|
Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket
|
July 20, 2005, 07:34 PM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 2,845
|
|
Gloucestershire Day One
Like Gaul, Bangladesh's tour of England has been divided into four parts.
Part one was the short series of three-day games, against the British Universities and several counties.
Part two was the two Tests against England.
Part three was the NatWest one-day series.
This is part four - a coda of three- and one-day games.
Wisely, Bangladesh's management have decided that there is little benefit to be gained from established players like Habibul Bashar, Mustafa Mortaza and Khaled Mashud to keep playing, and have replaced them with a number of fringe players.
These players hae done creditably on their first day against Gloucestershire, a county in the First Division of the English county championship.
Shahadat appears to have found his rhythm again, dismissing the Gloc's opening bat for a duck, and then keeping the pressure on. Notably, he contributed no wides to the extras column.
Syed Rassel bowled tight and successfully ; he's the sort of fastish medium pace left armer that has been historically successful in England, and he completed the job on Gloc's top order that Shahadat started.
Talha Jubair, bowling first change, also got among the wickets.
Enamul was tight, and Rahman got one in his six overs.
Bangladesh's bowlers, in their 58 overs, gave away only six no-balls and no wides -an extra every ten overs or so.
The overall economy rate and the lack of extras indicates to me that the seamers bowed tight and on the required line - from the scoring rate and lack of extras, there appeared to be little that sat up and begged to be hit.
In summary, it was good bowling in English conditions, and if they can continue in this vein, then I believe that their performances will be noted by certian county selectors.
The batting saw ex-England ODI player Jon Lewis and big seamer James Averis do damage to the Bangladesh's top order, but Alok Kapali and Tushar Imran stopped the rot with an unbeaten 69 run partnership.
It's important they go on with it, because there isnt a lot of batting to back them up, although Rahim and Rahman both have first-class centuries.
But if, in this fourth part of Bangladesh's tour of England, the bowlers continue to bowl tight and with the conditions, I'll be a lot happier about the future of the Tigers' bowling attack.
Ian Whitchurch
|
July 20, 2005, 07:40 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: September 14, 2003
Location: Pacific
Posts: 2,498
|
|
I nominate this for the front page.
|
July 20, 2005, 08:56 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: February 6, 2005
Posts: 152
|
|
wisely stated by "IanW".....
:tiger:
|
July 20, 2005, 09:11 PM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: June 18, 2005
Posts: 368
|
|
IAN,
The bowling attack of Bangladesh is more potent than their Batting.Dont you think so.I being an Indian always felt that the bowling of Indians let down the team.But in Bangladesh's Cricket its been the reverse scenario..Their Bowling has been more consistent than their Batting.In the recently concluded test series betwn ENGvs BAN because the batting was utterly poor the bowlers felt the pressure and failed to take wickets..Whats ur reply?
|
July 20, 2005, 09:28 PM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 2,845
|
|
I dont call any batting side that boasts Bash, Ash, Aftab and Mashud a poor batting side.
The issue is the bowlers to back up Masrafee and Rafique ... Shahadat and one other seamer taking a step up helps immensely, as does Enamul continuing his progress.
Ian Whitchurch
|
July 20, 2005, 10:33 PM
|
|
BanglaCricket Staff
|
|
Join Date: July 15, 2002
Location: 16th floor
Posts: 4,106
|
|
I see what you are trying to say here banindfan. However, I would rephrase it as "So far the Bangladeshi batsmen have under-achieved, while the bowlers have been reasonable". But I have to agree with you on the fact that it is very hard to judge the performance of our bowlers in the England test series since the batsmen simply didn't give them much to bowl at. One can not ignore the "knock-on effect" that the poor batting performance had on the morale and subsequent performance of the bowlers.
Quote:
Originally posted by banindfan
IAN,
The bowling attack of Bangladesh is more potent than their Batting.Dont you think so.I being an Indian always felt that the bowling of Indians let down the team.But in Bangladesh's Cricket its been the reverse scenario..Their Bowling has been more consistent than their Batting.In the recently concluded test series betwn ENGvs BAN because the batting was utterly poor the bowlers felt the pressure and failed to take wickets..Whats ur reply?
|
|
July 20, 2005, 10:37 PM
|
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: June 14, 2005
Location: Downstairs
Posts: 1,206
|
|
Bangladesh A played very well to get them all-out ......... a satisfied match so far .
|
July 20, 2005, 11:11 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Location: In my room
Favorite Player: Mushi
Posts: 6,709
|
|
alok doing good out there.... hopefully he can continue tom and go on to score some runs...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.
|
|