|
Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket
|
April 23, 2004, 06:27 PM
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: January 22, 2004
Posts: 22,100
|
|
Default Whatmore SWOTs, "mba", reina and Gartner Magic Quadrant
Reinausagi's comment about Whatmore and SWOT analysis in the WI player's thread and all the discussion about our new "mba" punch-bag, I thought - "what if we did a business style analysis of our players?"
So, I spent a few miniutes applying the [in]famous Gartner Magic Quadrant analysis. The axes hardly needed to be changed. The X-axis sort of maps to class or style.
Some example:
Sujon: Neither much style not tremendous ability to execute. (sorry)
Ashraful: Lot sof class and style, but have not shown a consistent ability to execute
Pilot: Not too much cstyle but he has performed and has shown he can execute.
I just placed the players on the quadrant with very little throught. I'm sure I will revise them if I spend more than the 5 photoshop minutes.
- Z
[Edited on 23-4-2004 by Zunaid]
[Edited on 24-4-2004 by Zunaid : Ashraful Islam?]
Last edited by Zunaid; January 20, 2007 at 05:21 PM..
|
April 23, 2004, 06:38 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: February 15, 2004
Location: Michigan
Favorite Player: Mashrafee Mortaza
Posts: 8,361
|
|
i'm kinda confused about mushfiq's position. i'd thought he has ability to execute.
|
April 23, 2004, 07:08 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: July 25, 2002
Favorite Player: Tamim, Riyad, Ashraful
Posts: 5,835
|
|
who is Ashraful Islam?
I thought his fulll name was Mohammad Ashraful.
Zunaid, as much as you reminded us - it took you only a "little" time to do this....you aint gonna be excused from this:
you have too much time on your hand!
[Edited on 24-4-2004 by Orpheus]
|
April 23, 2004, 07:46 PM
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: January 22, 2004
Posts: 22,100
|
|
bah humbug
ashraful islam is the little known nickname for Ashraful
He is Mohammad Ashraful "Ashraful Islam"
What was I thinking?
|
April 23, 2004, 07:52 PM
|
|
Super Moderator BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678
|
|
that was an eye catcher...
|
April 23, 2004, 08:30 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: June 30, 2003
Posts: 1,476
|
|
I still don't think Bashar has great leadership qualities. I think he needs to prove himself on that front.
|
April 23, 2004, 09:01 PM
|
|
Super Moderator BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678
|
|
yo Dr. Z
i think u should've put in a couple of other guys there...like a pHD holder or something...
|
April 23, 2004, 09:40 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: February 15, 2004
Location: Michigan
Favorite Player: Mashrafee Mortaza
Posts: 8,361
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by AsifTheManRahman
yo Dr. Z
i think u should've put in a couple of other guys there...like a pHD holder or something...
|
finally we've found another sujon. this time is mba. i mean sujon used to be our only punch bag. now we've this poor guy. leave him alone.
|
April 23, 2004, 11:28 PM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: September 22, 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,394
|
|
zunaid, I think you're giving too much credit to our players! I would only place two of them - rafique and mashud - anywhere near quadrant 4!
|
April 24, 2004, 12:41 AM
|
|
First BC Member
|
|
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: A successful cricketer
Posts: 6,545
|
|
'Gartner' is the name of the genius who created the 4 quadrants? Didn't know that, thanks.
|
April 24, 2004, 01:23 AM
|
|
Chief Moderator
|
|
Join Date: August 22, 2003
Favorite Player: Shakib Al Hasan
Posts: 5,942
|
|
Gartner's Magic Quadrant is a graphical representation of a marketplace at and for a specific time period. It depicts Gartner's analysis of how certain vendors measure against criteria for that marketplace, as defined by Gartner. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in the Magic Quadrant, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors placed in the "Leaders" quadrant. Gartner Magic Quadrant is intended solely as a research tool.This is
very influential when IT management evaluates potential vendors and considers technology purchasing decisions
According to Gartner, vendors listed as Leaders are doing well and have great prospects for the future. They have a long-term vision for high-availability services, coupled with service offerings, expertise and methodologies to fulfill that vision.
-internet
[Edited on 24-4-2004 by rezwan1977]
|
April 24, 2004, 08:28 AM
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: January 22, 2004
Posts: 22,100
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by fwullah
'Gartner' is the name of the genius who created the 4 quadrants? Didn't know that, thanks.
|
A bit off topic but ...
The Gartner Group is one of the leading information and technology resreach and analyst firms (hmm.. that sounds like I am shilling for them.. I am not). They focus on the information and technology industry.
Similar other firms include Giga, Forrester, Aberdeen, Yankee Group etc..
These firms do several things:
1. Write research reports on and analyzes that drive business and organizational success
2. Provides strategy and business conultation services like MckInsey and others
3. Measures and reports onn industry benchmarks
etc..
The Gartner Magic Quadrant has become a very sucessful "summary" report on a particular industry sector. Companies try to out their position in the quadrant as a marketing ploy. I believe they have even tried to "patent" the quadrant - the axes and the interpretations. Businesses do use the magic quadrant to get a quick market and competitive landscape view.
|
January 20, 2007, 04:40 PM
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: January 22, 2004
Posts: 22,100
|
|
Ok. Feint.
I thought I would re-incarnate this old thread with a new chart.
Do note how old players have moved and where new players are showing up.
|
January 20, 2007, 05:05 PM
|
|
BC Staff BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Mohammad Rafique
Posts: 15,768
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zunaid
Ok. Feint.
Do note how old players have moved and where new players are showing up.
|
Good analysis Zunaid bhai. I suppose Ashraful is making some slow movement towards the right corner
Wanted to compare with the old chart but couldn't see it in your first post
|
January 20, 2007, 05:13 PM
|
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: September 3, 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Favorite Player: Sakib - the real Tiger
Posts: 11,194
|
|
Here it is, both the graphs. One, before my birth. And one, after my birth.
2004 version.
2007 version.
__________________
cricket is a PROCESS, not an EVENT or two. -- Sohel_NR
Fans need to stop DUI (Dreaming Under Influence)!
Last edited by Zunaid; January 20, 2007 at 05:22 PM..
Reason: Miraz - see the image now?
|
January 20, 2007, 05:14 PM
|
|
BC Staff BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Mohammad Rafique
Posts: 15,768
|
|
My bad, still can't see 2004 version except a big red cross
|
January 20, 2007, 05:19 PM
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: January 22, 2004
Posts: 22,100
|
|
Hmm. I could see the image in my first post. But, anywhoo...
Pilot has dropped vertically down.
Hannan Sarker, Sahariar Hossain, Faisal Hossain no longer in the charts.
The only reason Rana is not on the new chart is to tease Rubu.
Nafees appears out of nowhere to hold prime real-estate.
Ash has moved higher on ability to execute but lower in the visionary scale.
Rafique is still where he was. Man, what a testament to this man. But we have two bowlers Masri and Razzak around him.
Shahadat does not hold hallowed ground.
Rajin Saleh has dropped his position. Is it because I do not see him anymore or is it because in relation to the new folks he is where he should belong.
I did not put a lot of the performers - not because they are not on my radar but because I could not fit them in.
|
January 20, 2007, 05:22 PM
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: January 22, 2004
Posts: 22,100
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miraz
My bad, still can't see 2004 version except a big red cross
|
How about now?
|
January 20, 2007, 05:25 PM
|
|
BC Staff BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Mohammad Rafique
Posts: 15,768
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zunaid
How about now?
|
I can see it!!
I can see it!!
Thanks Zunaid bhai.
|
January 20, 2007, 05:30 PM
|
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: September 3, 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Favorite Player: Sakib - the real Tiger
Posts: 11,194
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miraz
My bad, still can't see 2004 version except a big red cross
|
The image is here. http://www.virtualbangladesh.com/ban...ket/magick.gif
If everything fails, it's time to ...
__________________
cricket is a PROCESS, not an EVENT or two. -- Sohel_NR
Fans need to stop DUI (Dreaming Under Influence)!
|
January 20, 2007, 05:30 PM
|
|
Super Moderator BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678
|
|
wonder where reina is these days
__________________
Screw the IPL, I'm going to the MLC!
|
January 20, 2007, 05:32 PM
|
|
BC Staff BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Mohammad Rafique
Posts: 15,768
|
|
Zunaid bhai, is your chart representing ODI only?
Otherwise, you are way too harsh on Habibul Bashar, he is the highest test run scorer in 2005 and second highest in 2006 (just 6 run short of SN).
I will recommend Shahadat hossain within the upper right square.
|
January 20, 2007, 05:35 PM
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: January 22, 2004
Posts: 22,100
|
|
ODI only.
Just my not so humble opinion. The masses can weigh in now
|
January 20, 2007, 05:39 PM
|
|
BC Staff BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Mohammad Rafique
Posts: 15,768
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zunaid
ODI only.
Just my not so humble opinion. The masses can weigh in now
|
In that case, quite amazed to see the position of HB in 2004.
Here's Habibul Bashar's 2004 performance for your kind perusal
Mat Runs HS BatAv 100 50 W BB BowlAv 5w Ct St
16 266 65 16.62 0 2 - - - - 4 0
|
January 20, 2007, 05:43 PM
|
|
BC Staff BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Mohammad Rafique
Posts: 15,768
|
|
In case you refer to 2003 performance,
Here's another data for the same
Mat Runs HS BatAv 100 50 W BB BowlAv 5w Ct St
15 228 50 15.20 0 1 - - - - 1 0
And here's 2006 performance
Mat Runs HS BatAv 100 50 W BB BowlAv 5w Ct St
22 461 70 30.73 0 3 - - - - 8 0
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 AM.
|
|