|
Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket
|
June 11, 2005, 06:33 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,918
|
|
some surprising stats
i found the following stats kind of surprsing:
- aftab has a higher test batting average than javed omar (23.36 to 22.93)
- other than enamul, mashrafe has our best bowling average (35.19)
- nazmul has a better test SR than even Mohammad Rafique (77.5 v 83.71)
- tapash's SR is only 93.78
- chacha is our 5th most economical test bowler in history
- mushfiqur rahman is 9th in wickets taken (13)
perhaps nazmul is more test ready than we previously thought. in fact had it not been for his econ, he would have done well.
source: cricket4
Edited on, June 11, 2005, 11:34 PM GMT, by al Furqaan.
|
June 11, 2005, 09:18 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: September 18, 2003
Location: Brampton, Canada
Posts: 1,306
|
|
Aftab, Enamul jnr, Nazmul...none of them did not even play 10 test matches yet
...so there is no point of comparison at this moment...just be patience and see what is there stats going to be after couple of more years
|
June 11, 2005, 09:22 PM
|
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: May 16, 2005
Location: Chittagong
Posts: 490
|
|
this is not a good statistics, at least some player should play 20 tests before we compare them with others
|
June 11, 2005, 10:03 PM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: May 26, 2005
Posts: 261
|
|
Nazmul should have played the tests. Dont know he could have done worse than others, ODI might prove that.
|
June 11, 2005, 11:39 PM
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: December 28, 2003
Location: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 783
|
|
the chacha one was surprising. others dint really entice me
|
June 12, 2005, 05:33 AM
|
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: June 9, 2005
Posts: 1,411
|
|
I think guys Nazmul and Mashrafee are the best bowlers for odi mathces..tapash aint that great
for test cricket its againmash and rafiq
namul shldnt play test match yet...we saw his ability whn he played against ind....and even the team managemnt no ready to take him for test..we are happy that we got junior too in test as some1 wolrd class
|
June 12, 2005, 05:56 AM
|
|
BanglaCricket Staff BC Design Team
|
|
Join Date: January 1, 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Favorite Player: Shahriar Biddyut
Posts: 4,330
|
|
how exactly are these stats "surprising" ?
|
June 12, 2005, 09:59 AM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,918
|
|
nazmul having better SR than rafiq really surprised me, i dont know what you folks are drinking, lol
|
June 12, 2005, 10:46 AM
|
|
BanglaCricket Staff BC Design Team
|
|
Join Date: January 1, 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Favorite Player: Shahriar Biddyut
Posts: 4,330
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by al Furqaan
nazmul having better SR than rafiq really surprised me, i dont know what you folks are drinking, lol
|
nazmul can certainly have better SR than rafique. It is the case because Rafique has been used by Bangladesh for almost 50% of the team's total bowling, but being a bowler from bangladesh, he hasnt got that many wickets to have a low strike rate. On the other hand, Nazmul hasnt bowled much, and his few wickets have helped him get that higher strike rate.
|
June 12, 2005, 06:43 PM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: May 13, 2005
Posts: 405
|
|
Spinners should do most of the bowling anyway. Kaneria does that singlehandedly for Pakistan from one end so why should Rafique be any different.
Khaled Mashud is our worst test bowler. His average is so bad that he had to be dropped from the test team.
I wouldn't mind econ rate of 6 if the average is 30.
A good fast bowler should have a test average of 25 or less. Mash will never achieve that. Batting is a lot easier these days. Shoaib, Mcgrath and Gillespie all have good test averages.
|
June 12, 2005, 06:49 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,918
|
|
a good bowler should have an average of around 27...think about it under 25 is bowling teams out for under 250. how many teams do that routinely?
|
June 12, 2005, 06:55 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 27, 2004
Location: Riverside
Favorite Player: Mustafizur Rahman
Posts: 1,582
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by amim
A good fast bowler should have a test average of 25 or less. Mash will never achieve that. Batting is a lot easier these days. Shoaib, Mcgrath and Gillespie all have good test averages.
|
i agree with your opinion about batting being easier these days. flat pitches are taking over the world. but, you cant say masri will never achieve a test average of below 25. thats preposterous. the guy is still getting better, and he's been getting wickets regularly...despite of all the injuries. he may not get it, but he certainly has a shot at it.
|
June 13, 2005, 08:24 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: September 6, 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,300
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by amim
...Khaled Mashud is our worst test bowler...
|
Khaled Mashud is a BOWLER??
|
June 13, 2005, 08:33 AM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: March 31, 2005
Posts: 860
|
|
How are those stats surprising?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 AM.
|
|