100s in every match? no way. even the most consistant batsman of cricket history doesn't have such record. but, i see the point. if at least one top order can get a century (or close to century) and either of the two happens:
1. another batsman gets century or close to that
2. another 2 batsmen gets 60+ innings, we'll be pretty soon on the winning side.
but again, others has to contribute too. i think we don't have that much qualified player that one player can win a game. we still have to depend on team afford.
|