Match Thread: Twenty20 International, Bangladesh vs. South Africa at Johannesburg, November 5, 2008 - Page 50

hoodlum · #**1226** November 5, 2008, 02:46 PM

so immaturity....

BANFAN · #**1227** November 5, 2008, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nadim 98
the match was about expreince vs inexperiance

Yes, we probably had more experience than them

golam · #**1228** November 5, 2008, 02:46 PM

We needed Nazim, Aftab, Alok

Nadim · #**1229** November 5, 2008, 02:47 PM

razzak should be man of the match

BanCricFan · #**1230** November 5, 2008, 02:47 PM

[quote=Rabz;773044]we lost the match by 12 runs...
snatched defeat from the jaw of victory....
ah..nothing new....

anyways...well played boys....[/quote]

Indeed! Who needs Aftab, Alok or Nazim!

Faisal · #**1231** November 5, 2008, 02:47 PM

we should have win this easily. if they did not throw their wicket at one point we need only 7 runs per over we had 8 wickets in hand!

bangla-red · #**1232** November 5, 2008, 02:47 PM

Louw to Shahadat Hossain, 1 run, Full and straight again. Punched to mid off who makes a good save and slamps the door shut for any late consolation boundaries. Well done South Africa winning this Pro20, the only of the tour, by 12 runs. Thank you for joining us for this game and please do so again for the rest of this series between South Africa and Bangladesh.

9 run or 12 run win?

tonoy · #**1233** November 5, 2008, 02:47 PM

GUys don't put so much emphasis on this match. SA will be atleast twice as powerful on the odi. These newbies wont be there. And you can surely expect fewer extras.

FagunerAgun · #**1234** November 5, 2008, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazabQ
Gang, I take more positives than -ves. We proved we can score off their faster bowlers when they hold it back of length. Most of our batters got an eye in. The team balance was off-kilter by Mash not in there. You'd reckon with him in instead of Shadat, Saffers score a few less and we know Mash would have tonked a few. At least we were competitive. Someone said it best. Since the last ODI in Aus we have been competitive in every limited over match we have played. Home and Away. Maybe Siddons is starting to get the consistency!

But mental lapeses off set this consistency.

Nadim · #**1235** November 5, 2008, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazabQ
Gang, I take more positives than -ves. We proved we can score off their faster bowlers when they hold it back of length. Most of our batters got an eye in. The team balance was off-kilter by Mash not in there. You'd reckon with him in instead of Shadat, Saffers score a few less and we know Mash would have tonked a few. At least we were competitive. Someone said it best. Since the last ODI in Aus we have been competitive in every limited over match we have played. Home and Away. Maybe Siddons is starting to get the consistency!

i agree bro.and i dont any icl player.......we got good enough player.......

kalpurush · #**1236** November 5, 2008, 02:48 PM

it was a good game after all....

Zeeshan · #**1237** November 5, 2008, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bangla-red
Louw to Shahadat Hossain, 1 run, Full and straight again. Punched to mid off who makes a good save and slamps the door shut for any late consolation boundaries. Well done South Africa winning this Pro20, the only of the tour, by 12 runs. Thank you for joining us for this game and please do so again for the rest of this series between South Africa and Bangladesh.

9 run or 12 run win?

they are right...it was 12 because of D/L method

hoodlum · #**1238** November 5, 2008, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nadim 98
could u plz stop talking about DW...........

its the truth...i saw u bashing DW in the other threads..u have to accept the truth

hoodlum · #**1239** November 5, 2008, 02:50 PM

steyn,morkel was bowling like 145kph with good bounce at regular intervals...my god i dont know wats waiting for us in da odis and tests...

BanCricFan · #**1240** November 5, 2008, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazabQ
Gang, I take more positives than -ves. We proved we can score off their faster bowlers when they hold it back of length. Most of our batters got an eye in. The team balance was off-kilter by Mash not in there. You'd reckon with him in instead of Shadat, Saffers score a few less and we know Mash would have tonked a few. At least we were competitive. Someone said it best. Since the last ODI in Aus we have been competitive in every limited over match we have played. Home and Away. Maybe Siddons is starting to get the consistency!

Aha. We have so much surplus of positives...we can afford to give away some to SA and still win.

taklima_naj · #**1241** November 5, 2008, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golam
We needed Nazim, Aftab, Alok

of course we needed, but they dont prefer us,so there is no benefit talking of them. but i dont understand selectors why mehrab at 8 playing 20 20

Nadim · #**1242** November 5, 2008, 02:52 PM

[QUOTE=hoodlum;773079]its the truth...i saw u bashing DW in the other threads..u have to accept the truth[/QUOT

whatever

cricman · #**1243** November 5, 2008, 02:52 PM

Who choses Mehrab Hossian jr to play a 20/20?

hoodlum · #**1244** November 5, 2008, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by taklima_naj
of course we needed, but they dont prefer us,so there is no benefit talking of them. but i dont understand selectors why mehrab at 8 playing 20 20

Imrul could have been a good choice than mehrab...shithead selectors

Nadim · #**1245** November 5, 2008, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoodlum
steyn,morkel was bowling like 145kph at regular intervals...my god i dont know wats waiting for us in da odis and tests...

thats the different between icl and intenational cricket...what did aftab,alok and nazim did in international lavel.pplz tell me

kalpurush · #**1246** November 5, 2008, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazabQ
Gang, I take more positives than -ves. We proved we can score off their faster bowlers when they hold it back of length. Most of our batters got an eye in. The team balance was off-kilter by Mash not in there. You'd reckon with him in instead of Shadat, Saffers score a few less and we know Mash would have tonked a few. At least we were competitive. Someone said it best. Since the last ODI in Aus we have been competitive in every limited over match we have played. Home and Away. Maybe Siddons is starting to get the consistency!

ditto...
The ODI series would be tough but interesting I believe.
All we have to do is play with bat and head...never know what could be the outcome...!

tonoy · #**1247** November 5, 2008, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nadim 98
thats the different between icl and intenational cricket...what did aftab,alok and nazim did in international lavel.pplz tell me

Don't be such an idiot and look at the highlights of how aftab helped us chase 160+ against the west indies.

Megh · #**1248** November 5, 2008, 02:54 PM

the positive thing is that they are taking us really seriously....and Razzaq bowled really well and got MOM.btw Razzaq's english pretty good.nice

Megh · #**1249** November 5, 2008, 02:55 PM

specially Razzaq did really great on a bounce pitch. that's a inspiration.

Nadim · #**1250** November 5, 2008, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonoy
Don't be such an idiot and look at the highlights of how aftab helped us chase 160+ against the west indies.

only 1 match.but ash did better than aftab on that match