Shakib and Shahadat fined

**Mahmood** · #1 July 14, 2009, 08:11 AM

http://www.cricinfo.com/wivbdesh2009...ry/414425.html

Not repeating appeal but prolonged!!! Sounds injustice.

abz..+ · #2 July 14, 2009, 08:13 AM

oh noo

msher173 · #3 July 14, 2009, 08:14 AM

what the hell. this is unjust
If anybody I expected Mushfiqur Rahim to get fined

bujhee kom · #4 July 14, 2009, 08:17 AM

That's okay...we won!

abz..+ · #5 July 14, 2009, 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bujhee kom
That's okay...we won!

yh we won

shaad · #6 July 14, 2009, 08:31 AM

So, does Ashoka get fined for his miscalls?

BanCricFan · #7 July 14, 2009, 08:32 AM

A Shocka!

sadhat · #8 July 14, 2009, 08:35 AM

That's "Chanda" (fees) to ICC for winning the match. If you win the game, you have to give some money to godfather.

MarufH · #9 July 14, 2009, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sadhat
That's "Chanda" (fees) to ICC for winning the match. If you win the game, you have to give some money to godfather.

Hahahah.. funny!!!

Imteaz · #10 July 14, 2009, 08:39 AM

Please be careful for next time.

FagunerAgun · #11 July 14, 2009, 08:41 AM

What is about the bad umpiring, ICC?

Roni_uk · #12 July 14, 2009, 09:25 AM

This is just dictatorship. Why doesn't BCB fight back????

Obviously they were appealing because Ashoka was NOT doing his job correctly and the action replays did pick it up. If this was to India, Indian media would have ripped apart ICC match refree.

This is unacceptable. I WANT JUSTICE!!!!!!!!!

capslock · #13 July 14, 2009, 09:37 AM

If Ashoka were been fined for every bad call he would be bankrupt by now.

kalpurush · #14 July 14, 2009, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by capslock
If Ashoka were been fined for every bad call he would be bankrupt by now.

and his bank/country as well

One World · #15 July 14, 2009, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kalpurush
and his bank/country as well

FDIC insured?

jga · #16 July 14, 2009, 09:55 PM

Whether the LBWs were plumb/not plumb, umpiring was good/bad; why would you instantly fine players for prolonged appealing (Shahadat/Shakib) without a prior warning? I may be mistaken but I don't think they have been warned/fined before. Also, in saying that do any of you have any info of any other players in any other teams who have been fined for the same offence? (Genuine question)..

The more reasonable approach would have been to give them all a severe warning in that they would be fined in the next test match for prolonged appealing. It may be in the ICC code of conduct but an initial formal warning would have been a lot better. And if the umpires felt so much pressure during the match, why didn't they warn them then and there on the field during play?

PoorFan · #17 July 14, 2009, 10:15 PM

Well, this is also a learning process for our boys. Every time match rafree going to fine players on over appealing means, umpire's decision will come under watch too. So lets keep it up and let the world know how pathetic / biased Ashoka is.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jga
... why didn't they warn them then and there on the field during play?

They did.

Akib · #18 July 14, 2009, 09:37 AM

Uhhh....... what about Musfiq then...

The kid was appealing every ball...

FagunerAgun · #19 July 14, 2009, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akib
Uhhh....... what about Musfiq then...

The kid was appealing every ball...

beyond, his mouth was running like a 'compact machine gun'.

FagunerAgun · #20 July 14, 2009, 09:46 AM

the high lights shows how easily umpires missed several clean LBWs.
Is it a rocket science, ICC?
I am very worried about the umpiring in the next matches. Hopefully, ICC will change umpires successfully.

mahbubH · #21 July 14, 2009, 10:23 AM

don't mind paying some to ICC fund after winning the test

BanCricFan · #22 July 14, 2009, 11:28 AM

Damn! Shakib wont be able to order any curry from England now!

Thanks to A SHOCKA!

Kabir · #23 July 14, 2009, 11:32 AM

Well, umps get a call at whatever they want. Perhaps there may have been some khocha khochi due to bad umpiring decisions. From the highlights, I haven't seen any prolonged appeal...so perhaps the prolonged appeals was just another ojuhat for fining hhim.

Having said that, we should fine the ump for prolonged nonsense.

Ajfar · #24 July 14, 2009, 11:55 AM

mushy bachlo kemne?

Rabz · #25 July 14, 2009, 12:09 PM

Shahadat's appeal was justified.
That first wicket was as plumb as it gets. Lucky for us, the batsman decided to end his own misery.
There was a reason he was looking at the umpire to sign his death certificate and was wondering why the hell it was taking him this long to give him out.

Shahadat was clearly upset with the decision and rightly so. He missed out on a sure wicket.
Thats why he persisted with the appealing.

It was those persisent appeal that caused asoka to raise his fingers in our favour next few times when things werent as plumb with one decision we can consider ourselves lucky.

But who cares, we won!