Rajjak Chucks

[samircreep]

I noticed it in the one dayers but it's gotten increasingly worse: Raju definitely chucks. It becomes all the more apparent when he goes for the arm ball and when he wants to bowl the one that drifts in to the batsmen.

ANyways, expect to hear something right after this test match.

[cracky]

I thought Rajjak sucks.

[AsifTheManRahman]

which is also true.

[cricket_pagla]

Rajjak is grt!... he is especial player of our special team... n 1 mor thin.. he's not a chucker!..

[rudro]

I am ok with chucking or whatever you want to call it as long as umpires are OK with it. But I agree, he sucks.

[cricman]

I see more potental in him as a Batsmen than a spinner. Very Strong and can go over the top with ease. Took a AMAZING catch from lee to get him.

[sadi]

probably it will be his first and last test

[sar2005]

I feel sorry for Rana. With his experience, selectors just choose to give Rajjak a chance inteade of Rana (though I believe they both are ODI player).

[Sovik]

abdur razzak had to remodel his action. if umpires don't complain then he would be ok

[zakirc]

Yes he does chuck and also sux.

Despite the strategic need of having two specialist spinners, we really should have included Rasel (rather than Razzak) in place of Enamul Jr . There is no use to have a bowler like Razzaq just for the sake of strategy. Rasel could have gained valuable experience from this match for the ODI's and we could also have a look at how economic he can be against the Aussies. I dont recall Razzaq ever doing good against any strong opposition.

[SMHasan]

I find nothing in him still people bring him in the team.Dont know why. No turn no flight no clever bowling extremely dull. There is no life in his bowling. Dont we have a better spinner in our country? Rubbish.

[Nasif]

I have uploaded Razzak's action during last time he was reported. Check all the footage you will get some idea about his action.
http://www.banglacricket.com/games/picture.php?p=139

[Ak]

Looks dodgy - I'm not sure but it does look like it.

[chinaman]

Nowthing new. He was reported long ago and his actions were rectified since. Interestingly, he was reported under the old law where the maximum allowable angle was just 5 degrees for a spinner.

Currently upto 15 degrees of elbow bending is allowed giving him quite a lot of legal comfort zone.

He has not even been reported since. I find it disturbing to label someone with what he is not.

[shamster]

Shame .. he looks to have good economy rate. Hopefully he will be ok against weaker nation. Give the guy fair due its his first test and BG as whole are not doing well... if it was at Fatullah may be he would have done better ??

[Hatebreed]

He probably doesn't chuck but he sucks, even though it's his debut... in fact almost everyone in our team sucks... except Rajin, Rafique and Shahadat.

[Albanycrew]

hahaha....... I thought you meant to write "sucks".

[sadi]

I guess he sucks but remember its only his first test and spinners get better with experience and also against australia, tough debut I must say...

[Locutus]

I know that he sucks, but don't know about "chucks".

[mhferdaus]

Originally Posted by Locutus
I know that he sucks, but don't know about "chucks".

I wonder if he is going to any problem with ICC after playing with big guns and doing good ???

[Fazal]

Chucks or Sucks or both ....who cares?

Atleast when he plays, most of the time he delivers.

Thats mattter more to me.

If/when he is again grounded for chucks, we will deal with that at that time. For now, he is one of the top three performers in the team, lets recognize that first.

[Rihaad The Man]

Another stupid thread .If you have problem then do talk with the ICC & never open the thread like this like whatever comes in your mind caz it's very funny indeed .

ICC is not having problem with him at this stage then what's your headache ? We don't have to think about it & also no need to point it out to let them know for sure .

[chinaman]

Dear Rihaad The Man

Welcome to banglacricket. Since you are new member, please allow me to give you some tips. We have capable moderators to keep an eye and take actions if necessary, on threads and it's contents. We try to maintain a 'G' rated forum and strongly discourage so-called bad words. For all disagreements, you may post your debating points but you must never attack the person. In other words, attack the message not the messanger. Personal attacks are definite no no.

You will find more helpful info in our board rules (link in my signature).

Anyway, this thread is a follow up of another thread. It points out the problem as well as educates us about the solution.

Hope you will enjoy the forum. If you do spot a problem post, please do not hesitate to alert us with a private message (PM) or with the "Report Post" button that looks like a red and white 'x' and we will take it from there. Thanks.

[Miraz]

Chinaman bhai,

If any new members follow your signature link 'Welcome' he finds following two messages

'Page not found' &
'Plumb in front of the middle! ;-) and the famous index finger of David Shephard'

Just wondering whether it's the ideal way of welcoming new members or its something special to BC

[chinaman]

Thanks, Miraz. That plumb is sure for Nasif, I'm at the non striker's end. He must have to return to the pavillion to fix that