|
Match Archive Relive the match-time passion (Read Only) |
June 21, 2005, 03:49 PM
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: March 5, 2005
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 713
|
|
4444444444444444444444444444444
GooooooOOOOO Rafiq
|
June 21, 2005, 03:50 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: February 27, 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Favorite Player: Graeme Smith
Posts: 5,856
|
|
Ok people ..... 33 runs per over.... Seems do able...
/\ /\ /\
| | |
I am being sarcastic.
|
June 21, 2005, 03:51 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: May 28, 2004
Location: TN, USA
Posts: 3,299
|
|
169 runs needed in 5 overs.
It is still theoritically possible to win !!!
5 Overs 30 balls--6 in each ball and we will win !!!!!!!!
|
June 21, 2005, 03:51 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 18,718
|
|
Anything is doable (33 RR) with some no Balls and wides.
|
June 21, 2005, 03:51 PM
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: March 5, 2005
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 713
|
|
Rafiq GONE
|
June 21, 2005, 03:52 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend Fantasy Winner: BD v NZ 2008
|
|
Join Date: December 17, 2004
Posts: 7,713
|
|
It's all over
|
June 21, 2005, 03:52 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 18,718
|
|
Gone... shesh.... Khel Khotom.... Poisha Ta Hozom Hoilon aee Ja.
|
June 21, 2005, 03:53 PM
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: November 1, 2004
Location: Gorgeous Bay Area
Posts: 537
|
|
all over. BD could not get to 250. oh boy!
|
June 21, 2005, 03:55 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: February 27, 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Favorite Player: Graeme Smith
Posts: 5,856
|
|
I was hoping for BD to get to 250 or even 300 but batting under lights was tough.....
The lost toss really hurt us..... I would hav rather lost by 10 wickets than getting our bowlers hammered for 391.
|
June 21, 2005, 03:55 PM
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: May 11, 2005
Posts: 948
|
|
Koto
|
June 21, 2005, 03:58 PM
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: May 11, 2005
Posts: 948
|
|
jak tobuo valo 200 run a tow harayni, ki bolayn.
|
June 21, 2005, 03:58 PM
|
|
Super Moderator BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678
|
|
pretty ordinary and disappointing end.
|
June 21, 2005, 04:01 PM
|
|
BanglaCricket Staff BC Design Team
|
|
Join Date: January 1, 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Favorite Player: Shahriar Biddyut
Posts: 4,330
|
|
|
June 21, 2005, 04:06 PM
|
|
Moderator BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 25, 2004
Location: Fremont CA
Posts: 11,902
|
|
Well this loss further proves that England are the form team. I mean their treatment of our bowling was outright disdainful! I think the time has come for Tapash to go on a vacation and Rana to come in. Shahriar deserves one more chance - provided he cuts down on the fishing ...
|
June 21, 2005, 04:16 PM
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: March 5, 2005
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 713
|
|
Overall, it was not a bad game by our team.
WE DID MUCH BETTER THAN THE LAST ONE.
We managed to put a brake on England but Tapash gave it all away
We made 173 for 3 and then gave 6 wkts for only 20 runs.
However, this is better than the first ODI.
Fllod Light -e chokhe dhandha laiga gechilo -aarki!
|
June 21, 2005, 04:51 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: February 27, 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Favorite Player: Graeme Smith
Posts: 5,856
|
|
Well our batting is anyway.... Not our bowling..... I doubt England would have got 391 in the first match.
|
June 21, 2005, 04:53 PM
|
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 4, 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,392
|
|
Three ducks to a part time bowler! That is shamefull.
|
June 21, 2005, 05:13 PM
|
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: Air Force 1
Posts: 1,303
|
|
|
June 21, 2005, 05:15 PM
|
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: Air Force 1
Posts: 1,303
|
|
to hell with tapash.....
he drops the ball, gives no ball as if he came straight from high school to play for national team
|
June 21, 2005, 06:16 PM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: April 20, 2005
Posts: 4,782
|
|
This is the beauty of a win, even after such a bad loss our team can steal hope for another upset.
But, surprisingly, Taposh or Nazmul did not work on their bowling discipline even after they got smashesd by Aussie middle order. I guess complecency of the win also made the team management overlook it.
|
June 22, 2005, 12:11 AM
|
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: Air Force 1
Posts: 1,303
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TheWatcher
This is the beauty of a win, even after such a bad loss our team can steal hope for another upset.
But, surprisingly, Taposh or Nazmul did not work on their bowling discipline even after they got smashesd by Aussie middle order. I guess complecency of the win also made the team management overlook it.
|
its actually the beauty of inconsistency.....
a massive win followed by a massive defeat......
our players are always good at balancing victory with defeat.....
|
June 22, 2005, 01:31 AM
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: June 4, 2004
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 655
|
|
Shahriar Nafees was so shaky...too many misses at the off; and eventually bowled by the 6'7" debutant. He did not show any kind of confidence.
Ashraful should calm down a little bit when a new bowler came to bowl. He had good eye on the ball but missed the slower one.
Tapash was very pitiful. He pulled away all the pressure Mashrafe created on the English opener. What's wrong was in Tapash? He gave away too many no balls and warned by umpires. Selectors should think about him. Rana will not do worser than tapash for sure....
though Nazmul took 3 wickets including the stupid Vauhgn, he was not impresive; He was just lucky as Tapash was in the last gave against Autralia.
Tushar and Aftab was total mess. why they needed to be go pair? Just ridiculous batting. I hope they will be back in the next game against Australia.
And last thing. Habibul should phone to Pagla Baba of Pabla or Sylhet or whatever-place to have some doa to WIN the toss. How could he loss all the toss (excluding the practice matches)? He just proved the probability theory wrong...shhh
Edited on, June 22, 2005, 6:33 AM GMT, by little_master.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 AM.
|
|