facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 18, 2015, 02:39 AM
Yasin.'s Avatar
Yasin. Yasin. is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 8, 2006
Location: I-I 0 I\/I 3
Posts: 1,252
Default Bangladesh Batting Line Up

Tamim
Anamul
Soumya
Mahmudullah

Top 4 batsmen of our batting line up today. Continue with this batting line up and we will continue to reach 100 odd in first 25 overs. One of Shakib or Mushy needs to be there in the top 4, if not both. If a good start is achieved there is no reason why Mushy can't be sent as an one down batsman to be followed by Shakib. Instead half the innings went by, while two of the best batsmen in the team were warming benches.

There is a reason other teams play some of their best batsmen in number 3 and 4 positions. So far, regardless of whether the players were successful or not, you place your best batsmen to play majority of the overs.

NZ used Williamson and Taylor, Sri Lanka used Sanga and Jayawardene, Australia used Watson and Smith, England used Root and Ballance, South Africa used Du Plessis and AB Devilliers, India used Kohli and Raina, Pakistan used Hasris Sohail and Misbah even Zimbabwe used Masakadza and aylor, their best batsmen... but the genius that we are, the amazing team management that we have.... we have to use an unproven newcomer, and a decent batsman who never manages to set the stage alight, but just survives somehow.

We might go on to win this match, but this is disappointing. Your best batsmen need to get you the big runs, the hundreds..and this can be done when they play a whole lot of overs. Not when half the inning has gone by and they are in pressure to consolidate and to try to increase the run rate too.
__________________
"Tufnell! Can I borrow your brain? I'm building an idiot" - Australian fan to England spinner Phil Tufnell
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old February 18, 2015, 03:09 AM
BANFAN's Avatar
BANFAN BANFAN is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: March 26, 2007
Favorite Player: Bangladesh Team
Posts: 18,761

Flop Four Today, unfortunately

Just Excuse Soumyo, may be...
__________________
[Post CWC19 Consistency Record: [B]Test: W-0 L-0 D-0/B]// ODI: W-0 L-3 // T20: W-0 L-0]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 18, 2015, 03:43 AM
Max100's Avatar
Max100 Max100 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 12, 2012
Location: Queens,NYC
Favorite Player: Miler/warner/Ryder/maxweL
Posts: 2,891

i have doubt about sabbir. i think he is hit n miss. nasir could have been better. why mominul at #8. its puzzling
__________________
My ODI Team:Rohit,Warner,Ken Williamson,Root,Shakib,Stokes,Butler, starc, Archer,Bumrah,Chahal/santner
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old February 18, 2015, 06:32 AM
Out_You_Go's Avatar
Out_You_Go Out_You_Go is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: October 3, 2011
Location: Earth!
Favorite Player: Tamim, Shakib
Posts: 603

Ok, this is my analysis of Mominul's position today.

At first, lets understand that Mominul hasnt done much well at 3.

From what I understand, Hathuri probably wanted to try him after Shakib-Mushy. He wasnt sent in because that pair recovered the team and when we got going..sent in the hitter (Shabbir/Mash) to follow up with the run rate.
Had not that happened and one of Shakib-Mushy would have been out earlier, then Mominul would have been sent in to "consolidate" the innings (how much ever he could have) whereas the other went after the bowling.

This is probably the only thing that comes to my head. However, I can be wrong. But such experimentation wont work against Aussies. We need too have a clear order in mind.
__________________
Believe in Allah & have faith in your abilities - success then is a consequence..not an incident.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old February 18, 2015, 06:41 AM
NoName's Avatar
NoName NoName is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: April 9, 2011
Location: Sauga
Posts: 10,326

Top order is a complete mess, our lower order failed too ( could have gotten 280ish). Thank god for Shakib and Mushfiq for saving our a**. Don't think we'll ever see a match-winning performance from Tamim in LOIs again and Anamul is just.... Sarkar did alright, as he tried to pick up the score, Riyad was vintage Riyad and Shabbir was extremely disappointing. Mominul just seemed to there to fill a spot
__________________
"How the little piglets would grunt if they knew how the old boar suffered."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old February 18, 2015, 06:45 AM
BengaliPagol's Avatar
BengaliPagol BengaliPagol is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 4, 2012
Location: Meherpur, Kushtia
Favorite Player: Imrul "The Don" Kayes
Posts: 7,584

1. Tamim
2. Soumya
3. Mominul
4. Riyad
5. Shakib
6. Mushfiqur
7. Nasir
8. Shabbir
9. Mashrafe
10. Rubel
11. Taskin
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old February 18, 2015, 07:02 AM
ahnaf's Avatar
ahnaf ahnaf is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 31, 2010
Location: Dhaka,BD
Favorite Player: Tamim,Ash,Mash,Shakib
Posts: 5,153

Quote:
Originally Posted by BengaliPagol
1. Tamim
2. Soumya
3. Mominul
4. Mushfiqur
5. Shakib
6. Riyad
7. Nasir
8. Shabbir
9. Mashrafe
10. Rubel
11. Taskin
That would be my squad
__________________
আমার অপার সীমানাতে তোমার চিহ্ন তবু রবে বেঁচে ...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old February 18, 2015, 07:13 AM
Gowza Gowza is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273

Push mushy to 3, bat him higher so he bats more of the innings, then we'll see a 100+ score instead of a 70 score. I'd still keep riyad at 4 for now. Anamuls spot is really up in the air, soumya should possibly open with tamim instead of anamul. Nasir at 6, still go with sabbir at 7 because he can hit big better than nasir. However if only one of nasir or shabbir play I'd pick nasir at current. Riyad bowled really well, could almost count on him for 10 overs a match but the main question is whether it would give the bowling enough fire power to bowl out the better teams or do we need to pick another specialist bowler.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Kohli 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Miller 9 Procter 10 Marshall 11 Warne
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old February 18, 2015, 07:44 AM
BengaliPagol's Avatar
BengaliPagol BengaliPagol is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 4, 2012
Location: Meherpur, Kushtia
Favorite Player: Imrul "The Don" Kayes
Posts: 7,584

Id also would want mushfiqur at no. 3 but it just will not happen at this point in time
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old February 18, 2015, 08:10 AM
Yasin.'s Avatar
Yasin. Yasin. is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 8, 2006
Location: I-I 0 I\/I 3
Posts: 1,252

I know this won't happen but I had go with:
Tamim
Soumya
Mushfiqur/Mahmudullah
Mahmudullah/Mahmudullah
Shakib
Anamul
Nasir
Shabbir
Mashrafe
Rubel
Taskin/Al Amin

Anamul can hit big too. Give him the freedom to go after a bowling attack lower down the order perhaps... of course this won't happen but won't be too bad to see. He has hit 15 sixes in ODIs while Nasir [who always comes in the death overs when quick runs are required] and Mominul and Sabbir together has a grand total of 16 sixes.
__________________
"Tufnell! Can I borrow your brain? I'm building an idiot" - Australian fan to England spinner Phil Tufnell
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old February 18, 2015, 09:27 AM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 18,718

Quote:
Originally Posted by BengaliPagol
1. Tamim
2. Soumya
3. Mominul
4. Riyad
5. Shakib
6. Mushfiqur
7. Nasir
8. Shabbir
9. Mashrafe
10. Rubel
11. Taskin
I also like your 11. Only thing is I would demote Riyad further down like they used Mominul in the last game. I would like Mushfiq at #4. he will have the time to start slowly and then take the game to the next level.

I am not sure which Nasir we will get, but I am ok to try our luck with him. Anamul so far looked over hyped and not a complete player. His inability to take singles is painful to watch... he tales too many dot balls for my liking.... he also looks shaky as an opener.
__________________
"Make Bangladesh Cricket Great Again"
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old February 18, 2015, 12:06 PM
simon's Avatar
simon simon is offline
Cricket Savant
 
Join Date: February 20, 2008
Favorite Player: Tam,Sak,Nasa,Mash
Posts: 25,325

Quote:
Originally Posted by BengaliPagol
1. Tamim
2. Soumya
3. Mominul
4. Riyad
5. Shakib
6. Mushfiqur
7. Nasir
8. Shabbir
9. Mashrafe
10. Rubel
11. Taskin
100% agree

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Android)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old February 18, 2015, 12:20 PM
Eshen's Avatar
Eshen Eshen is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 27, 2007
Posts: 14,497

Assuming the match against Australia will be washed out, we need four pacers against Lanka (and no, I don't think Soumya has much to offer as a pacer, thus we need Al Amin too). I don't think this defensive ploy of playing an extra batsman, sacrificing a bowling spot will help.

Tamim
Soumya
Momin
Mushfiq
Shakib
Riyad
Sabbir
Mashrafe
Al Amin
Rubel
Taskin
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old February 18, 2015, 05:48 PM
Gowza Gowza is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273

Having seen soumya bowl in e last match he's someone who can bowl a few overs but he's not a genuine all rounder, we can get away with him in ODIs but in the longer format he wouldn't be in e all rounder bracket.

I'm thinking open with soumya now, do we give anamul another chance? Anamul can block but soumya did look more impressive all round.

Mushy at 3 for me with shakib and riyad in the next 2 spots, nasir to take the #6 role, sabbir the hitter at 7.

Then with 4 specialist pacers we still,have plenty of spin options with riyad, shakib and sabbir/nasir if we have to.

The biggest question with this line up would be do we have enough wicket takers with spin, or do we need another specialist spin option.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Kohli 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Miller 9 Procter 10 Marshall 11 Warne
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old February 18, 2015, 05:49 PM
Gowza Gowza is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273

I'd like to see liton brought in as opener after the World Cup, see how he goes, unless of course soumya or anamul cement a spot up the order in this World Cup.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Kohli 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Miller 9 Procter 10 Marshall 11 Warne
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old February 18, 2015, 06:09 PM
Mas_UK25's Avatar
Mas_UK25 Mas_UK25 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 15, 2015
Location: UNITED KINGDOM
Favorite Player: Mashrafe Bin Mortaza
Posts: 6,672

The problem having Mushy up there, you leave a long weak lower order. No, i dont trust none them after Shakib. Mushy is more reliable, plus he knows his role down there too, and packs a punch.


I'd go with :

Tamim
Sarkar
Mominul
Riyad
Shakib
Mushy
Shabbir
Mash
Rubel
Alamin
Taskin
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old February 18, 2015, 06:12 PM
Mas_UK25's Avatar
Mas_UK25 Mas_UK25 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 15, 2015
Location: UNITED KINGDOM
Favorite Player: Mashrafe Bin Mortaza
Posts: 6,672

Is it me or has any one seen Shakib and Mahmudullah bat together well? Cant think of any innings from them two in a good partnership!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old February 18, 2015, 06:13 PM
Gowza Gowza is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273

Nasir has been a proven international performer, even with his form slump his stats look good, he got a bit form form back recently so I'd give him a chance at the 6 spot. I trust nasir at 6 more than I trust mominul or anyone else (other than mushy) at 3.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Kohli 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Miller 9 Procter 10 Marshall 11 Warne
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old February 18, 2015, 10:32 PM
RazabQ's Avatar
RazabQ RazabQ is offline
Moderator
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: February 25, 2004
Location: Fremont CA
Posts: 11,902

I've said it before and I'll say it again. We cannot afford to play both Huqs. And much as I would like to get a 4th specialist bowler in (instead of relying on Riyadh, Sowmya and Shabbir) I do not see anything from our lower order to give me confidence to do that. I would find a way to get Nasir in. We have a genuine allrounder in Shakib. We _should_ be able to manufacture 10 overs hout of the 4 part-timers.

My lineup? And yes I know I'm all alone in this one
1) TiK
2) Riyadh
3) Soumya
4) Shakib
5) Mushy
6) Anamul
7) Shabbir
8) Nasir
9) Mash
10) Rubel
11) Taskin
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old February 18, 2015, 10:47 PM
Habib's Avatar
Habib Habib is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 30, 2007
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Favorite Player: A few
Posts: 10,854

Whatever is the line up,we must ensure that Shakib and Mushy get a chance to bat together. Their partnership is the most prolific for us, kind of like Sanga- Jaya partnership for SL. And I would pick Nasir in place of one of Anamul and Mominul.
__________________
Don't be a blind fan, be rational
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old February 19, 2015, 12:12 AM
betaar's Avatar
betaar betaar is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: March 24, 2004
Location: Land of the free
Favorite Player: The big hearted ones
Posts: 2,675

I don't think just changing the batting order will do us much good if players thinking and intent do not change.
__________________
www.TravelAssistonBoard.com - Your friend in the clouds!!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old February 19, 2015, 12:44 AM
Jadukor's Avatar
Jadukor Jadukor is offline
2019 WC Fantasy Winner
 
Join Date: October 17, 2010
Favorite Player: Shakib, Brian Lara
Posts: 14,076

All the other teams are getting fast starts and posting big totals while we are putting pressure on the middle order. The openers have to address this issue
__________________
Caught Somewhere in Time
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old February 19, 2015, 01:15 AM
jeesh jeesh is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 4, 2005
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Posts: 4,093

Against New Zealand or Australia this is a good lineup. But against Scotland, England and Sri Lanka, an extra spinner in place of one of Nasir/Shabbir wont be a bad idea.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old February 19, 2015, 01:23 AM
ma_o_mati's Avatar
ma_o_mati ma_o_mati is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: September 4, 2008
Posts: 1,375

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jadukor
All the other teams are getting fast starts and posting big totals while we are putting pressure on the middle order. The openers have to address this issue
We just played one game and got the monkey off our back. The team was watchful. I am sure the strategy will change as the tournament progresses.
__________________
o se shopno diye toiri se desh
Sriti diye ghera: amar-jonmovumi
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old February 26, 2015, 03:28 AM
Nadim's Avatar
Nadim Nadim is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: September 16, 2008
Location: Guantanamo
Favorite Player: Innocent Bird
Posts: 48,721

hasing 300+ and you bring shak at 6 and mushy at 7. Sorry I'm not a fan of Haturi. I don't get this stupid batting order.

And how the f£££ Mominul plays ahead of Nasir. Mominul couldn't even score runs in dpl the.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket