylhet
Favorite Player: Tamim IK/Nasir Hossain
Posts: 1,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeeshanM
On a related news, Indian players' reaction:
ahahahah
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old January 2, 2010, 04:57 PM
HereWeGo HereWeGo is offline
Cricket Legend
  
Join Date: March 7, 2006
Posts: 2,395
Shahadat is a better bowler than Dollar any day....
I would have actually gone for Shuvasish over Shahadat / robin/dollar any given day....


Since Shuvasish was not even on the 26 men, I would have acually gone for Kapali...
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old January 2, 2010, 06:02 PM
mij mij is offline
Cricket Legend
  
Join Date: September 21, 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereWeGo
Shahadat is a better bowler than Dollar any day....
I would have actually gone for Shuvasish over Shahadat / robin/dollar any given day....


Since Shuvasish was not even on the 26 men, I would have acually gone for Kapali...
What its got to do with Kapali you do know Shahadat and Kapali is 2 diiferent type of player.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old January 3, 2010, 12:45 AM
dark mage dark mage is offline
ODI Cricketer
  
Join Date: July 22, 2009
Posts: 734
It would've been better to bring back Tapash Bayisha....atleast he wont be as bad as Shahadat
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old January 3, 2010, 01:57 AM
wiseshah wiseshah is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: June 18, 2005
Location: newyork
Favorite Player: Ryder,Tamim,shakib,warner
Posts: 6,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereWeGo
Shahadat is a better bowler than Dollar any day....
I would have actually gone for Shuvasish over Shahadat / robin/dollar any given day....


Since Shuvasish was not even on the 26 men, I would have acually gone for Kapali...

totally make sense. i agree 100%
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old January 3, 2010, 02:00 AM
$hamrat $hamrat is offline
Street Cricketer
  
Join Date: December 31, 2009
Location: DHAKA,BD
Favorite Player: shakib al hasan HELL YA
Posts: 24
=_= wat has shahdat done to deserve a spot in da squad? i thot i saw a 6+ economy rate in da domestic league, yo dis really bummed me out.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old January 3, 2010, 02:01 AM
wiseshah wiseshah is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: June 18, 2005
Location: newyork
Favorite Player: Ryder,Tamim,shakib,warner
Posts: 6,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by mij
What its got to do with Kapali you do know Shahadat and Kapali is 2 diiferent type of player.

atleast we wud know that shahadat wont feature in main XI.

should be only 2 pacer,due to najmul's injury. hope pace pair should be

1.rasel-shafiul
2.rasel-rubel
3.shafiul-rubel

worst case scenario----
rubel--shahadat

i dont think najmul's injury is that serious, they should have waited for his recovery or delay the name

atleast we could have think about mashrafe's fitness, or adding another new pacer like subhashis roy or ex pacer--tareq aziz/talha

in ODI,any one could have been better than shahadat
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 PM.

BanglaCricket.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket