Match Thread - 2nd Test - Bangladesh vs New Zealand @ SBNS, Dhaka; Oct 21-25, 2013 - Page 91

cricketboy · #**2251** October 24, 2013, 12:26 AM

2 gully and 2 short cover, seems like NZ figured out Mominul's scoring areas.

cricbook · #**2252** October 24, 2013, 12:26 AM

Looks like momi the man we r searching for????

Nadim · #**2253** October 24, 2013, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cricketboy
Mominul living dangerously. He should calm down. Lucky 4.

Wat game RU watching?

Lucky four???

Jadukor · #**2254** October 24, 2013, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sohel

And yes, batting is that simple conceptually.

And by my post i have now shown you how to put forward a perspective without being condescending

Yes, it is that simple conceptually!

Nadim · #**2255** October 24, 2013, 12:30 AM

Wth an extra over

cricketboy · #**2256** October 24, 2013, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nadim 98
Wat game RU watching?

Lucky four???

His last 4 was uppish. It could have easily gone to the square leg fielder.

Sohel · #**2257** October 24, 2013, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jadukor
yep that is how i see the game and i see success in the cautious approach by watching people like Dravid, Chanderpaul play the game or even Anderson in the last innings. Anderson was like 5 runs out of 39 balls at the start of his innings and he is supposed to be a stroke maker. I believe the longer you bat you will see the ball better and will have a higher chance of executing your shots and so if you eliminate risks early in your innings you can give yourself a better chance of building a score. Good batsman can play a range of shots but they decide to play straight and in the V early in their innings.

Must be GREAT to be you, then. I wonder what kind of psyche results in such cognitive dissonance! This was my original response to your asinine post. The response clarified what "playing a ball according to its merit" means, not according to me, but what it actually means for a game with normative concepts. Here it is again, but I'm sure you're itching to have the last, pointless word in a sad and juvenile attempt to redefine those norms.

I'm outta here. Whining, clueless posters like you make BC deeply annoying cricket forum nowadays.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sohel
Good batsmen do not take it "slow" or "fast" during tests. They try to play each ball according to its merit without premeditation, and execute high percentage shots while rotating the strike. The high percentage shots range from a good leave to a solid block to a nudge to a drive. That way they don't get bogged down.

The RR is less in tests because unlike the shorter formats, there are no restrictions tilting the game in the batsmen's favor, and that -- not some poorly formulated, archaic, ignorant and sissy idea -- is the reason why very few batters score quickly in tests.

Nadim · #**2258** October 24, 2013, 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cricketboy
His last 4 was uppish. It could have easily gone to the square leg fielder.

It bounced at least twice before it went to square leg

NoName · #**2259** October 24, 2013, 12:32 AM

TI's tuk-tuk better be worth it in the end if he goes on to score big, because rarely does his tuk-tuk get him anywhere!

cricbook · #**2260** October 24, 2013, 12:33 AM

If this two can bat untill 68 wiped out.... Telling u guys.... Match on.

MHRAM · #**2261** October 24, 2013, 12:34 AM

Good session for us. I think a win is a big ask but we need to bat well in the next session and we.will be back in the game

Posted via BC Mobile Edition

**Nasif** · #**2262** October 24, 2013, 12:36 AM

^^^ good session? How?

Jadukor · #**2263** October 24, 2013, 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sohel
Must be GREAT to be you, then. I wonder what kind of psyche results in such cognitive dissonance! This was my original response to your asinine post. The response clarified what "playing a ball according to its merit" means, not according to me, but what it actually means for a game with normative concepts. Here it is again, but I'm sure you're itching to have the last, pointless word in a sad and juvenile attempt to redefine those norms.

I'm outta here. Whining, clueless posters like you make BC deeply annoying cricket forum nowadays.

What is with you getting angry and upset and whining about leaving the forum everytime? At the end of the day i have an opinion and you have yours. You don't need to subscribe to my theory of Test cricket... i watch and love the game the way i see it and i express it here in the forum. We have a different view point. I don't need your approval stamp on my theories and I am certainly not gonna bow down and beg for your forgiveness because you don't agree. Jeez... just ignore my comments and follow the game

MHRAM · #**2264** October 24, 2013, 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nasif
^^^ good session? How?

I took our bowling into consideration. There was a danger of letting their tail get to 500.

Ideally, I would have liked to have seen Marshall still in the crease.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition

MHRAM · #**2265** October 24, 2013, 12:47 AM

Why are you guys fighting despite being seniors. enjoy the game like me.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition

Shartaz · #**2266** October 24, 2013, 12:51 AM

Bangladesh should just set up shop. And try to achieve the herculean task of batting out another 4 sessions. The two remaining today and the first two sessions tomorrow.

MHRAM · #**2267** October 24, 2013, 12:56 AM

I think batting 3 more sessions would be great. I am being optimistic though. Shaking and NASA need to step us because they have not done much in this series so far

Posted via BC Mobile Edition

SMHasan · #**2268** October 24, 2013, 12:57 AM

The freaking match timing is making me mad. No game is on weekends. Moreover they have put the T20 match at 1-30 pm on next wednesday, is it correct? Anyone?