Shoaib Akhter pulled from World Twenty20 squad due to genital warts!! - Page 2

capslock · #26 May 22, 2009, 10:43 AM

No fan of Shoaib, but this was a classless act from the PCB.

Kabir · #27 May 22, 2009, 02:05 PM

I wasn't posting on BC lately...but this thread title made me pitch in a few words.

I'm not a fan of Shoaib, neither am I a fan of PCB. But such acts by a board only tells you how stupid one can get. Respect one's privacy for God's sake.

Asaad...expected better argument from you bro.

Orpheus · #28 May 22, 2009, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by al Furqaan
ethics don't apply to shoaib akhtar...you live by the sword, you die by it.

Stop being judgmental ok? Not everyone that doesn't follow your religious values deserve to suffer.

Having multiple sex partners do not make a person immoral/bad. He didn't do anything illegal there.

And you don't need to have multiple sex partners to get STD, you just need a wrong partner. Given the prevalence of HPV, chances are high that anyone can get it.

anyways, there is no point of arguing with you about this - you will grow up one day.

Zeeshan · #29 May 22, 2009, 05:41 PM

Since you guys are talking about multiple sex partners....don't forget to mention that the fact that the fact Islam gives hi5 to being polygamous actually promotes the risk of having STDs eventhough I am not a master of contraceptive (here we go, out comes rojobda to rub it in me, why i am not).

Purbasha T · #30 May 22, 2009, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gopal Bhar
Since you guys are talking about multiple sex partners....don't forget to mention that the fact that the fact Islam gives hi5 to being polygamous actually promotes the risk of having STDs eventhough I am not a master of contraceptive (here we go, out comes rojobda to rub it in me, why i am not).

Lol, bro; don't let me start on this. Your statements contain serious misconception and an invalid ''fact''....So I guess you're just joking around........but still, just to clear. Islam only allows polygyny, but not polyandry, and that also under strictest of rulings. And medically speaking, polygyny itself promotes no risk of STDs, given that other relevant areas of Islam is maintained; like doing no ''stuff'' outside marriage .

And joking around on religions is just not acceptable. This is a cricket thread, so kindly keep the contents relevant; at least don't just jump on religions for GOD'S SAKE.

Orpheus · #31 May 22, 2009, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Purbasha T
Islam only allows polygyny, but not polyandry, and that also under strictest of rulings. And medically speaking, polygyny promotes no risk of STDs, given that other relevant areas of Islam is maintained; like doing no ''stuff'' outside marriage .

I think you need to think through your logic again. LOL!!

only relevant part here is no hanky panky outside marriage : otherwise poly-ginni or poly-zamai makes no difference does it?

Purbasha T · #32 May 22, 2009, 07:23 PM

Oh, saaad! He should've been in the WC. And well, as I personally don't know him; I would not comment on this. But if PCB has publicised it without Shoaib's consent, then that was really unfair and stupid.

Purbasha T · #33 May 22, 2009, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orpheus
I think you need to think through your logic again. LOL!!

only relevant part here is no hanky panky outside marriage : otherwise poly-ginni or poly-zamai makes no difference does it?

Well, I was replying to Gopal Bhar's post. So I guess you need to go through his post again.

Sovik · #34 May 22, 2009, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Surfer
Yes it is a STD (Sexually Transmitted Disease) and a bad one. And please dont google it if you dont want to spoil your day. Its really nasty.

its little late for that.

Orpheus · #35 May 22, 2009, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Purbasha T
Well, I was replying to Gopal Bhar's post. So I guess you need to go through his post again.

No I don't! If your post is logically fallible by itself - then it would be logically fallible as a reply to whatever.

Basically you can't make stuff up to reply someone, it has to stand on its own also.

btw, this only be my last post on anything religion -but Gopal is still right. Because the women you are marrying maybe divorced for whatever reason

(husband cheating lol)

Purbasha T · #36 May 22, 2009, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orpheus
Because the women you are marrying maybe divorced for whatever reason

(husband cheating lol)

Well, ye that is a possbible case, but I can't see how that opposes my views.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orpheus
Basically you can't make stuff up to reply someone, it has to stand on its own also.

I can't see either what exactly the 'stuff' is that I made up.

Orpheus · #37 May 22, 2009, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Purbasha T
Well, ye that is a possbible case, but I can't see how that opposes my views.

there are a lot of things you don't see. If you did, I wouldn't be in this thread talking to you now. I will re-quote you:

Quote:

1. Islam only allows polygyny, but not polyandry, and that also under strictest of rulings. 2. And medically speaking, polygyny promotes no risk of STDs

Your statement implies that since "medically speaking" (yes you are the voice of medicine) - polygyny promotes no risk of STDs - Islam is right in allowing polygyny. You also mentioned Islam do not allow polyandry. And since you haven't mentioned anything medically relevant to it, you inferred that polyandry somehow increases risk of STDs and hence Islam is right in banning it. If you didn't infer that, then there was no need for you to write statement 2.

In short, Islam's stance on polygyny (allowing it) and polyandry (not allowing it) really has no relevance medically eventhough you tried to establish one. Is that clear?

what makes it worse for you is that this was your reply to gopal's assertion that by allowing polygyny Islam promotes STDs... your defence of Islam is that "it doesn't allow polyandry" as if polyandry promotes STDs. I am just repeating myself now - so you can see the falacies of your argument.

I don't think you can come up with any reply to my post now to make me write more. SO good bye.

al Furqaan · #38 May 22, 2009, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orpheus

Having multiple sex partners do not make a person immoral/bad. He didn't do anything illegal there.

fair enough, but you contradicted yourself...implying that illegal actions make one immoral/bad.

doesn't morality and law have the same origin (i.e thought up by old bearded men)?

al Furqaan · #39 May 22, 2009, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gopal Bhar
Since you guys are talking about multiple sex partners....don't forget to mention that the fact that the fact Islam gives hi5 to being polygamous actually promotes the risk of having STDs eventhough I am not a master of contraceptive (here we go, out comes rojobda to rub it in me, why i am not).

well obviously if the people in the plural marriage already have STDs, which they most probably won't have if they've waited till marriage. you could conceivably get a spontaneously STD, but then it wouldn't be sexually transmitted in that case.

bottom line is shoaib is an arrogant idiot, and nothing happens to people except what they bring on themselves.

i wonder why umar gul wasn't dropped under the guise of genital warts???

cricket_king · #40 May 22, 2009, 10:19 PM

Lawl.

Ahh that Shoaib.

al-Sagar · #41 May 22, 2009, 10:32 PM

good for cricket that he is out.

also pakistan should be banned for 25 years from cricket like SA had a ban

Orpheus · #42 May 22, 2009, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by al Furqaan
fair enough, but you contradicted yourself...implying that illegal actions make one immoral/bad.

doesn't morality and law have the same origin (i.e thought up by old bearded men)?

I didn't contradict myself because I never implied illegal actions make one immoral. What I implied was that he didn't do anything illegal that it is any of your/our/PCB's business. Taking elicit drugs is illegal (but morally neutral). So, doping should be everyone's concern because he is breaking the fair play rule. But him having warts is nobody's business but his own.

And not all immoral act deserve punishment. What you said about Shoaib deserving warts is immoral but you shouldn't get herpes for that.

Rifat · #43 May 23, 2009, 12:26 AM

i am very curius if he is treated like this in this Duniya, thn how much more humiliation can the man handle in the afterlife? :scary thought:

Antora · #44 May 23, 2009, 02:20 AM

umm...
what happened to people respecting other people's privacy...?

Purbasha T · #45 May 23, 2009, 05:56 AM

Quote:

I don't think you can come up with any reply to my post now to make me write more. SO good bye.

Ooops! Sorry to prove you wrong, but here I come again.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orpheus
there are a lot of things you don't see. If you did, I wouldn't be in this thread talking to you now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orpheus
what makes it worse for you is that this was your reply to gopal's assertion that by allowing polygyny Islam promotes STDs... your defence of Islam is that "it doesn't allow polyandry" as if polyandry promotes STDs. I am just repeating myself now - so you can see the falacies of your argument.

Ok basically I was opposing two of the statements Gopal Bhar made.

1. Islam allows 'something' called ''polygamy''

Therefore to correct first of his statement (which he took to be as a fact, which it isn't), I said that what Islam allows is not necessarily polygamy, but polygyny. And just to clear, I mentioned the other classification of polygamy too, which is polyandry. (And I expected him to know what both means, so I didn't break it down)

2. And that 'something' promotes STDs

To oppose this, I said that the 'something' that Islam allows (which is polygyny) doesn't itself promote STDs unless other factors are involved; like Al-Furqaan bro said above that like one of the persons married already having STDs.

So Gopal Bhar was saying:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gopal Bhar
the fact that the fact Islam gives hi5 to being polygamous actually promotes the risk of having STDs eventhough I am not a master of contraceptive (here we go, out comes rojobda to rub it in me, why i am not).

that - Islam allows something that promotes STDs.
And I opposed it by saying - Islam allows something that doesn't promote STDs. (But I didn't go on to say - Islam doesn't allow anything that promotes STDs; in that case I would've had to talk about polyandry)

Shall I say Goodbye now? or wait for a little while more?

Purbasha T · #46 May 23, 2009, 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by al Furqaan
why would anyone want to sleep with him especially after this revelation?

wouldn't u want such info to be made public, so your daughter isn't caught up in allure and winds up getting burned? i'm sure anyone would.

when ur a pro athlete, or any other sort of person in the public eye, you lose some of your privacy. i'm not justifying this violation of HEPA standards, but lets look at it this way, a reason has to be given for why he's been omitted. basically the brother shouldn't have effed around. he's gonna have to lie in the bed that he made, no pun intended.

once again, shoaib's ability to self destruct shows no bounds.

Bhai! Ki din ailo je our daughters have to run away from Shoaib Akhtar only becuase he got STDs but not because of all the moral teachings we've been giving them since

bujhee kom · #47 May 23, 2009, 10:14 AM

Ooh thank you Orpheus bhai, so I won't get genital worts by touching frogs and toads...good! Thank Allah!

Orpheus · #48 May 23, 2009, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Purbasha T

And I opposed it by saying - Islam allows something that doesn't promote STDs. (But I didn't go on to say - Islam doesn't allow anything that promotes STDs; in that case I would've had to talk about polyandry)

Shall I say Goodbye now? or wait for a little while more?

It took you 1 day to come with the same garbage that you said before? You still don't get it do you? It doesn't matter what Islam allows or not - your whole premise is WRONG (that's why i said stop making things up or atleast think things through before typing). Poly-whatever increases risk of contracting a transmitted disease. Period. I am not fighting with you about Islam (if anything, I think Gopal is DEAD wrong), I was trying to point you your faulty reasoning.

why don't you just admit that your reasoning was wrong and thank me for pointing it out instead of trying so hard to defend something so dumb?

Orpheus · #49 May 23, 2009, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bujhee kom
Ooh thank you Orpheus bhai, so I won't get genital worts by touching frogs and toads...good! Thank Allah!

if you touch them with your genitals, the frogs might get warts though - so be careful. :P

Purbasha T · #50 May 23, 2009, 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orpheus
It took you 1 day to come with the same garbage that you said before? You still don't get it do you? It doesn't matter what Islam allows or not - your whole premise is WRONG (that's why i said stop making things up or atleast think things through before typing). Poly-whatever increases risk of contracting a transmitted disease. Period. I am not fighting with you about Islam (if anything, I think Gopal is DEAD wrong), I was trying to point you your faulty reasoning.

why don't you just admit that your reasoning was wrong and thank me for pointing it out instead of trying so hard to defend something so dumb?

Are you sure you can understand what you read? I'm not sure.