We deserved to lose this even though we won, we used a second string team, but a first string team against Ireland, I don't see the logic there but whatever
Originally Posted by Purbasha T
Ok, I guess it doesn't really carry any more significance, but still...
Quoring Ian O'Brien from Cricinfo:
'' .... The Bangla game was a tight one. ....
.... We needed 147 to win. Not a big score, but still one that was going to take a bit of work against a disciplined bowling attack. We needed 12 off the last over and it came down to the last ball for us to knock it off. Nathan did this in typical McCullum fashion, six off the first ball and then a four off the last to secure the win. ....''
Didn't we know there was a 3rd ball SIX and last ball TWO?
This is so confusing...
__________________
﴾اَلَاۤ اِنَّ اَوۡلِيَآءَ اللّٰهِ لَا خَوۡفٌ عَلَيۡهِمۡ وَلَا هُمۡ يَحۡزَنُوۡنَ ۖ ۚ ﴿۶۲
"Listen, the friends of Allah shall have no fear, nor shall they grieve" (Yunus: 62)