|
Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket
|
September 21, 2012, 06:36 AM
|
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: September 4, 2008
Posts: 1,375
|
|
Shafiul/Abul over Nazmul
I kinda expected this bashing. Nazmul is crucial bowler in our team. Leaving him out doesnt justify anything but this bashing from the kiwis. Shafiul was wayward which opened mccullum go all out. This selection sucks and we deserve to lose just for leaving nazmul alone.
Many might not agree on this arguement about nazmul not being picked resembles our bowling display today but sorry to say that shafiul is utter rubbish/crap
__________________
o se shopno diye toiri se desh
Sriti diye ghera: amar-jonmovumi
|
September 21, 2012, 07:27 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: February 20, 2006
Location: Washington D.C., USA
Favorite Player: David Warner
Posts: 3,484
|
|
What I wrote on the other thread -
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarufH
Bhai.. I watched the game and this is what I saw...
Over 4 - 21/1 Bowled by Razzaq 2 runs given (gets a wicket)
Over 5 - 29/1 Bowled by Mashrafe 8 runs given
Over 6 - 34/1 Bowled by Razzaq 5 runs given
In comes Shafiul
Over 7 - 45/1 Bowled by Shafiul 11 runs given
I think that was the starting point for McCullum going wild. I mean everyone knows how good he is against pace.
Over 15 123/2 Bowled my Mashrafe 10 runs given but gets a wicket
Over 16 128/2 Bowled by Shakib 5 runs given
In comes Shafiul
Over 17 143/2 Bowled by Shafiul 15 runs given.
... Rest is history.
Just my observation.
|
__________________
Bangladesh!
|
September 21, 2012, 07:38 AM
|
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: October 18, 2008
Location: Global City of Australia
Favorite Player: Shakib, Mashrafe
Posts: 13,524
|
|
Forget about Nazmul. Just pretend that we did not have any player named 'Nazmul' !
|
September 21, 2012, 07:44 AM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: February 26, 2007
Posts: 3,641
|
|
BUL MUL FIUL all are same.. only BEL is better than them..that is Rubel
|
September 21, 2012, 07:46 AM
|
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: August 30, 2007
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Favorite Player: A few
Posts: 10,854
|
|
Our fast bowling stock
One bowler injured and we are at sea.
|
September 21, 2012, 09:01 AM
|
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: April 9, 2011
Location: Sauga
Posts: 10,326
|
|
Nazmul was played only once I believe in the Europe tour, and was never chosen because his econ rate was 11...get this he only bowled one over....
Lad is unlucky, BCB were quick to forget his early strikes in the Asia Cup.
__________________
"How the little piglets would grunt if they knew how the old boar suffered."
|
September 21, 2012, 10:36 AM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: September 21, 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,610
|
|
I would take Nazmul over Abul and shaiful any day.
|
September 21, 2012, 12:42 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 4,228
|
|
Who needs to understand T20? Its our clueless selectors.
__________________
Golf is good, no umpire needed!
|
September 21, 2012, 01:26 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: March 19, 2011
Posts: 1,096
|
|
Nazmul should retire and play only club cricket. No point in sticking around knowing you will never get chosen consistently.
|
September 21, 2012, 02:53 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: June 10, 2010
Favorite Player: Shakib Al Hasan
Posts: 4,370
|
|
I'm not gonna say this again, but here you go.
Nazmul's recent T20 figures - 0-23(2) vs NED, 0-11(1) vs Ire, 2-41(4) vs Zim XI. He's a good ODI bowler, but not so in T20s. Shafi is in poor form, so replace him with someone else like Reza (hate myself for saying this) or Abul. NOT Nazmul.
|
September 22, 2012, 12:58 AM
|
|
2019 WC Fantasy Winner
|
|
Join Date: October 17, 2010
Favorite Player: Shakib, Brian Lara
Posts: 14,076
|
|
^^ those stats mean nothing in terms of how good he is because he never got a long consistent run to get into rythm. It has always been a single over here a couple of there in the very few matches he played. Even then he manages to take wickets as compared to shafiul
__________________
Caught Somewhere in Time
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.
|
|