|
Match Archive Relive the match-time passion (Read Only) |
February 23, 2004, 06:27 AM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: September 22, 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,394
|
|
closing in on 43 run last wicket partnership set in the first innings (which had beat old record held by Mashud himself with Sharif).
168 to beat lowest score by us previsouly in Zim
|
February 23, 2004, 06:29 AM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 16, 2004
Location: London
Posts: 300
|
|
next target should be 200, then 250 and the 300 ant to finally 353!!
if not survive the next 46 overs!!
Bangladesh have the best batting lower order to save humiliation, they do it all the time. Not many teams can bowl us out for below 100, even when we give them a start like 14/5.
Fight on bangladesh!!!!1
|
February 23, 2004, 06:32 AM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: September 22, 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,394
|
|
by the way where is the FW and the rest of the "manju can't bat" bashers? True, Manju can't bat. but he can sure stand there, can't he? He was involved in back-to-back 10th wicket partnerships.
But, if we need to drop him becuase Aziz can take more wickets, so be it. We can't let ZIm score 400+ in the next test, even with Wishart, Verm returning (are they?)
|
February 23, 2004, 06:34 AM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: September 22, 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,394
|
|
oh well, over, but they did get past those records!
couple more partnerships in this match and who knows....
|
February 23, 2004, 06:35 AM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 16, 2004
Location: London
Posts: 300
|
|
The top order could learn alot from the lower order on how to bat, they scored almost 150 for the last 5 wickets it the top order had scored atleast 200 we could have won or drawn the game.
|
February 23, 2004, 06:53 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: August 8, 2002
Location: London, UK
Favorite Player: Michael Slater
Posts: 3,959
|
|
Quote:
He was involved in back-to-back 10th wicket partnerships.
|
He's done that lots of times :P
|
February 23, 2004, 07:02 AM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 15, 2004
Location: shundor bon
Posts: 358
|
|
Take this!
Man of the Match is Habibul Bashar!
wonderful or what?
|
February 23, 2004, 07:38 AM
|
Street Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 16, 2004
Posts: 29
|
|
U idiot, where does it say M-O-M is Habibul Bashar?
pavs
|
February 23, 2004, 07:56 AM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 15, 2004
Location: shundor bon
Posts: 358
|
|
Dear pavel,
Idiot is a very strong word.
If you can ask Hasib, I am sure he can explain you what happened in the cricinfo. H Bashar's name was there for a good 20min or so..........
Good day!
|
February 23, 2004, 08:00 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: August 13, 2003
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 2,746
|
|
Sage... wat do u mean I jinxed Bangladesh for the past 26 mathces?!!!
|
February 23, 2004, 08:07 AM
|
|
Chief Moderator
|
|
Join Date: August 22, 2003
Favorite Player: Shakib Al Hasan
Posts: 5,942
|
|
Man of the Match: SM Ervine
|
February 23, 2004, 08:19 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: August 13, 2003
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 2,746
|
|
Check the poll section... already been stated
|
February 23, 2004, 08:23 AM
|
Street Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 16, 2004
Posts: 29
|
|
If this is the case than I am sorry.
But I checked myself and I was on cricinfo webpage covering the game the whole day and I haven't seen it so I thought you were intentionally spreading mis-information; which obviously ticked me.
Anyways, sorry again.
Cheers,
pavs
|
February 23, 2004, 08:37 AM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 16, 2004
Posts: 494
|
|
Tareq Aziz in second test. what do you guys think? Tareq for Monzurul.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 AM.
|
|