|
Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket
|
November 15, 2012, 05:04 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: February 20, 2006
Location: Washington D.C., USA
Favorite Player: David Warner
Posts: 3,484
|
|
1. Tamim
2. xx
3. xx
4. Naeem
5. Shakib
6. Mushy
7. Riyad / Nasir
8. Sohag
9. Sunny / Enamul
10. Mash
11. xx
I dont think we have good enough # 2 and 3 yet. Anamul/Mominul are not tested. We should play 4 full time bowler and Shakib. Riyad or Nasir both cant be in there. We need to aim to take 20 wickets.
__________________
Bangladesh!
|
November 15, 2012, 05:15 PM
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarufH
1. Tamim
2. xx
3. xx
4. Naeem
5. Shakib
6. Mushy
7. Riyad / Nasir
8. Sohag
9. Sunny / Enamul
10. Mash
11. xx
I dont think we have good enough # 2 and 3 yet. Anamul/Mominul are not tested. We should play 4 full time bowler and Shakib. Riyad or Nasir both cant be in there. We need to aim to take 20 wickets.
|
i think at this stage this is probably the best team structure for BD. that way we get 5 frontline bowlers (counting shakib) and we get 7 strong batsmen. the only thing is i think mash's test days are done and i would try anamul for sure in home conditions maybe even mominul.
and i agree there isn't room for both nasir and riyad, one of their spots needs to go to a bowler. we shouldn't need 8 batsmen to score a decent total anyway, is a negative way of looking at things and it negatively affects the bowling unit and the potential of winning the match.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Kohli 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Miller 9 Procter 10 Marshall 11 Warne
|
November 15, 2012, 03:49 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: June 28, 2012
Posts: 49
|
|
I think that Nayeen Islam can handle Zimb, NZ, India, Pakistan, SL, and WI. Not quite sure of SA, Aus and Eng on a fast pitch. He always showed temperment, and now he has a little better skillset. Aall the best to our new and potentially permanent # 4.
|
November 15, 2012, 06:06 PM
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273
|
|
i think in home conditions especially 5 bowlers is a good idea, even though the pacers don't take wickets the spinners do so anywhere with spin friendly conditions is BD's best chance of winning tests. i guess in pace friendly conditions there are more advantages of taking an 8th batsman since BD's pacers are basically ineffective no matter what and the spinners wicket-taking ability will be negated by conditions.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Kohli 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Miller 9 Procter 10 Marshall 11 Warne
|
November 15, 2012, 06:16 PM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: October 19, 2011
Favorite Player: Shak,TI,Mash,Mushy,Dravid
Posts: 4,138
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gowza
i think in home conditions especially 5 bowlers is a good idea, even though the pacers don't take wickets the spinners do so anywhere with spin friendly conditions is BD's best chance of winning tests. i guess in pace friendly conditions there are more advantages of taking an 8th batsman since BD's pacers are basically ineffective no matter what and the spinners wicket-taking ability will be negated by conditions.
|
Yeah agree !!!
|
November 15, 2012, 06:36 PM
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: March 14, 2006
Favorite Player: Viv - he made all scared
Posts: 935
|
|
Mushfiq can play as #3 in test for the time being. He has technique to do well
|
November 15, 2012, 06:45 PM
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaaL-PurusH
Mushfiq can play as #3 in test for the time being. He has technique to do well
|
not sure on that, he has had trouble with quality pace plus he keeps wicket so it would be physically very tough for him to bat at #3 also, unless you want to bring in another keeper.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Kohli 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Miller 9 Procter 10 Marshall 11 Warne
|
November 22, 2012, 10:33 AM
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: March 14, 2006
Favorite Player: Viv - he made all scared
Posts: 935
|
|
1. Tamim
2. Send anyone wearing kits and carrying bat
3. Naeem
4. Riyad
5. Shakib
6. Nasir
7. Amader ladder
Rest of them should be bowlers. Just field this team for next 1 yr and hope all the Haques get prepared and keep putting pressure on everyone to perform.
|
November 22, 2012, 10:42 AM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: August 18, 2009
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: All Bangladeshi players
Posts: 5,979
|
|
My future test line up from current bunch:
1. Tamim
2. Anamul
3. Nasir
4. Naeem
5.Shakib
6. Mushy
7. Riyad
8. Shohag
9. Sunny
10. Rubel
11. ........
|
November 22, 2012, 05:26 PM
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by M.H.Rubel
My future test line up from current bunch:
1. Tamim
2. Anamul
3. Nasir
4. Naeem
5.Shakib
6. Mushy
7. Riyad
8. Shohag
9. Sunny
10. Rubel
11. ........
|
that's a good line-up but i think in the long run there will be a few batsmen pushing hard to take a middle order spot e.g. mominul, shuvagata, tasamul.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Kohli 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Miller 9 Procter 10 Marshall 11 Warne
|
November 22, 2012, 06:00 PM
|
|
BD-SL Test Fantasy Winner 2017
|
|
Join Date: November 2, 2009
Favorite Player: Suhrawadi Shuvo
Posts: 5,167
|
|
The way I see it. Anamul should be our future #3. I would play Jahurul as the 2nd opener in our next Test against Sri Lanka. I've got a feeling we'll be playing musical chairs with #2 for a while. In the long run once Anamul is settled as a Test batsman I'd bump him upto #2 and stick Nasir at #3. In that way we'd no longer have any deadwoods in the team and we can have 5 bowlers.
Present lineup:
1. Tamim
2.
3. Anamul
4. Naeem
5. Shakib
6. Mushy
7. Nasir
8. Mahmudullah
9. Sohag
10. Rubel
11. Nazmul
Future lineup:
1. Tamim
2. Anamul
3. Nasir
4. Naeem
5. Shakib
6. Mushy
7. Mahmudullah
8. Sohag
9. Elias
10. Rubel
11. Nazmul
|
November 22, 2012, 06:21 PM
|
|
Super Moderator BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678
|
|
There's no future if they can't score 500 on a batting paradise.
Posted via BC Mobile Edition
|
November 22, 2012, 06:30 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2012
Location: London, UK
Favorite Player: Shakib and Anamul
Posts: 866
|
|
Well we have 3 different formats and based on record and ability these would be my preferred lineups full time:
T20
01.Tamim
02.Ashraful
03.Shakib
04.Rahim
05.Nasir
06.Jahurul
07.Rahman
08.Mortaza
09.Razzak
10.Sunny
11.Nazmul
ODI
01.Tamim
02.Imrul
03.Anamul
04.Shakib
05.Nasir
06.Rahim
07.Mahmudullah
08.Mortaza
09.Razzak
10.Nazmul
11.Abul/Rubel/Shafiul
Test
01.Tamim
02.Shahriar
03.Anamul
04.Naeem
05.Shakib
06.Rahim
07.Nasir
08.Mahmudullah
09.Mortaza (If he's fit) or Rubel/Nazmul
10.Gazi/Sunny
11.Abul/Nazmul
|
November 22, 2012, 07:54 PM
|
|
BD-SL Test Fantasy Winner 2017
|
|
Join Date: November 2, 2009
Favorite Player: Suhrawadi Shuvo
Posts: 5,167
|
|
I've got a feeling Sohag will be used in all 3 formats especially after the way McCullum took our 1 dimensional 3 man SLA attack apart in a T20. Sohag can bat a bit too.
|
November 22, 2012, 08:24 PM
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273
|
|
i agree i think sohag will be used in all 3 formats and i think mominul is close to a call-up in all 3 formats so we may well find him in the team in at least one format soon.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Kohli 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Miller 9 Procter 10 Marshall 11 Warne
|
November 22, 2012, 08:49 PM
|
|
BD-SL Test Fantasy Winner 2017
|
|
Join Date: November 2, 2009
Favorite Player: Suhrawadi Shuvo
Posts: 5,167
|
|
Not sure about Mominul. What position would you play him? Anamul has a better chance due to positions available at the top of the order.
|
November 22, 2012, 08:53 PM
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273
|
|
yes well mominul is a middle order bat, #3 at the highest, so i'd either have him at 3 or have him replace riyad, at least in ODIs. riyad's bowling is most effective in t20s, i don't think we'll miss it much in ODIs and tests. so in ODIs he'd take riyad's spot, in tests he could take the #3 spot. for some reason i have a feeling he's going to get his chance in the up coming one-dayers or in the t20.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Kohli 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Miller 9 Procter 10 Marshall 11 Warne
|
November 22, 2012, 09:40 PM
|
|
BD-SL Test Fantasy Winner 2017
|
|
Join Date: November 2, 2009
Favorite Player: Suhrawadi Shuvo
Posts: 5,167
|
|
If he takes #3 where would you put Anamul? The only way I see him in the ODI team is if they put Anamul at #2 and Mominul at #3. I don't think they'd debut both at the same time so I'd debut Anamul first and then take it from there. I'd keep Riyad at 7 for now.
|
November 22, 2012, 10:16 PM
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger Manc
If he takes #3 where would you put Anamul? The only way I see him in the ODI team is if they put Anamul at #2 and Mominul at #3. I don't think they'd debut both at the same time so I'd debut Anamul first and then take it from there. I'd keep Riyad at 7 for now.
|
anamul could play at #2, and i already said i'd probably selected mominul over riyad.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Kohli 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Miller 9 Procter 10 Marshall 11 Warne
|
November 22, 2012, 09:50 PM
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: March 14, 2006
Favorite Player: Viv - he made all scared
Posts: 935
|
|
I guess selectors are grooming anamul to take #3. He's been playing at #3 in everywhere
|
November 23, 2012, 12:46 AM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: April 18, 2007
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Nazimuddin
Posts: 35,464
|
|
Provided they don't decline over the years, I think we'll see the following batting lineup 3 years from now:
1. Tamim Iqbal
2. Soumya Sarkar
3. Anamul Haque Bijoy (WK)
4. Shubhagoto Hom/Mushfiqur Rahim/Mominul Haque Shourobh/Asif Ahmed Ratul/Nayeem Islam/Liton Kumar Das
5. Shakib Al Hasan (C)
6. Nasir Hossain
7. Mahmudullah Riyad/Nurul Islam Sohan (WK)
8. Abul Hossain Raju
9. Shohag Gazi
10. Taskin Ahmed Tajin
11. Rubel Hossain
__________________
"And do not curse those who call on other than GOD, lest they blaspheme and curse GOD, out of ignorance. We have adorned the works of every group in their eyes. Ultimately, they return to their Lord, then He informs them of everything they had done." (Qur'an 6:108)
|
November 23, 2012, 07:55 AM
|
|
Super Moderator BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678
|
|
And even with that lineup, we will continue to lose to Turkmenistan.
Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Blackberry)
|
November 23, 2012, 09:13 AM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: April 18, 2007
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Nazimuddin
Posts: 35,464
|
|
Tajikistan, definitely. Uzbekistan, probably. Kazakhstan, possibly. Kirghizistan, never.
Not sure about Turkmenistan at this point.
__________________
"And do not curse those who call on other than GOD, lest they blaspheme and curse GOD, out of ignorance. We have adorned the works of every group in their eyes. Ultimately, they return to their Lord, then He informs them of everything they had done." (Qur'an 6:108)
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.
|
|