|
Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket
|
February 2, 2010, 10:58 PM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 10, 2009
Posts: 438
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bujhee kom
Oh sorry Catskills mama for confusing you with Sandy mama! You are still my dear mama!
Sandy mama(Sandpiper) got banned a year or so ago!
|
No Problem Thank you for kind word.
|
February 2, 2010, 11:29 PM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: September 7, 2006
Location: Uk
Favorite Player: Mashrafe Mortaza
Posts: 2,148
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zainab
Rocky is JS's favourite. he will never drop him, you guys should know that by now, even JS knows that Rocky is not a 20/20 player. Kapali would have done better than him, at least, he can bat, bowl and field, take catches, whereas Rocky drops simple catches.
|
sad but why, it seems we r losing before playing, one batsman or bowler can make a difference,but still they r picking Rock. we have already seen in 20 20 world cup, what he has done.................................how funny our management.
why do we need Rock to steady up when we have Ash, Mushy Sakib, riyadh who can slog and steadying up the innings, when every ball is important in 20 20. We can instead use a spin bowler, Alok or Razzak (as we know opposition is not good playing spin) who can hit a six, make a contribution with bat as well.
how funny Siddions and Management, they always lack ghilu
|
February 2, 2010, 11:33 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: July 11, 2009
Posts: 2,722
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miraz
Bangladesh name team for T20 against New Zealand
The Bangladesh team for the T20 International against New Zealand at Seddon Park, Hamilton tomorrow (Wednesday, 03 February):
1. Tamim Iqbal
2. Mohammad Ashraful
3. Aftab Ahmed
4. Shakib Al Hasan (captain)
5. Roqibul Hassan
6. Mahmudullah
7. Naeem Islam
8. Mushfiqur Rahim (vice captain/wk)
9. Shahadat Hossain
10. Shafiul Islam
11. Nazmul Hossain
12th Man: Imrul Kayes
Note: The match starts at 12pm Bangladesh Standard Time (+6 GMT) and will be LIVE on Sky Sports
Media & Communications Department
|
i like this squad 90%....not because of 100%.....why shahadat? and why not rubel in this squad?
|
February 2, 2010, 11:35 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: July 11, 2009
Posts: 2,722
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dolcevita
Tamim , shakib and naeem will do the job
Posted via BC Mobile Edition (iPhone)
|
dont forget about ash....
|
February 2, 2010, 11:36 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Ashraful,mashrafe,shakib
Posts: 3,847
|
|
The exclusion of Razzak is more than justified, he looked like a 2nd division bowler in the tri nation, with bowling half trackers twice an over. He looked worse than Nayeem with the ball.
Plus, Rajib/Shafiul both have performed tremendously well in the last series, and have earned the spot. 3 pacers in NZ, makes perfect sense
__________________
GODISNOWHERE now read it again.
|
February 2, 2010, 11:38 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 18,718
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beshideshi
The exclusion of Razzak is more than justified, he looked like a 2nd division bowler in the tri nation, with bowling half trackers twice an over. He looked worse than Nayeem with the ball.
Plus, Rajib/Shafiul both have performed tremendously well in the last series, and have earned the spot. 3 pacers in NZ, makes perfect sense
|
Bingo !!
__________________
"Make Bangladesh Cricket Great Again"
|
February 2, 2010, 11:57 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: October 14, 2004
Location: Nijhum Dwip
Favorite Player: Nasir/Taskin/Anamul/Sohag
Posts: 4,743
|
|
100 wickets, possible?
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereWeGo
What is it about Raqibul that Jamie Siddons love so much??
I mean Rock for T20 ? really? I mean Really????
BTW Saqlain Sajib got another 6fer yesterday....how long will he be ignored?
|
Off the topic though, should he play all the matches in NCL, he might end up with 100 wickets in NCL this season.
With Razzak a proven failure in Tests, and Enamul failing to deliver, he stands a GOOD CHANCE to test the technique of the english!
__________________
Bangladesh's Win (agt any team) = 100% Joy
India's Loss (agt any team) = 100% Joy
So, only opportunity for me to double my joy is when Bangladesh BEATs India!!!
|
February 3, 2010, 12:09 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: January 10, 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,870
|
|
Rakibul Hasan?
....
ARE THEY INSANE?
__________________
A friend in need is a friend indeed; a friend with weed is better.
|
February 3, 2010, 12:25 AM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 10, 2009
Posts: 438
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beshideshi
The exclusion of Razzak is more than justified, he looked like a 2nd division bowler in the tri nation, with bowling half trackers twice an over. He looked worse than Nayeem with the ball.
Plus, Rajib/Shafiul both have performed tremendously well in the last series, and have earned the spot. 3 pacers in NZ, makes perfect sense
|
I totally agree with you. But If that is the case then how come they didn't select other spinner like Shuvo to replace Razzak? We have strength in spin bowling, shouldn't we use it? Be it Razzaq or Shuvo or someone else. Remember in T20/ODI when our pacers get hamered, it is our spinners who slow down the run rate.
|
February 3, 2010, 12:34 AM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 10, 2009
Posts: 438
|
|
By the way, Saqlain Sajib is having a time of his life in NCL. Perhaps our BD Mendis or BD Saqlain Mustaq, spinning with dosra and tesra in every match. Kicking everyone's pants off.
|
February 3, 2010, 12:39 AM
|
|
Cricket Guru T20 WC 2010 Fantasy Winner
|
|
Join Date: June 18, 2005
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: ABD / Kalam / Musta
Posts: 9,787
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bujhee kom
Oh sorry Catskills mama for confusing you with Sandy mama! You are still my dear mama!
Sandy mama(Sandpiper) got banned a year or so ago!
|
RIP Sandy man!! miss him too
__________________
Armchair selectors name their XI and conduct heated selection meetings on internet. Blood young players, some experts cry. Pick the best players, regardless of age, insist others.
|
February 3, 2010, 01:51 AM
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 7, 2010
Posts: 529
|
|
yes people welcome to the reality.
|
February 3, 2010, 01:57 AM
|
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: October 18, 2008
Location: Global City of Australia
Favorite Player: Shakib, Mashrafe
Posts: 13,524
|
|
where is everybody ?? still watching the game.....huh ! :@
|
February 3, 2010, 02:11 AM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: March 9, 2008
Location: Ω
Posts: 35,906
|
|
Take that Roq haters!!!! Highest score PLUS a sixer.
Holler!
|
February 3, 2010, 02:23 AM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 18,718
|
|
I hope all those fan's pan-pani about Rokibul will stop ....
Yes Rakibul may not suite for your ideal T20 team, but our team is nowhere near ideal.
When Dashing Tamim scored 14 runs with SR 155
When "Talent-e Tosh toshe" Motin scored 11 runs with SR 78
When Dashing Aftab scored 12 runs with SR 85
When Super Duper Sakib scored 2 runs with SR 60
When steady rahim scored a duck with SR 0
When solid Riyad scored 11 runs with SR 47
When chokka Naeem scored 5 runs with SR 45
The ugly duckling Rokibul scored 18 runs with SR 138
So if you need to do further pan-panani, then I suggest do that for the right reason that our super talented dashing top order. When your top 7 batsman fails, it doesn't matter whether its Rokibul, Kobirul or Korimul is playing at #8 slot.
How come the supposedly most slowpoke player scored the most run with second best SR in the team?
So may be its not the coach but some of the fans know less only that they don't realize that.....
__________________
"Make Bangladesh Cricket Great Again"
|
February 3, 2010, 03:25 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 4,228
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fazal
How come the supposedly most slowpoke player scored the most run with second best SR in the team?
.....
|
Thats because the game was already over by then. Even Rafiq could have done better than that. Even Ziaur could have done better. #8 is reserved for an alrounder. He in no alrounder and no T20 batsman. Only the dumb selectors like ours will selelct him, any other team, including Nigeria would discard him for T20.
__________________
Golf is good, no umpire needed!
|
February 3, 2010, 03:26 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 4,228
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeeshanM
Take that Roq haters!!!! Highest score PLUS a sixer.
Holler!
|
One day you will learn T20, and I hope this pathetic team learns it with you.
__________________
Golf is good, no umpire needed!
|
February 3, 2010, 07:23 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: January 26, 2010
Posts: 88
|
|
Mark my words Rock is NOT a match winner and wont be.... he got high score cos he stayed in crease longer and still was crap
|
February 3, 2010, 10:20 AM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 18,718
|
|
With your "could have ... should have" scenario, ofcourse anything isn possible...even someone could claim Junaid would have scored a century...however these kind of scenario is based on speculation not fact as in reality they didn't played in that game and therefore one can claim equally that Rafiq/Ziaul would have scored a duck with SR 0 and he will be equally correct as you are with your claim.
Even for the sake of argument, if we assume you are right, still that means Rafiq/Ziaul would also score more than our top 7 batsman in the team in that game. Therefore even in your scenario, Rakibul wan not the problem in that game.... our front 7 batsman were. That's where we lost the game. A Juniad/Imrul/Alok woudn;t save us that game.
When our top order (who ever then end up with) start perfroming consistenly, at that point there will be no need for a player like rakibul may be.... but now complaining the inclusion of rakibul is pointless. To me complaining about a player who just scored 18 runs with SR 155, is not where our complain should be .... our complain should be our fragile top order filled with so called dashing batsman who fails more often than not.
And thanks but no thanks... for now I would rather stick with "Stupid selectors and coach"... they are not perfect.... but I have no problem sticking with Rakibul for now a little longer before figuring out our main issue ..... our fragile and paper tiger top order in T20.
__________________
"Make Bangladesh Cricket Great Again"
|
February 3, 2010, 11:59 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: February 3, 2009
Posts: 696
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siraji
Thanks for clarifying. I'm not gonna tell you're wrong.I respect your intelligence and I expect you to find that out yourself.
|
I found it out today.
|
February 3, 2010, 12:08 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 18,718
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peace
I found it out today.
|
What a reversal ....Looks like now it's Siraji's intelligence at stake now.
I still respect Siraji's intelligence though.
__________________
"Make Bangladesh Cricket Great Again"
|
February 3, 2010, 12:12 PM
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: February 24, 2004
Posts: 10,203
|
|
Announcement koira joto na shomoi niche ...our innings lasted less than that...kamer theika preparation beshi
|
February 3, 2010, 12:18 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: February 3, 2009
Posts: 696
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fazal
What a reversal ....Looks like now it's Siraji's intelligence at stake now.
I still respect Siraji's intelligence though.
|
I have no doubt about Siraji's intelligence.
It was just a fluke, and Roq’s contribution counted for nothing because it did not win us the match.
Remember intelligence is permanent (class), and the form is temporary.
|
February 3, 2010, 12:34 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: June 18, 2005
Location: newyork
Favorite Player: Ryder,Tamim,shakib,warner
Posts: 6,134
|
|
i want next time this team
javed omar
mehrab jr
faruk ahmed (selector and captain)
khaled masud
rajin saleh
rokibul hasan
shahadat
rubel
enamul haq moni
santo
monju
in our 20/20 team, plz dont exclude one single person
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 AM.
|
|