? - Page 9

Rubu · #**201** March 29, 2005, 11:23 PM

:heart :

:flag :

:fl ag:

:flag :

:heart :

bdmoderator · #**202** March 29, 2005, 11:29 PM

#~@!*&^#%$!@#$%%^

bdmoderator · #**203** March 29, 2005, 11:30 PM

Great Work Agent Smith. It showing BC with you Emotics. Truly great work.

Hasib · #**204** March 30, 2005, 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by faceoff
?

oi!!! u stealing Chinaman's ideas?!!!!!

Mr-khan · #**205** March 30, 2005, 04:41 AM

RazabQ · #**206** March 30, 2005, 04:55 AM

it has just dawned me that it's very easy to determine who enjoys some for of nuptial bliss, just by observing the timing at posts. Case in point - me. In the last month the wife & kid have been away, this is what I find myself doing at 1:54 PT to stave off boredom.

Certain other posters on Powers of Mind thread also come to mind - I strongly suspect at least 3 of them are quite single

bourny3 · #**207** March 30, 2005, 05:46 AM

I have an idea!!!!!

*AsifTheManRahman* · #**208** March 30, 2005, 10:14 AM

me too!

BioMEMS · #**209** March 30, 2005, 12:36 PM

:embaressed:

Faceoff · #**210** March 30, 2005, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hasib

Quote:

Originally posted by faceoff
?

oi!!! u stealing Chinaman's ideas?!!!!!

Its not an idea, its an expression buddy and the meaning is pretty self explanatory. isnt it?

Arnab · #**211** March 30, 2005, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by razabq
I strongly suspect at least 3 of them are quite single

What is this "quite" single as opposed to "not-so-quite" single?

It's pretty well-known that most if not all progressive achievements of human history have been performed by single/unattached human males, not women nor the listless husbands who are mainly sexless androids.

Edited on, March 31, 2005, 3:35 AM GMT, by Arnab.

**Zunaid** · #**212** March 30, 2005, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Arnab

Quote:

Originally posted by razabq
I strongly suspect at least 3 of them are quite single

What is this "quite" single as opposed to "not-so-quite" single?

It's pretty well-known that most if not all progressive achievements of human history have been performed by single/unattached human males, not women nor the listless husbands who are mainly sexless androids.

Edited on, March 31, 2005, 3:35 AM GMT, by Arnab.

speak for yourself; you haven't found the right woman to elevate your intellectual prowess to such an extent that you find all other humans to be beneath you.

Arnab · #**213** March 30, 2005, 11:18 PM

I am aware that "finding the right woman" is the ultimate gauge of accomplishment in a man's life.

Orpheus · #**214** March 30, 2005, 11:25 PM

Most intellectual men are gay.

Well atleast quiet a few are - perhaps there is a correlation.

Simulation · #**215** March 30, 2005, 11:41 PM

Team Nazmul 4/86 (Trail by 347)
Aka 4
Jubaitca 4
Sakin 21
Tintin 28
Oracle 14*
Rana 0*

Naheyan 1/0

And thats Tea with Team Nazmul in deep trouble. The question is, will they avoid the follow on? Im leaving the commentry box and after the Tea Intervel, James will take take over the mic.

Arnab · #**216** March 30, 2005, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Orpheus
Most intellectual men are gay.

Well atleast quiet a few are - perhaps there is a correlation.

Actually there have been a lot of "celibate-for-life" famous intellectual men in history.

There also have been a lot of intellectual seducers as well.

There are all kinds of people in the world. But there's an interesting quote that holds true for all of them, and interestingly it's by the wife of a man whose single-man-like work ethic is legendary:

"Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people". - Eleanor Roosevelt.

Franklin D Roosevelt was probably the most exuberant person in America at his time. What he accomplished with his relentless enthusiasm can seem outlandish now.

Arnab · #**217** March 30, 2005, 11:51 PM

james?

Orpheus · #**218** March 30, 2005, 11:53 PM

in response to simulation. lemme read your post

RazabQ · #**219** March 31, 2005, 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Arnab
There are all kinds of people in the world. But there's an interesting quote that holds true for all of them, and interestingly it's by the wife of a man whose single-man-like work ethic is legendary:

"Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people". - Eleanor Roosevelt.

Franklin D Roosevelt was probably the most exuberant person in America at his time. What he accomplished with his relentless enthusiasm can seem outlandish now.

Franklin bechara was forced to be celibate on account of his wife being a lesbian. I suspect Eleanor said that because people were gossiping about her.

Also, I reject the implicit condition that greatness is about discussing ideas. That's a very non-humanist way of looking at things. I would argue that someone who truly gets humanity, can discuss people with insight, and is able to use his/her empathy to make notable accomplishments happen is just as great a mind. E.g. Gandhi was known for his ability to remember little details about people, for his ability in "aaapon kore neya". It is this attribute of his that enabled him to get others to join his ahimsa andolong and we all know the result. If I remember, aside from non-violence, Gandhi was never wed to any specific political ideology. In fact the British often complained that he changed positions so quickly.

Arnab · #**220** March 31, 2005, 12:46 AM

I guess we have learnt a lesson here: lesbians utter great quotes when they are being gossiped and they are true.

James90 · #**221** March 31, 2005, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Simulation
Team Nazmul 4/86 (Trail by 347)
Aka 4
Jubaitca 4
Sakin 21
Tintin 28
Oracle 14*
Rana 0*

Naheyan 1/0

And thats Tea with Team Nazmul in deep trouble. The question is, will they avoid the follow on? Im leaving the commentry box and after the Tea Intervel, James will take take over the mic.

Hasib!!! I think that's what happened to your tea post.
I expect your resignation on my desk by lunch, just kidding mate we're not all perfect

James90 · #**222** March 31, 2005, 07:43 PM

Can you overdose on chocolate? I haven't felt right since Easter

RazabQ · #**223** March 31, 2005, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Habibul_fan
Can you overdose on chocolate? I haven't felt right since Easter

There is an implication here that whatever you flelt before Easter was Right!

Do we dare make that assumption? heh heh

To answer your question tho - if you can overdose on sex, should be the same with chocolate. Don't both generate essentially the same chemical reaction?

Orpheus · #**224** April 1, 2005, 12:24 AM

Really? I thought one induces sleep and the other reduces it. Anyways, I wouldn't know - maybe you can tell me or ask your wife.

I also think the discussion on this line is improper for this forum's G-rating environment. I think hfan is the sole reason why we aspire to keep it clean but I bet he is the nautiest one here. He wants to teach girls how to hold a bat and ball. hmmm

Edited on, April 1, 2005, 5:25 AM GMT, by Orpheus.

James90 · #**225** April 1, 2005, 04:30 AM

I'm 15, why would the forum need a G-rating?