Corey Anderson was the Difference

t20lover · #1 November 6, 2013, 05:58 AM

This guy single handedly took the match away from us since he came in to bowl. His bowling figure 4 overs 21 runs 2 wicket.

RazabQ · #2 November 6, 2013, 06:00 AM

he and Southee. Compare Southee to our pace spearhead

**Zunaid** · #3 November 6, 2013, 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazabQ
he and Southee. Compare Southee to our pace spearhead

Southee is a brilliant death bowler.

Night_wolf · #4 November 6, 2013, 06:03 AM

anderson had a good tour

Rifat H · #5 November 6, 2013, 06:05 AM

Pura tour ai Correy anderson ke khelte problem hoiche .

MHRAM · #6 November 6, 2013, 06:09 AM

He is a useful bowler. Great slower deliveries

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Android)

Maysun · #7 November 6, 2013, 06:25 AM

Anderson is a very good impact player!

shuziburo · #8 November 6, 2013, 06:40 AM

He also scored 18 off 6.

IanW · #9 November 6, 2013, 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zunaid
Southee is a brilliant death bowler.

He's not too bad at the life either.

MHRAM · #10 November 6, 2013, 07:52 AM

We really need this sort of fringe players.

Someone who will score big when necessary and bowl some few good overs in between

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Android)

WarWolf · #11 November 6, 2013, 08:02 AM

The major difference is between pace attacks of two teams. In shorter versions of the game you need pacers who can hit the block hole at will and have good variations. Al Amin demonstrated this qualities a bit and was rewarded.

It's really tough winning T20I or test matches with spin heavy attack. We have to wait to see regular wins in T20I or test matches until we get some good pacers.

MHRAM · #12 November 6, 2013, 08:10 AM

We really missed shak

He is an awesome death bowler. Shafiul and rubel aren't bad either especially the former

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Android)

ddude · #13 November 6, 2013, 09:08 AM

Could also be al Amin for that catch dropped in the first over :P

Razi · #14 November 6, 2013, 12:02 PM

Why the hell can't we pick slower deliveries? Corey prolly bowled 20 slower ones out of 24 and yet we failed to hit 90% of them. Whereas, they were hitting sixes at will off Mash's slower ones.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition

RazabQ · #15 November 6, 2013, 01:53 PM

Razi you do that there are 3 to 4 variations right? The one that you have in your palm instead of finger tips, there's the one that you bowl with an off-cutter action, the one you bowl with a leg-cutter action and then there's the really hard to read back of hand version. With a scrambled seam, it's not always easy to pick out which variation you are bowling.

SS · #16 November 6, 2013, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazabQ
Razi you do that there are 3 to 4 variations right? The one that you have in your palm instead of finger tips, there's the one that you bowl with an off-cutter action, the one you bowl with a leg-cutter action and then there's the really hard to read back of hand version. With a scrambled seam, it's not always easy to pick out which variation you are bowling.

Wish Mash listened to Razabda... Mash will never learn

*AsifTheManRahman* · #17 November 6, 2013, 02:16 PM

Nazmul Hossain is probably the only Bangladeshi bowler who can bowl a couple of variations of the slower ball really well. Rubel of late has developed a decent slower one too. Mash is just turning out to be a #facepalm bowler - if you can't bowl in the death, your job as a fast bowler is only half done.

MustaphaAli · #18 November 6, 2013, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MHRAM
We really missed shak

He is an awesome death bowler. Shafiul and rubel aren't bad either especially the former

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Android)

Shafiul is maybe the best from all of them

shuziburo · #19 November 6, 2013, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razi
Why the hell can't we pick slower deliveries? Corey prolly bowled 20 slower ones out of 24 and yet we failed to hit 90% of them. Whereas, they were hitting sixes at will off Mash's slower ones.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition

Disguise is the key. Mash might be telegraphing his slower deliveries...

Rinathq · #20 November 6, 2013, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MHRAM
We really missed shak

He is an awesome death bowler. Shafiul and rubel aren't bad either especially the former

Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Android)

Rubel... T20 death over bowler??

Tiger444 · #21 November 6, 2013, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rinathq
Rubel... T20 death over bowler??

Rubel and Shafiul are better death over bowlers than Mash is.

Rinathq · #22 November 6, 2013, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiger444
Rubel and Shafiul are better death over bowlers than Mash is.

Shafiul yes, Rubel.... i dont see how. Not in T20 at least

Tiger444 · #23 November 6, 2013, 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rinathq
Shafiul yes, Rubel.... i dont see how. Not in T20 at least

Well its hard to compare. Mash has played 21 T20Is and Rubel 7. So we can't really compare in T20Is. More of our observations have to come from ODIs since we have a much bigger sample and from what I've seen, Rubel is the better death bowler compared to Mash.

MHRAM · #24 November 7, 2013, 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rinathq
Rubel... T20 death over bowler??

I never said they are good, just that they are better than mashrafee.

From what I have seen, rubel can bowl some good Yorkers as show. in the 3rd ODI

Posted via BC Mobile Edition

Rinathq · #25 November 7, 2013, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiger444
Well its hard to compare. Mash has played 21 T20Is and Rubel 7. So we can't really compare in T20Is. More of our observations have to come from ODIs since we have a much bigger sample and from what I've seen, Rubel is the better death bowler compared to Mash.

exactly.. I dont think its fair to compare these 2 in terms of T20 bowling. At the same time, ODI death over experience isnt the same as T20 experience. I agree that Rubel is a better death over bowler compared to Mash (At least more consistent) but that does not change his horrific T20 records which makes him as bad (if not worse) than Mash in this format