Bowling is about line and length? when will our stupid selectors understand that?

[ma_o_mati]

None of them selectors were fast bowler....bowling is about line and length not freakin speed...this is getting ridiculous...why r these moron selectors chosing pacers based on speed but not on line and length or variations>..none of them hv great speed anyway....y r they willing to let go off line and length for the expense of speed

[ReZ_1]

^^ so by your definition russel should be the best choice..

[ma_o_mati]

^^ there is no my definition. All the great bowlers always maintained line and length. And thats the basic of bowling. If you are talking about syed rasel not russel, then yes i think he had a better wicket taking abilities and average than abul and co.