|
Match Archive Relive the match-time passion (Read Only) |
February 19, 2004, 10:05 PM
|
Retired BC Admin
|
|
Join Date: August 14, 2003
Location: pc near u
Posts: 8,021
|
|
BD vs Ind Score
Bangladesh Under-19s won the toss and elected to field first .
|
February 19, 2004, 10:08 PM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: September 21, 2003
Location: London/Dubai
Posts: 735
|
|
Do you think thats a good decision chinaman? An amateur BD cricket fan asking a pro
|
February 19, 2004, 10:11 PM
|
Street Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: October 9, 2003
Posts: 27
|
|
Bangladesh-India LIVE scorecard
2 overs-14 run
|
February 19, 2004, 10:12 PM
|
Retired BC Admin
|
|
Join Date: August 14, 2003
Location: pc near u
Posts: 8,021
|
|
I'm not a pro.
The decision is smart but risky, kind of do or die thing. I might be wrong though.
|
February 19, 2004, 10:13 PM
|
Street Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: October 9, 2003
Posts: 27
|
|
TOTAL : (in 2.3 overs, for 0 wicket) 19 Run Rate : 7.6
|
February 19, 2004, 10:13 PM
|
Retired BC Admin
|
|
Join Date: August 14, 2003
Location: pc near u
Posts: 8,021
|
|
Another thread was already started. I'm moving it there.
|
February 19, 2004, 10:16 PM
|
Street Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: October 9, 2003
Posts: 27
|
|
TOTAL : (in 3.1 overs, for 0 wicket) 20 Run Rate : 6.32
|
February 19, 2004, 10:19 PM
|
Street Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: October 9, 2003
Posts: 27
|
|
1st Innings
India
Batsman Status Runs Balls 4's 6's S.Rate
R Uthappa batting 9 15 2 0 60
S Dhawan batting On Strike 13 8 2 0 162.5
A Rayudu
S Raina
P Waghela
D Karthik
S Singh
G Dhiman
V Singh
A Sharma
R Singh
EXTRAS : b - 2, w - 2, nb - 0, lb - 0, p - 0 4
TOTAL : (in 3.5 overs, for 0 wicket) 26 Run Rate : 6.78
|
February 19, 2004, 10:20 PM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: September 21, 2003
Location: London/Dubai
Posts: 735
|
|
Hmm.. good start by India.
|
February 19, 2004, 10:29 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: February 15, 2004
Location: Michigan
Favorite Player: Mashrafee Mortaza
Posts: 8,361
|
|
Bad for us
I can see its good start for IND. so bad for us. i really can't understand why they choose to field. see, it 40 now with 6 RR.
|
February 19, 2004, 10:30 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 15, 2004
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,391
|
|
Bowler Rubaiyat Huq should be changed now.
|
February 19, 2004, 10:33 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: February 15, 2004
Location: Michigan
Favorite Player: Mashrafee Mortaza
Posts: 8,361
|
|
already done
bidyut haq is changed and ne bowler is doing good on the first over.
|
February 19, 2004, 10:34 PM
|
|
Club Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 16, 2004
Location: Dresden, Deutschland
Posts: 111
|
|
Another *Poor* decision to put India into bat. Good luck BD in plate.
|
February 19, 2004, 10:36 PM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: September 21, 2003
Location: London/Dubai
Posts: 735
|
|
So most ppl think its a poor decision then. So why do they take these decisions.....
|
February 19, 2004, 10:37 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: February 15, 2004
Location: Michigan
Favorite Player: Mashrafee Mortaza
Posts: 8,361
|
|
I\'m not
I'm not gonna see them in plate. either i see them in super league or i don't see them. looking at the score, it seems like i don't need to spend anymore of my time trying to know whats going on in u19
|
February 19, 2004, 10:39 PM
|
Club Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 13, 2004
Posts: 51
|
|
i think everything is just right! they seem to have a very good batting line up. so that way if we can get them to score a total with in 200-250 will be good. And no matter what we will have to score that and win. All we need is to restrict them and get our batters to do well. So hold your fingers crossed and hope nothing we do well when batting!
|
February 19, 2004, 10:40 PM
|
|
Club Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 16, 2004
Location: Dresden, Deutschland
Posts: 111
|
|
Its a series of Special* decisions. Put Scot on bat, now put India. I never heard any captain took fielding on Dhaka Stadium which is always known as a batting paradise. You know what...we just suck.
|
February 19, 2004, 10:50 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: February 15, 2004
Location: Michigan
Favorite Player: Mashrafee Mortaza
Posts: 8,361
|
|
can anyone explain
ok. i can't figure out any logic behind deciding to bat. if we need big score match, bat first and get the big score. if we can't get big score batting first, we'll still have a chance to win and so chance to super league. but if they do the big score, we HAVE to do that. so, the way i look at it, there is not anything we cannot do by batting first, but there are things that we cannot do if we field. we are limiting our chances. why?
[score board looks like a galaxy made of fours and wides]
[Edited on 20-2-2004 by AgentSmith]
|
February 19, 2004, 10:52 PM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: September 21, 2003
Location: London/Dubai
Posts: 735
|
|
Yup. I don't get it. Wierd! Very wierd!
|
February 19, 2004, 10:54 PM
|
|
Club Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 16, 2004
Location: Dresden, Deutschland
Posts: 111
|
|
Forget about run rate and all those stuffs. Only tell me why not to bat first on a very much batting pitch ?
|
February 19, 2004, 10:58 PM
|
Retired BC Admin
|
|
Join Date: August 14, 2003
Location: pc near u
Posts: 8,021
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by AgentSmith
ok. i can't figure out any logic behind deciding to bat. if we need big score match, bat first and get the big score. if we can't get big score batting first, we'll still have a chance to win and so chance to super league. but if they do the big score, we HAVE to do that. so, the way i look at it, there is not anything we cannot do by batting first, but there are things that we cannot do if we field. we are limiting our chances. why?
[score board looks like a galaxy made of fours and wides]
[Edited on 20-2-2004 by AgentSmith]
|
No need to explain really. They know better than us all about their strength, weakness, pitch condition etc.
Our batting strength is real good too. Just like India, our batsmen are capable of building a large score.
|
February 19, 2004, 11:03 PM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: September 21, 2003
Location: London/Dubai
Posts: 735
|
|
Yeah Chinaman is right. They're the pros.
|
February 19, 2004, 11:04 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: February 15, 2004
Location: Michigan
Favorite Player: Mashrafee Mortaza
Posts: 8,361
|
|
I HOPE you are right and they didn't do any big mistake. i also hope they understand they logic. i don't need to understand it. all i want is super league.
Protomoto ami super league chi
ditiyoto ami super league chai
tritioto....................lol
|
February 19, 2004, 11:15 PM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: January 31, 2004
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,241
|
|
Bad start!
It seems to me that our boys are going to get thrash today big time!
|
February 19, 2004, 11:17 PM
|
|
First BC Member
|
|
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: A successful cricketer
Posts: 6,545
|
|
The only logic that I can think of of batting first after winning the toss is take up a few early wickets. The wicket doesn't have cracks, like we usually see. So the caoch/captain - team management thought that if we can take a few early wickets using the moisture on the pitch, then it will be a sonay sohaga.
But the thing is that coach did not think that our pace bowlers would be so indisciplined.
And as the commentators are saying, the pace bowlers are trying to bowl faster than they can, which results in bowling short of length balls and thus so many runs are scored off by the Indian youngsters.
After 8/9 overs, when our pace bowlers did start to bowl maintaining a proper line and length, there have been lots of edges that are going to the boundaries, resulting in even more runs for the Indians.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 AM.
|
|