|
Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket
|
July 11, 2010, 03:52 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: August 3, 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 4,042
|
|
Imrul has to improve his strike-rate. His whole game is based at anchoring - with an SR of about 65-70 - too low, an anchor has to be at 75 at least. And he just can't attack, so he eats up balls if he stays until the last 10 overs, he can't accelerate.
|
July 11, 2010, 06:45 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: November 5, 2004
Favorite Player: Lara
Posts: 5,902
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarWolf
Some people are too nagging in this forum. I hope mods are following. I normally don't complain. But some people are really crossing civic limits. We have seen bans in the past with lesser minor issues.
|
I hope, the mods do not need to get involved in it. One argument leads to another and sometimes we may go overboard; but at the end of the day, we are talking here for the welfare of BD cricket. Our supported and suggested approaches may differ, some may be proved wrong, while some other are right; but guys, do not forget the aim, where we all are united.
__________________
try your best.
|
July 12, 2010, 12:34 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: July 10, 2010
Favorite Player: Hakan Yakin
Posts: 203
|
|
Colly would not be given with Hot Spot. Umpire gave a bad decision against him. So it evens out.
|
July 12, 2010, 12:43 AM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: December 23, 2007
Location: The Quiet Place
Favorite Player: Curtly Ambrose
Posts: 27,469
|
|
was Trotts 94 runs from 130 balls with SR of 72.31 useless ????
1. We can say if he had not score 94 o4 130 balls england would have lost by more runs.
BUT guess he scored 24 of 30. perhaps then some other ppl may have scored more than 70 in the rest of the 100 balls that trott faced.
2. he ended up SR of 72.3. if he had SR off 77 he would have scored 6 more runs and England could have won.
|
July 12, 2010, 01:17 AM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: March 26, 2007
Favorite Player: Bangladesh Team
Posts: 18,761
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eshen
.............
A big positive is - players seem to come together and plan things well in the match. So, yeah, may be Siddons should continue with his hands off approach and let them figure out things on their own.
|
Ya, as less siddons interfares is better. He is too bad in working out strategies/tactics.
__________________
[Post CWC19 Consistency Record: [B]Test: W-0 L-0 D-0/B]// ODI: W-0 L-3 // T20: W-0 L-0]
|
July 12, 2010, 04:39 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 31, 2010
Location: Dhaka,BD
Favorite Player: Tamim,Ash,Mash,Shakib
Posts: 5,153
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilscoop
I already pointed out. Go read it.
And no I dont think any body can or even bother to read your posts, whn u spk lyk dat al da time.
|
sorry.. But I think any body can or even bother to read your posts, whn u spk lyk dat al da time with some childish theory... go it??
Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Opera Mobile)
|
July 12, 2010, 05:32 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: December 18, 2007
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: tamim,shafiul,mushy
Posts: 6,743
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamisa
before criticizing someone for their english,pls get ur own grammar right first.the word confident is an adjective or a pronoun at times.u should have used the noun confidence here.how can u show "confident" in someone?
|
mistake there,i meant to write adverb not pronoun!
__________________
haruk ba jituk,i am always there with BD cricket!!!!
|
July 12, 2010, 03:26 PM
|
Cricket Guru Commissioner, MLC
|
|
Join Date: March 22, 2010
Posts: 13,532
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by offstump
was Trotts 94 runs from 130 balls with SR of 72.31 useless ????
|
It was because he couldn't finish it off. 94 doesn't do anything. Yes it decreases the margin of defeat but how does that help with anything? A lose is still a lose. He was suppose to get those 5 runs.
And that's what I said about Our Imrul. He had to stay there and finish things off. That would have got him his 2nd 100, better SR, would have proved that it's not all about Tamim, and most importantly give us a bigger total. (Again, yes we defended that low total today, but I am not talking about today, I am talking about in general. May be on other days, Bell wont be injured. And 230 wont be good enough). Yes it is also part of middle orders fault that they couldn't contribute. But when a set batsman gives it away like that at that part of the innings is a half-a$$ed job. Whole thing becomes pretty worthless. He shouldn't dance down the track and then check his shot. He should play to his strength.
It's not like I only blaming Imrul. I also blamed Tamim after he gave it away after scoring a 100 in one of those Tests.
|
July 12, 2010, 08:44 PM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ash,Tamim, Rahim,Sakib
Posts: 4,650
|
|
Tamim is losing it in ODIs. i dont know if he cannot understand that one has to be careful, he should know that the Brits set the trap for him and he seems not to comprehend this. He should look at jonathan Trott, the way he plods along and does not play a dumb shot. Tamim is on the field, surely he is observing Trott, is he so dumb as not to think that the opposing side knows that he likes to score quick runs and will set a trap for him. I think even a kid would understand this by now, but yet he seems quite oblivious and goes out and do what everyone expects, hit quick runs and get out.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 PM.
|
|