Match Thread: Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe,1st ODI, February 4, 2007 - Page 11

omi rahman pial · #**251** February 4, 2007, 06:35 AM

im the one working with it buddy
in bdnews24.com
updating at a time for u guys
50 overs 260/9

Sumon77 · #**252** February 4, 2007, 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miraz
OH!! No,

Collapse at the end. That's silly.

Anyway, it's a good score, IMO.

ya, should be more than enough to relax(for fans, not for the players

)

yaseer · #**253** February 4, 2007, 06:41 AM

anyone know the score card?

omi rahman pial · #**254** February 4, 2007, 06:42 AM

indeed buddy its from www.bdnews24.com
guess who's ticking the ticker

sar2005 · #**255** February 4, 2007, 06:47 AM

south africar Last 5 ovs 85/2 RR 17.00 agains pakis
BD 22/5 agains zim

fwullah · #**256** February 4, 2007, 06:47 AM

Loss of wickets in the end proves the point that perhaps some of our players are taking this series pretty lightly.

cricket_king · #**257** February 4, 2007, 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cricket
Last 3 overs 12 run and lost 4 wickets

disappointing considering the start we had and the position we were in towards the final overs.

Sam · #**258** February 4, 2007, 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by omi rahman pial
im the one working with it buddy
in bdnews24.com
updating at a time for u guys
50 overs 260/9

Thanks Omi. That means you are from bdnews24.com. It's great.

Sam · #**259** February 4, 2007, 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fwullah
Loss of wickets in the end proves the point that perhaps some of our players are taking this series pretty lightly.

I think, they went for risky slogs as they had many wickets in hand. That's OK for the "Endschpiel"

Sam · #**260** February 4, 2007, 07:01 AM

Update - Bangladesh 260 for 9 (50 overs, Bashar 78, Saqibul Hassan 61)

Put into bat by the Prosper Utseya at the picturesque Harare Sports Club ground, Bashar and Fakib al Hassan put on 105 for the fourth wicket, says an AFP report.

"Bashar, who began cautiously, scored his runs off 87 balls and struck seven fours to record his 13th half-century. He was dropped when on 70 by bowler Gary Brent. Al Hassan's half century was his second and it came off 74 balls with six fours

"Bangladesh began steadily with their first three wickets falling for 93 at a run-rate of just under five an over, leaving the innings in the balance. Zimbabwe's fielding was sharp but their bowling none too accurate. Only about 500 spectators were at the ground with Zimbabweans showing very little interest in cricket despite 14 years with official Test status."

Cricinfo

billah · #**261** February 4, 2007, 07:06 AM

Cricinfo's calling Sakib "fakib"..

Some report, with political editorial comments as bonus...serving her majesty's interest..
Says "Zimbabweans showing very little interest despite 14 years with test status...". Conveniently forgets to mention that for the most part, its the occupying englishmen that played cricket there. The real Zimbabweans have just begun playing, and they should be given at least half a century to come up...to be fair.

fwullah · #**262** February 4, 2007, 07:07 AM

Shouldn't the Zimbabwe innings start by now?

Carte Blanche · #**263** February 4, 2007, 07:12 AM

Yeah it should. No updates yet though. Btw, wb fw.

series · #**264** February 4, 2007, 07:13 AM

saqib looks good :joy

PoorFan · #**265** February 4, 2007, 07:14 AM

Hmm ... seems Mehrab jnr, Ash & Mushi failed today.

PoorFan · #**266** February 4, 2007, 07:19 AM

260 is not bad, but I was expecting 20 runs more. Let see how ZIM bat on this pitch against our bowling.

Carte Blanche · #**267** February 4, 2007, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PoorFan
Hmm ... seems Mehrab jnr, Ash & Mushi failed today.

Nothing new.

Miraz · #**268** February 4, 2007, 07:20 AM

Every cricket site has got least interest in this series. No thread is opened in many other cricket forums. Even at BC, this is the first match thread which is not sticky

BangladeshFan · #**269** February 4, 2007, 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fwullah
Loss of wickets in the end proves the point that perhaps some of our players are taking this series pretty lightly.

it may also prove our late or middle order cant use the long handle when it requires. But with Rafiq, mashrafi and mushfiq it shouldnt be the case. maybe Bd needs more firepower down there

Carte Blanche · #**270** February 4, 2007, 07:22 AM

Haha, stickied now.

It's not true that we don't have much of an interest in this game. It's been empty mostly because there has been no play-by-play coverage available.

PoorFan · #**271** February 4, 2007, 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carte Blanche
Nothing new.

I was showing bit generous to Ash though.

Navarene · #**272** February 4, 2007, 07:29 AM

Where is exactly Zimbabwe? In which galaxie/star/milky wave is it actually located? How could tigers reach there?...and if so, why on earth we dont get time to time latest updates???

FagunerAgun · #**273** February 4, 2007, 07:31 AM

260 is good for BD against Zimbos...they can't score more than 220.
Ashraful failed again, he is a liablity for BD team, only good in domestic cricket.
Tamim Iqbal should be playing in his place.

Rabz · #**274** February 4, 2007, 07:32 AM

oh..just logged in..and checking the scores...
260 doesnt sound bad against the Zims.. but then again.. i hear we lost few many wickets at the dying overs with minimal runs... thats not a good sign..

let's see how they respond...

Miraz · #**275** February 4, 2007, 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carte Blanche
Haha, stickied now.

Finally

Ok Folks, at least Banglacricket is serious about this series.